| Literature DB >> 26217497 |
Marije Tm van Koperen1, Rianne Mjj van der Kleij2, Carry Cm Renders1, Matty Mr Crone2, Anna-Marie Am Hendriks3, Maria M Jansen4, Vivian Vm van de Gaar5, Hein Jh Raat6, Emilie Elm Ruiter7, Gerard Grm Molleman7, Jantine Aj Schuit8, Jacob Jc Seidell1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this paper is to describe the research aims, concepts and methods of the research Consortium Integrated Approach of Overweight (CIAO). CIAO is a concerted action of five Academic Collaborative Centres, local collaborations between academic institutions, regional public health services, local authorities and other relevant sectors in the Netherlands. Prior research revealed lacunas in knowledge of and skills related to five elements of the integrated approach of overweight prevention in children (based upon the French EPODE approach), namely political support, parental education, implementation, social marketing and evaluation. CIAO aims to gain theoretical and practical insight of these elements through five sub-studies and to develop, based on these data, a framework for monitoring and evaluation. METHODS/Entities:
Keywords: Community; Evaluation framework; Implementation; Integrated approach; Overweight; Parenting; Political support; Social marketing
Year: 2014 PMID: 26217497 PMCID: PMC4472617 DOI: 10.1186/2052-9538-1-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Obes ISSN: 2052-9538
Figure 1JOGG model. This logic model has been based upon the EPODE logic model [15]. It has been developed in the beginning of sub-study 5 by MvK, the JOGG Central Coordination Office and the first six JOGG communities. A clear difference between the two models is the starting point of the four critical components. For the Dutch situation, the developers agreed to move the critical components more to the right of the model, to the local organisation, since development and implementation of these components is mainly at local level. Also a fifth pillar was added to the JOGG model: integrated pathways prevention and care. The JOGG model is being used as a model of reference for implementation and evaluation of the local JOGG approach by JOGG Central Coordination Office and the JOGG communities. Moreover, CIAO uses this model to design and frame its research. The JOGG model has not been published previously.
Figure 2Research outline of CIAO. This figure provides an overview of the four research stages of all the five sub-studies of CIAO.
A concise overview of the 5 sub-studies of CIAO
| Substudy nr. | Theme | ACCs | Research phases | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Identification phase | Development phase | Testing phase | Adaptation & finalization phase | |||
|
| Political-administrative support | Limburg | - Literature review on operational criteria of integrated public health policies | - Develop a conceptual framework which describes the process of developing integrated public health policies. | - Apply developed conceptual framework | - Focus groups with actors at strategic and tactical levels within Dutch local governments to find solutions for previously identified barriers |
| - Interviews with local governmental officials and key-informants, and theoretical reflections to gain insight in the process of developing integrated public health policies | - Interviews with local governmental officials to gain insight in hampering or facilitating factors for intersectoral collaboration | - Refinement of the developed conceptual framework based on the outcomes of the previous studies | ||||
| - Interviews with key-informants within the policy process to explore existing 'interventions for the development of integrated public health policies’ | - Comparison of cases to gain insight in the effects of implementation style on interventions aimed at local governmental officials | - Refinement of the developed conceptual framework based on the outcomes of the previous studies | ||||
| Extra: | - Developing a program or policy resource that might be able to stimulate or facilitate the development of integrated public health policies | |||||
| - Test and evaluate the developed framework in Australia (NSW) - data-collection through interviews with General Managers, Directors of Community Services, Health officials and Environment and Recreation officials, and a document analysis. | ||||||
|
| Social marketing | - CEPHIR/Eras mus/ GGD Rotterdam | - Benchmarks | - Monitoring case-studies | - Evaluation of case-studies using developed monitoring format | - Adapting monitoring tool for Dutch setting |
| - Analyses of Determinants of healthy weight among children | - Develop practical monitoring tool | - Overview of determinants of applying social marketing | ||||
| - Selecting case-studies (interventions to promote healthy weight in childhood based on Social Marketing approach) | ||||||
|
| Implementation | Noordelijk Zuid-Holland | - Systematic Review of design and quality of implementation research regarding complex integrated programs targeting overweight | - Construction of process evaluation plan & several instruments to evaluate the innovation process | - Longitudinal case-studies (5x): Interviews, questionnaires, focus groups, observational research document analyses & semi-action research social network analysis | - An overview of the level and determinants of the innovation process of the integrated approach |
| - Consultation with experts and local project managers | - Parents versus teachers, the relation between task-orientation and implementation | - Guidelines/ indicators for the innovation process | ||||
| - If needed, adaptation of framework Fleuren et al [ | ||||||
|
| Strengthening parenting styles and practices in existing interventions | AMPHI Nijmegen | - Analyses existing data: attitudes professionals and parents on overweight | - Development of a web-based parenting intervention (with the aim of strengthening existing overweight preventing interventions in children) | - Testing the effectiveness of this web-based intervention in a two-armed cluster randomized controlled trial | - Web-based parenting intervention to prevent overweight in children |
| - Literature search of the role of parenting in interventions to prevent overweight in children | - Development of an 'local pedagogical message regarding overweight and obesity’ applicable by all local professionals working with children and their parents | - Focus groups with parents to improve the textual content of the ' local pedagogical message’ | - local pedagogical message | |||
| - Analyses of existing interventions for children and attached parental interventions | - Effect and process evaluation of implementation | |||||
| - Focus groups to gain more insight and get specific examples of difficult daily life situations in which mothers experience problems in promoting healthy eating and physical activity among their children | ||||||
|
| Monitoring & Evaluation | VU University Amsterdam/Windesheim University Zwolle | - Description of EPODE logic model | - Development of evaluation handbook (1.0) and evaluation tools | - Use of Evaluation Handbook (1.0) by JOGG municipalities | - Adaptation and Finalization of: evaluation handbook (2.0), evaluation planning matrix, evaluation training |
| - Evaluation literature | - Development of evaluation training | - Focus groups on evaluation handbook and evaluation training | ||||
| - Interviews with Dutch experts | - JOGG program goals and objectives | - Feedback on evaluation tools and evaluation planning matrix | ||||
| - Comprehensive analyses of evaluation frameworks | - Development evaluation planning matrix | - Data-collection from all CIAO sub-studies inserted in evaluation framework | ||||