Literature DB >> 19069012

New evidence on the effects of state mental health mandates.

Susan H Busch1, Colleen L Barry.   

Abstract

State mental health parity laws improve equity in private insurance coverage for mental and physical health services, but prior research shows no effect on service use. We study whether state parity differentially affects individuals by employer size since large firms are often exempt from state health mandates due to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. We also examine whether state parity laws differentially affect use among individuals with low incomes or in poor mental health. We find that individuals in smaller firms are more likely to use services post-parity implementation and that this effect is concentrated among low-income individuals.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19069012     DOI: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_45.03.308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inquiry        ISSN: 0046-9580            Impact factor:   1.730


  10 in total

1.  A political history of federal mental health and addiction insurance parity.

Authors:  Colleen L Barry; Haiden A Huskamp; Howard H Goldman
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  Association of Federal Mental Health Parity Legislation With Health Care Use and Spending Among High Utilizers of Services.

Authors:  Rebecca L Haffajee; Michelle M Mello; Fang Zhang; Alisa B Busch; Alan M Zaslavsky; J Frank Wharam
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 3.  Effects of mental health benefits legislation: a community guide systematic review.

Authors:  Theresa Ann Sipe; Ramona K C Finnie; John A Knopf; Shuli Qu; Jeffrey A Reynolds; Anilkrishna B Thota; Robert A Hahn; Ron Z Goetzel; Kevin D Hennessy; Lela R McKnight-Eily; Daniel P Chapman; Clinton W Anderson; Susan Azrin; Ana F Abraido-Lanza; Alan J Gelenberg; Mary E Vernon-Smiley; Donald E Nease
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Health Insurance Mandates, Mammography, and Breast Cancer Diagnoses.

Authors:  Marianne P Bitler; Christopher S Carpenter
Journal:  Am Econ J Econ Policy       Date:  2016-08

5.  Do coverage mandates affect direct-to-consumer advertising for pharmaceuticals? Evidence from parity laws.

Authors:  Robert Nathenson; Michael R Richards
Journal:  Int J Health Econ Manag       Date:  2018-01-29

6.  Behavioral health services in separate CHIP programs on the eve of parity.

Authors:  Rachel L Garfield; William R Beardslee; Shelly F Greenfield; Ellen Meara
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2012-05

7.  Heterogeneity and the effect of mental health parity mandates on the labor market.

Authors:  Martin Andersen
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 3.883

8.  The effects of federal parity on substance use disorder treatment.

Authors:  Susan H Busch; Andrew J Epstein; Michael O Harhay; David A Fiellin; Hyong Un; Deane Leader; Colleen L Barry
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.229

9.  Assessing barriers to health insurance and threats to equity in comparative perspective: the Health Insurance Access Database.

Authors:  Amélie Quesnel-Vallée; Emilie Renahy; Tania Jenkins; Helen Cerigo
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Impact of Mental Health Insurance Legislation on Mental Health Treatment in a Longitudinal Sample of Adolescents.

Authors:  Vahé Heboyan; Megan D Douglas; Brian McGregor; Teal W Benevides
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.178

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.