Tonita E Wroolie1, Heather A Kenna1, Katherine E Williams1, Natalie L Rasgon2. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford Center for Neuroscience in Women's Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA. 2. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford Center for Neuroscience in Women's Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA. Electronic address: nrasgon@stanford.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Use of estrogen-based hormone therapy (HT) as a protection from cognitive decline and Alzheimer disease (AD) is controversial, although cumulative data support HT use when initiated close to menopause onset with estrogen formulations containing 17β-estradiol preferable to conjugated equine estrogen formulations. Little is known regarding specific populations of women who may derive benefit from HT. METHODS:Women with heightened risk for AD (aged 49-69), all of whom were taking HT for at least 1 year and most of whom initiated HT close to menopause onset, underwent cognitive assessment followed by randomization to continue or discontinue HT. Assessments were repeated at 2 years after randomization. RESULTS: Women who continued HT performed better on cognitive domains composed of measures of verbal memory and combined attention, working memory, and processing speed measures. Women who used 17β-estradiol versus conjugated equine estrogen, whether randomized to continue or discontinue HT, showed better verbal memory performance at the 2-year follow-up assessment. An interaction was also found with HT randomization and family history of AD in a first-degree relative. All female offspring of patients with AD declined in verbal memory; however, women who continued HT declined less than women who discontinued HT. Women without a first-degree relative with AD showed verbal memory improvement (likely because of practice effects) with continuance and declined with discontinuance of HT. CONCLUSION: Continuation of HT use appears to protect cognition in women with heightened risk for AD when initiated close to menopause onset.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Use of estrogen-based hormone therapy (HT) as a protection from cognitive decline and Alzheimer disease (AD) is controversial, although cumulative data support HT use when initiated close to menopause onset with estrogen formulations containing 17β-estradiol preferable to conjugated equine estrogen formulations. Little is known regarding specific populations of women who may derive benefit from HT. METHODS:Women with heightened risk for AD (aged 49-69), all of whom were taking HT for at least 1 year and most of whom initiated HT close to menopause onset, underwent cognitive assessment followed by randomization to continue or discontinue HT. Assessments were repeated at 2 years after randomization. RESULTS:Women who continued HT performed better on cognitive domains composed of measures of verbal memory and combined attention, working memory, and processing speed measures. Women who used 17β-estradiol versus conjugated equine estrogen, whether randomized to continue or discontinue HT, showed better verbal memory performance at the 2-year follow-up assessment. An interaction was also found with HT randomization and family history of AD in a first-degree relative. All female offspring of patients with AD declined in verbal memory; however, women who continued HT declined less than women who discontinued HT. Women without a first-degree relative with AD showed verbal memory improvement (likely because of practice effects) with continuance and declined with discontinuance of HT. CONCLUSION: Continuation of HT use appears to protect cognition in women with heightened risk for AD when initiated close to menopause onset.
Authors: C E Gleason; T W Schmitz; T Hess; R L Koscik; M A Trivedi; M L Ries; C M Carlsson; M A Sager; S Asthana; S C Johnson Journal: Neurology Date: 2006-12-12 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: M Gatz; N L Pedersen; S Berg; B Johansson; K Johansson; J A Mortimer; S F Posner; M Viitanen; B Winblad; A Ahlbom Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 1997-03 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: S Kristian Hill; James L Reilly; Margret S H Harris; Cherise Rosen; Robert W Marvin; Ovidio Deleon; John A Sweeney Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2009-05-17 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Huibo Shao; John C S Breitner; Rachel A Whitmer; Junmin Wang; Kathleen Hayden; Heidi Wengreen; Chris Corcoran; Joann Tschanz; Maria Norton; Ron Munger; Kathleen Welsh-Bohmer; Peter P Zandi Journal: Neurology Date: 2012-10-24 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Kelly M Stanek; Gladys Strain; Michael Devlin; Ronald Cohen; Robert Paul; Ross D Crosby; James E Mitchell; John Gunstad Journal: Neuropsychology Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Anne Caroline S Barbosa; Ye Feng; Chaohui Yu; Min Huang; Wen Xie Journal: Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol Date: 2019-03-18 Impact factor: 4.481
Authors: Kyoko Konishi; Sara Cherkerzian; Sarah Aroner; Emily G Jacobs; Dorene M Rentz; Anne Remington; Harlyn Aizley; Mady Hornig; Anne Klibanski; Jill M Goldstein Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2019-12-24 Impact factor: 4.673