Kevin Duff1, Gordon Chelune, Kathryn Dennett. 1. Department of Neurology, Center for Alzheimer's Care, Imaging and Research, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84108, USA. kevin.duff@hsc.utah.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Practice effects are improvements in cognitive test performance associated with repeated administrations of same or similar measures and are traditionally seen as error variance. However, there is growing evidence that practice effects provide clinically useful information. METHODS: Within-session practice effects (WISPE) across 2 h were collected from 61 non-consecutive patients referred for suspected dementia and compared to the Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE), a screening measure of dementia severity. RESULTS: In all patients, WISPE on two cognitive measures were significantly correlated with MMSE, even after controlling for baseline cognitive scores (partial r = 0.47, p < 0.001; partial r = 0.26, p = 0.046). In patients diagnosed with probable Alzheimer's disease, the trend was even stronger (partial r = 0.72, p < 0.01; partial r = 0.58, p = 0.046). In both groups, lower WISPE were associated with lower MMSE scores (i.e. greater dementia severity), even after controlling for initial cognitive scores. CONCLUSION: If future research validates these findings with longitudinal studies, then WISPE may have important clinical applications in dementia evaluations.
BACKGROUND: Practice effects are improvements in cognitive test performance associated with repeated administrations of same or similar measures and are traditionally seen as error variance. However, there is growing evidence that practice effects provide clinically useful information. METHODS: Within-session practice effects (WISPE) across 2 h were collected from 61 non-consecutive patients referred for suspected dementia and compared to the Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE), a screening measure of dementia severity. RESULTS: In all patients, WISPE on two cognitive measures were significantly correlated with MMSE, even after controlling for baseline cognitive scores (partial r = 0.47, p < 0.001; partial r = 0.26, p = 0.046). In patients diagnosed with probable Alzheimer's disease, the trend was even stronger (partial r = 0.72, p < 0.01; partial r = 0.58, p = 0.046). In both groups, lower WISPE were associated with lower MMSE scores (i.e. greater dementia severity), even after controlling for initial cognitive scores. CONCLUSION: If future research validates these findings with longitudinal studies, then WISPE may have important clinical applications in dementia evaluations.
Authors: Kevin Duff; Constantine G Lyketsos; Leigh J Beglinger; Gordon Chelune; David J Moser; Stephan Arndt; Susan K Schultz; Jane S Paulsen; Ronald C Petersen; Robert J McCaffrey Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Alexandre Vivot; Melinda C Power; M Maria Glymour; Elizabeth R Mayeda; Andreana Benitez; Avron Spiro; Jennifer J Manly; Cécile Proust-Lima; Carole Dufouil; Alden L Gross Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2016-01-28 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Muhammad Haroon Burhanullah; JoAnn T Tschanz; Matthew E Peters; Jeannie-Marie Leoutsakos; Joshua Matyi; Constantine G Lyketsos; Milap A Nowrangi; Paul B Rosenberg Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2019-05-23 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Tonita E Wroolie; Heather A Kenna; Katherine E Williams; Natalie L Rasgon Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2015-05-21 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Roos J Jutten; Evan Grandoit; Nancy S Foldi; Sietske A M Sikkes; Richard N Jones; Seo-Eun Choi; Melissa L Lamar; Diana K N Louden; Joanne Rich; Douglas Tommet; Paul K Crane; Laura A Rabin Journal: Alzheimers Dement (Amst) Date: 2020-07-09