| Literature DB >> 26217500 |
Jana Markert1, Sabine Herget1, Stefanie Marschke1, Thomas Lehnert2, Christian Falkenberg3, Susann Blüher1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In-patient obesity treatment programs for adolescents are associated with good success and substantial weight loss. However, maintaining weight loss remains a challenge. This article presents the concept of the TeAM (Telephone counseling as Adiposity Management) program. TeAM is an innovative, weight maintenance program for obese adolescents after in-patient therapy. It applies the case management approach in combination with new media (telephone counseling, web forum, and SMS messaging). Adolescents (14-18 years) were recruited via German rehabilitation hospitals. The intervention of the TeAM program consists of telephone counseling through trained case managers in order to maintain body weight reduction (expressed as BMI-SDS: body mass index standard deviation score) achieved during an in-patient obesity therapy. At baseline and after completion of the program, participants provide anthropometric measures (obtained by trained medical staff) as well as information on socio-demographics, usage of health services, psychosocial status, daily physical activity, media consumption, and eating behavior. The core of the intervention is regular telephone contact with the adolescent participants combined with tailored SMS messages. Telephone counseling is based on the systemic approach and addresses the topics of mental hygiene, physical activity, sedentary behavior, diet and eating behavior.Entities:
Keywords: Adolescence; Case management; Obesity; Rehabilitation research; Systemic counseling; Tailored short messages; TeAM program; Telephone counseling; Weight maintenance
Year: 2014 PMID: 26217500 PMCID: PMC4472620 DOI: 10.1186/2052-9538-1-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Obes ISSN: 2052-9538
Detailed intervention plan for an individual participant
| Timeline [weeks] | End of in-patient treatment | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13/14 | 15 | 16/17 | 18 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Telephone counseling | Enrolment session + parents* | Anamnestic session | Basic session mental hygiene | Basic session physical activity | Basic session nutrition | Final summary + parents* | ||||||
| SMS | Appointment reminder | Task reminder | Appointment reminder | Task reminder | Appointment reminder | Task reminder | Appointment reminder | Task reminder | Appointment reminder | Task reminder | Appointment reminder | |
| Study visits and online questionnaires | Baseline assessment | Post intervention assessment |
*The respective counseling session is hold with participants and their parents.
Baseline characteristics of the participants from the feasibility study (N = 38)
| Mean ± SD or N (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention I | Intervention II | Control group | Feasibility study in total (Σ) | |
| Number of participants | 12 (31.6%) | 13 (34.2%) | 13 (34.2%) | 38 (100%) |
| Number of females | 8 (66.7%) | 9 (67.2%) | 7 (53.9%) | 24 (63.2%) |
| Age [years] | 15.26 ± 0.93 | 16.22 ± 1.46 | 15.92 ± 1.15 | 15.82 ± 1.24 |
| Duration of in-patient treatment [days]* | 36.09 ± 9.85 | 41.67 ± 8.39 | 31.00 ± 7.20 | 36.00 ± 9.39 |
| Weight loss [BMI-SDS]* | 0.35 ± 0.17 | 0.30 ± 0.11 | 0.30 ± 0.12 | 0.32 ± 0.13 |
| BMI [kg/m2]* | 30.82 ± 3.61 | 33.75 ± 6.14 | 31.11 ± 2.71 | 31.93 ± 4.50 |
| BMI-SDS* | 2.34 ± 0.55 | 2.69 ± 0.76 | 2.41 ± 0.38 | 2.48 ± 0.59 |
| Persons with co-morbidities* | 10 (28.6%) | 10 (28.6%) | 8 (22.9%) | 28 (80.0%) |
| Aspired school level certificate: | ||||
| Less than O-level | 2 (16.7%) | 1 (07.7%) | 3 (23.1%) | 6 (15.8%) |
| O-level | 8 (66.7%) | 10 (76.9%) | 8 (61.5%) | 26 (68.4%) |
| A-level | 2 (16.7%) | 2 (15.4%) | 2 (15.4%) | 6 (15.8%) |
| Single parenthood | 3 (25.0%) | 5 (38.5%) | 2 (15.4%) | 10 (26.3%) |
Data are presented as mean ± SD or as numbers (%). *Medical baseline data is available for 35 participants.