Literature DB >> 26210185

Identifying potential endocrine disruptors among industrial chemicals and their metabolites--development and evaluation of in silico tools.

Aleksandra Rybacka1, Christina Rudén2, Igor V Tetko3, Patrik L Andersson4.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to improve the identification of endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) by developing and evaluating in silico tools that predict interactions at the estrogen (E) and androgen (A) receptors, and binding to transthyretin (T). In particular, the study focuses on evaluating the use of the EAT models in combination with a metabolism simulator to study the significance of bioactivation for endocrine disruption. Balanced accuracies of the EAT models ranged from 77-87%, 62-77%, and 65-89% for E-, A-, and T-binding respectively. The developed models were applied on a set of more than 6000 commonly used industrial chemicals of which 9% were predicted E- and/or A-binders and 1% were predicted T-binders. The numbers of E- and T-binders increased 2- and 3-fold, respectively, after metabolic transformation, while the number of A-binders marginally changed. In-depth validation confirmed that several of the predicted bioactivated E- or T-binders demonstrated in vivo estrogenic activity or influenced blood levels of thyroxine in vivo. The metabolite simulator was evaluated using in vivo data from the literature which showed a 50% accuracy for studied chemicals. The study stresses, in summary, the importance of including metabolic activation in prioritization activities of potentially emerging contaminants.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Androgen; Endocrine disruptor; Estrogen; Metabolism; QSAR; Transthyretin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26210185     DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.07.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


  11 in total

Review 1.  QSAR without borders.

Authors:  Eugene N Muratov; Jürgen Bajorath; Robert P Sheridan; Igor V Tetko; Dmitry Filimonov; Vladimir Poroikov; Tudor I Oprea; Igor I Baskin; Alexandre Varnek; Adrian Roitberg; Olexandr Isayev; Stefano Curtarolo; Denis Fourches; Yoram Cohen; Alan Aspuru-Guzik; David A Winkler; Dimitris Agrafiotis; Artem Cherkasov; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 54.564

2.  Transformer-CNN: Swiss knife for QSAR modeling and interpretation.

Authors:  Pavel Karpov; Guillaume Godin; Igor V Tetko
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 5.514

3.  Integration of in silico methods and computational systems biology to explore endocrine-disrupting chemical binding with nuclear hormone receptors.

Authors:  P Ruiz; A Sack; M Wampole; S Bobst; M Vracko
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 7.086

4.  Computational Approach to Structural Alerts: Furans, Phenols, Nitroaromatics, and Thiophenes.

Authors:  Na Le Dang; Tyler B Hughes; Grover P Miller; S Joshua Swamidass
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 3.739

5.  CERAPP: Collaborative Estrogen Receptor Activity Prediction Project.

Authors:  Kamel Mansouri; Ahmed Abdelaziz; Aleksandra Rybacka; Alessandra Roncaglioni; Alexander Tropsha; Alexandre Varnek; Alexey Zakharov; Andrew Worth; Ann M Richard; Christopher M Grulke; Daniela Trisciuzzi; Denis Fourches; Dragos Horvath; Emilio Benfenati; Eugene Muratov; Eva Bay Wedebye; Francesca Grisoni; Giuseppe F Mangiatordi; Giuseppina M Incisivo; Huixiao Hong; Hui W Ng; Igor V Tetko; Ilya Balabin; Jayaram Kancherla; Jie Shen; Julien Burton; Marc Nicklaus; Matteo Cassotti; Nikolai G Nikolov; Orazio Nicolotti; Patrik L Andersson; Qingda Zang; Regina Politi; Richard D Beger; Roberto Todeschini; Ruili Huang; Sherif Farag; Sine A Rosenberg; Svetoslav Slavov; Xin Hu; Richard S Judson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Combining In Silico Tools with Multicriteria Analysis for Alternatives Assessment of Hazardous Chemicals: Accounting for the Transformation Products of decaBDE and Its Alternatives.

Authors:  Ziye Zheng; Hans Peter H Arp; Gregory Peters; Patrik L Andersson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Predicting Potential Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals Binding to Estrogen Receptor α (ERα) Using a Pipeline Combining Structure-Based and Ligand-Based in Silico Methods.

Authors:  Asma Sellami; Matthieu Montes; Nathalie Lagarde
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  ToxCast EPA in Vitro to in Vivo Challenge: Insight into the Rank-I Model.

Authors:  Sergii Novotarskyi; Ahmed Abdelaziz; Yurii Sushko; Robert Körner; Joachim Vogt; Igor V Tetko
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 3.739

9.  Extended Functional Groups (EFG): An Efficient Set for Chemical Characterization and Structure-Activity Relationship Studies of Chemical Compounds.

Authors:  Elena S Salmina; Norbert Haider; Igor V Tetko
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 4.411

10.  In-silico evaluation of Malawi essential medicines and reactive metabolites for potential drug-induced toxicities.

Authors:  Ibrahim Chikowe; Alfred Chipanda Phiri; Kirios Patrick Mbewe; Dunstan Matekenya
Journal:  BMC Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 2.483

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.