OBJECTIVE: The study's purpose was to test the generalizability of an individualized information prescription model, which has been previously validated for educating patients about hypertension in emergency department and community health center settings. Study investigators assessed the effects of educational materials targeted to health literacy levels and learning styles on patients' diabetes knowledge in a community clinic setting. METHODS:From May to August 2012, 160 patients were recruited and randomized into intervention (n = 81) and control (n = 79) groups. Inclusion criteria included 18 years or older, English or Spanish speaker, and a type 2 diabetes diagnosis. Measures included modified versions of the Diabetes Knowledge Test and Subjective Numeracy Scale, along with brief health literacy and learning style assessments. Study team members contacted both groups after 2 and 6 weeks to reassess diabetes knowledge. RESULTS: The control group showed no significant change in diabetes knowledge at both follow-ups. In contrast, the mean number of diabetes knowledge questions answered correctly by the intervention group increased significantly after 2 weeks (Δ = 2.66, P = 0.000), which persisted at 6 weeks (Δ = 2.46, P = 0.00). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that patients' knowledge about diabetes increased significantly after exposure to educational materials targeted to their health literacy levels and learning style preferences and that the model is transferrable among health conditions.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: The study's purpose was to test the generalizability of an individualized information prescription model, which has been previously validated for educating patients about hypertension in emergency department and community health center settings. Study investigators assessed the effects of educational materials targeted to health literacy levels and learning styles on patients' diabetes knowledge in a community clinic setting. METHODS: From May to August 2012, 160 patients were recruited and randomized into intervention (n = 81) and control (n = 79) groups. Inclusion criteria included 18 years or older, English or Spanish speaker, and a type 2 diabetes diagnosis. Measures included modified versions of the Diabetes Knowledge Test and Subjective Numeracy Scale, along with brief health literacy and learning style assessments. Study team members contacted both groups after 2 and 6 weeks to reassess diabetes knowledge. RESULTS: The control group showed no significant change in diabetes knowledge at both follow-ups. In contrast, the mean number of diabetes knowledge questions answered correctly by the intervention group increased significantly after 2 weeks (Δ = 2.66, P = 0.000), which persisted at 6 weeks (Δ = 2.46, P = 0.00). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that patients' knowledge about diabetes increased significantly after exposure to educational materials targeted to their health literacy levels and learning style preferences and that the model is transferrable among health conditions.
Entities:
Keywords:
Community Health Centers; Diabetes; Health Communication; Health Literacy; Learning; Patient Education
Authors: Chandra Y Osborn; Kerri Cavanaugh; Kenneth A Wallston; Sunil Kripalani; Tom A Elasy; Russell L Rothman; Richard O White Journal: J Health Commun Date: 2011
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Drenna Waldrop-Valverde; Chandra Y Osborn; Allan Rodriguez; Russell L Rothman; Mahendra Kumar; Deborah L Jones Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2009-08-08
Authors: Candace McNaughton; Kenneth A Wallston; Russell L Rothman; David E Marcovitz; Alan B Storrow Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Angelo E Volandes; Michael Paasche-Orlow; Muriel R Gillick; E F Cook; Shimon Shaykevich; Elmer D Abbo; Lisa Lehmann Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Lisa D Chew; Joan M Griffin; Melissa R Partin; Siamak Noorbaloochi; Joseph P Grill; Annamay Snyder; Katharine A Bradley; Sean M Nugent; Alisha D Baines; Michelle Vanryn Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2008-03-12 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Kerri Cavanaugh; Mary Margaret Huizinga; Kenneth A Wallston; Tebeb Gebretsadik; Ayumi Shintani; Dianne Davis; Rebecca Pratt Gregory; Lynn Fuchs; Robb Malone; Andrea Cherrington; Michael Pignone; Darren A DeWalt; Tom A Elasy; Russell L Rothman Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2008-05-20 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Chandra Y Osborn; Kerri Cavanaugh; Kenneth A Wallston; Richard O White; Russell L Rothman Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2009-04-28 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Christine M Micheel; Ingrid A Anderson; Patricia Lee; Sheau-Chiann Chen; Katy Justiss; Nunzia B Giuse; Fei Ye; Sheila V Kusnoor; Mia A Levy Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2017-07-25 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Jacqueline D Cotugno; Maree Ferguson; Hazel Harden; Shoni Colquist; Annabelle A Stack; Jane I Zimmerman; Anthony W Russell; Lauren E Ball; Ingrid J Hickman Journal: Patient Prefer Adherence Date: 2015-11-17 Impact factor: 2.711
Authors: Dianne Goeman; Sue Conway; Ralph Norman; Jo Morley; Rona Weerasuriya; Richard H Osborne; Alison Beauchamp Journal: J Diabetes Res Date: 2016-09-07 Impact factor: 4.011