Literature DB >> 26212887

Mechanical response comparison in an implant overdenture retained by ball attachments on conventional regular and mini dental implants: a finite element analysis.

Shih-Hao Chang1,2, Shiang-Rung Huang3, Shao-Fu Huang4, Chun-Li Lin4.   

Abstract

This study investigates the bone/implant mechanical responses in an implant overdenture retained by ball attachments on two conventional regular dental implants (RDI) and four mini dental implants (MDI) using finite element (FE) analysis. Two FE models of overdentures retained by RDIs and MDIs for a mandibular edentulous patient with validation within 6% variation errors were constructed by integrating CT images and CAD system. Bone grafting resulted in 2 mm thickness at the buccal side constructed for the RDIs-supported model to mimic the bone augmentation condition for the atrophic alveolar ridge. Nonlinear hyperelastic material and frictional contact element were used to simulate characteristic of the ball attachment-retained overdentures. The results showed that a denture supported by MDIs presented higher surrounding bone strains than those supported by RDIs under different load conditions. Maximum bone micro strains were up to 6437/2987 and 13323/5856 for MDIs/RDIs under single centric and lateral contacts, respectively. Corresponding values were 4429/2579 and 9557/5774 under multi- centric and lateral contacts, respectively. Bone micro strains increased 2.06 and 1.96-folds under single contact, 2.16 and 2.24-folds under multiple contacts for MDIs and RDIs when lateral to axial loads were compared. The maximum RDIs and MDIs implant stresses in all simulated cases were found by far lower than their yield strength. Overdentures retained using ball attachments on MDIs in poor edentulous bone structure increase the surrounding bone strain over the critical value, thereby damaging the bone when compared to the RDIs. Eliminating the occlusal single contact and oblique load of an implant-retained overdenture reduces the risk for failure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Overdenture; bone strain; finite element analysis; mini dental implant; regular dental implant

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26212887     DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2015.1067687

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin        ISSN: 1025-5842            Impact factor:   1.763


  5 in total

1.  Early Loaded Single Implant Reinforced Mandibular Overdenture.

Authors:  K Nischal; R Chowdhary
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2016-06-14

Review 2.  To what extent residual alveolar ridge can be preserved by implant? A systematic review.

Authors:  Ahmed Khalifa Khalifa; Masahiro Wada; Kazunori Ikebe; Yoshinobu Maeda
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2016-11-23

Review 3.  Finite element analysis of dental implants with validation: to what extent can we expect the model to predict biological phenomena? A literature review and proposal for classification of a validation process.

Authors:  Yuanhan Chang; Abhijit Anil Tambe; Yoshinobu Maeda; Masahiro Wada; Tomoya Gonda
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2018-03-08

4.  Evaluation of stress distribution of porous tantalum and solid titanium implant-assisted overdenture in the mandible: A finite element study.

Authors:  Ayshin Akbarzadeh; Yasser Hemmati; Fariba Saleh-Saber
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2021-12-10

5.  Long-Term Fatigue and Its Probability of Failure Applied to Dental Implants.

Authors:  María Prados-Privado; Juan Carlos Prados-Frutos; Sérgio Alexandre Gehrke; Mariano Sánchez Siles; José Luis Calvo Guirado; José Antonio Bea
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 3.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.