| Literature DB >> 26210944 |
Abstract
Health insurance benefit mandates are believed to have adverse effects on the labor market, but efforts to document such effects for mental health parity mandates have had limited success. I show that one reason for this failure is that the association between parity mandates and labor market outcomes vary with mental distress. Accounting for this heterogeneity, I find adverse labor market effects for non-distressed individuals, but favorable effects for moderately distressed individuals and individuals with a moderately distressed family member. On net, I conclude that the mandates are welfare increasing for moderately distressed workers and their families, but may be welfare decreasing for non-distressed individuals.Entities:
Keywords: Benefit mandates; Insurance; Labor supply; Mental health
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26210944 PMCID: PMC4591173 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2015.06.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Health Econ ISSN: 0167-6296 Impact factor: 3.883