Literature DB >> 26215664

Healthcare practitioners' personal and professional values.

Mpatisi Moyo1, Felicity A Goodyear-Smith2, Jennifer Weller3, Gillian Robb4, Boaz Shulruf5.   

Abstract

Personal and professional values of healthcare practitioners influence their clinical decisions. Understanding these values for individuals and across healthcare professions can help improve patient-centred decision-making by individual practitioners and interprofessional teams, respectively. We aimed to identify these values and integrate them into a single framework using Schwartz's values model. We searched Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and ERIC databases for articles on personal and professional values of healthcare practitioners and students. We extracted values from included papers and synthesized them into a single framework using Schwartz's values model. We summarised the framework within the context of healthcare practice. We identified 128 values from 50 included articles from doctors, nurses and allied health professionals. A new framework for the identified values established the following broad healthcare practitioner values, corresponding to Schwartz values (in parentheses): authority (power); capability (achievement); pleasure (hedonism); intellectual stimulation (stimulation); critical-thinking (self-direction); equality (universalism); altruism (benevolence); morality (tradition); professionalism (conformity); safety (security) and spirituality (spirituality). The most prominent values identified were altruism, equality and capability. This review identified a comprehensive set of personal and professional values of healthcare practitioners. We integrated these into a single framework derived from Schwartz's values model. This framework can be used to assess personal and professional values of healthcare practitioners across professional groups, and can help improve practitioners' awareness of their values so they can negotiate more patient-centred decisions. A common values framework across professional groups can support shared education strategies on values and help improve interprofessional teamwork and decision-making.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical decision-making; Clinical education; Healthcare practitioners; Interprofessional practice; Personal values; Professional values; Schwartz’s values model

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26215664     DOI: 10.1007/s10459-015-9626-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract        ISSN: 1382-4996            Impact factor:   3.853


  7 in total

1.  Seven Types of Uncertainty When Clinicians Care for Pediatric Patients With Advanced Cancer.

Authors:  Douglas L Hill; Jennifer K Walter; Julia E Szymczak; Concetta DiDomenico; Shefali Parikh; Chris Feudtner
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 3.612

2.  Conformity Scores Differentiate Older Hemodialyzed Patients and Patients with Continuous Peritoneal Dialysis.

Authors:  Zbigniew Nowak; Krzysztof Laudanski
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2016-11-25

3.  Value-Based Healthcare From the Perspective of the Healthcare Professional: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Veerle van Engen; Igna Bonfrer; Kees Ahaus; Martina Buljac-Samardzic
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-01-13

4.  Student-faculty interactions within a physiotherapy curriculum in South Africa.

Authors:  Serela S Ramklass; Renuka Vithal
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 3.853

5.  Benefits and Barriers to Teaching Medical Students in an Ob-Gyn Clinic.

Authors:  Michael F Fialkow; Carrie M Snead; Jay Schulkin
Journal:  Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol       Date:  2018-02-16

6.  Patient values in physiotherapy practice, a qualitative study.

Authors:  Carla M Bastemeijer; Johannes P van Ewijk; Jan A Hazelzet; Lennard P Voogt
Journal:  Physiother Res Int       Date:  2020-09-11

7.  The influence of personal values and patient intoxication on nurses concerns about opioids: results of a prospective cross-sectional multi-centre study.

Authors:  Antje Heckroth; Vanessa Pludra; Christian Johannssen; Charlotte Guest; Frauke Wiedermann; Carsten Bantel
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2019-10-17
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.