| Literature DB >> 26217499 |
Rima Rafiq El Kishawi1, Kah Leng Soo2, Yehia Awad Abed1, Wan Abdul Manan Wan Muda2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The increasing number of obesity and overweight cases in developing countries, especially among women, requires serious attention because of its effects on the health care system and the quality of life. Few studies have been conducted in the Gaza Strip to determine obesity and overweight prevalence and the associated factors. This study aimed at determining the prevalence of obesity and overweight cases in relation to socio-demographic factors among mothers aged 18-50 years in the Gaza Strip-Palestine from June 2012 to September 2012. Mothers childbearing age 18-50 years (n = 357) were selected using a cross-sectional multistage sampling methodology from three different geographical locations, namely, El Remal urban area, Jabalia refugee camp, and Al Qarrara rural area. The weight and height of the mothers were measured, and their body mass indexes (BMI) were computed. The mothers were categorized according to the criteria of World Health Organization (WHO) for BMI. The criteria categorize mothers as overweight if they have a BMI 25-29.9 kg/m(2) and obese if their BMI ≥ 30.0 kg/m(2).Entities:
Keywords: Obesity; Overweight; Prevalence; Socio-demographic factors
Year: 2014 PMID: 26217499 PMCID: PMC4510884 DOI: 10.1186/2052-9538-1-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Obes ISSN: 2052-9538
The differences of anthropometric measurements and socio-demographic characteristics in the three different locations
| Variables | Urban n = 100 | Rural n = 40 | Refugee camp n = 217 | P-value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n (%) | Mean (SD) | n (%) | Mean (SD) | n (%) | Mean (SD) | ||
|
| 1.60 (0.06) | 1.60 (0.06) | 1.60 (0.05) | 0.890†† | |||
|
| 70.25 (18.20) | 68.40 (12.95) | 71.75(14.5) | 0.390†† | |||
|
| 30.40 (6.13) | 28.73 (6.44) | 31.36 (6.45) | 0.044†† | |||
|
| 6.20 (1.90) | 5.65 (2.10) | 6.82 (1.97) | < 0.001†† | |||
|
| 0.56¶ | ||||||
| Housewife | 93 (93.0) | 38 (95.0) | 208 (95.9) | ||||
| Employee | 7 (7.0) | 2 (5.0) | 9 (9.1) | ||||
|
| 0.425¶ | ||||||
| > 2000 | 37 (37.0) | 9 (22.5) | 63 (29.0) | ||||
| 1000-2000 | 27 (27.0) | 15 (37.5) | 65 (30.0) | ||||
| < 1000 | 36 (36.0) | 16 (40.0) | 89 (41.0) | ||||
|
| < 0.001¶ | ||||||
| Yes | 23 (23.0) | 14 (35.0) | 148 (68.2) | ||||
| No | 77 (77.0) | 26 (65.0) | 69 (31.8) | ||||
|
| 0.005¶ | ||||||
| High | 32 (32.0) | 9 (22.5) | 38 (17.5) | ||||
| Medium | 67 (67.0) | 26 (65.0) | 16 (76.0) | ||||
| Low | 1 (1.0) | 5 (12.5) | 14 (6.5) | ||||
††One way ANOVA, ¶Pearson Chi-Square Test, Significant level at p < 0.05. (NIS) New Israeli Shekel, US$1 = 3.90 Shekel. Assistance: money or food.
Distribution of BMI category in the three different locations
| Variable | BMI | Normal weight | Underweight | Overweight | Obesity | Total | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (SD) | (18.5-24.9) | (< 18.5) | (25.0-29.9) | (≥ 30.0) | n (%) | ||
| City | 27.44 (6.48) | 41 (41.0) | 2 (2.0) | 26 (26.0) | 31 (31.0) | 100 (100.0) | 0.255 |
| Rural | 26.94 (4.86) | 12 (30.0) | 1 (2.5) | 19 (47.5) | 8 (20.0) | 40 (100.0) | |
| Refugee camp | 28.28 (5.80) | 68 (31.4) | 4 (1.8) | 78 (35.9) | 67 (30.9) | 217 (100.0) |
Fisher exact test, significant level at p < 0.05.
BMI classification [12].
Distribution of BMI category among mothers’ age groups
| Variables | BMI | Normal weight (18.5-24.9) | Underweight (< 18.5) | Overweight (25.0-29.9) | Obesity (≥ 30.0) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age group (year) | Mean (SD) | n = 121 (%) | n = 7 (%) | n = 123 (%) | n = 105 (%) |
| 18-28 | 25.7 (5.0) | 72 (49.0) | 6 (4.1) | 46 (31.3) | 23 (15.6) |
| 29-39 | 29.13 (5.79) | 45 (26.0) | 1 (0.6) | 65 (37.6) | 62 (35.8) |
| 40-50 | 32.86 (6.2) | 4 (10.8) | 0 (0.0) | 12 (32.4) | 21 (56.8) |
Pearson Chi-Square Test, Significant level at p < 0.05.
BMI classification [12].
Socio demographic associated factors of BMI amongst women in the Gaza Strip
| Variables | Simple linear regression | Simple linear regression | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ba(95% Cl) | P-value | bb(95% Cl) | P-value | |
| Geographical location0 | 1.35 (−0.63,3.35) | 0.186 | - | - |
| Geographical location1 | 0.51 (−1.67,2.68) | 0.647 | - | - |
| Age (Year) | 0.39 (0.30,0.47) | 0.045 | 0.39 (0.31,0.48) | < 0.001 |
| Educational level0 | −0.57 (−2.05,0.91) | 0.450 | - | - |
| Educational level1 | 2.03 (−0.64,4.70) | 0.140 | - | - |
| Household members | 1.05 (0.76,1.34) | <0.001 | - | - |
| Household assistance | −0.92 (−2.15,0.31) | 0.144 | - | - |
| Monthly income0 | 0.91 (−0.44,2.27) | 0.185 | - | - |
| Monthly income1 | −1.37 (−2.62,-0.12) | 0.032 | −1.59 (−2.74,-0.44) | 0.007 |
| Working | ||||
| Housewife (Reference) | ||||
| Employed mother | −1.24 (−4.06,1.56) | 0.384 | −2.76 (−5.33,-0.19) | 0.036 |
aCrude regression coefficient, bAdjusted regression coefficient.
Stepwise linear regression method applied. There were no interactions amongst independent variables.
Educational level0 is High level to medium and low level. Educational level is Low level to medium and high level.
Income0 is > 2000 shekel to < 1000 and 1000-2000 shekel, Income1 is < 1000 shekel to > 2000 and 1000-2000 shekel.
Geographical location0 is urban to rural and refugee, Geographical location 1 is Refugee to urban and rural area.