Megan L Petrik1, Peter M Gutierrez1, Jon S Berlin2, Stephen M Saunders3. 1. Rocky Mountain Mental Illness Research Education and Clinical Center, Denver VA Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA. 2. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA. 3. Department of Psychology, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To understand emergency department (ED) providers' perspectives regarding the barriers and facilitators of suicide risk assessment and to use these perspectives to inform recommendations for best practices in ED suicide risk assessment. METHODS: Ninety-two ED providers from two hospital systems in a Midwestern state responded to open-ended questions via an online survey that assessed their perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to assess suicide risk as well as their preferred assessment methods. Responses were analyzed using an inductive thematic analysis approach. RESULTS: Qualitative analysis yielded six themes that impact suicide risk assessment. Time, privacy, collaboration and consultation with other professionals and integration of a standard screening protocol in routine care exemplified environmental and systemic themes. Patient engagement/participation in assessment and providers' approach to communicating with patients and other providers also impacted the effectiveness of suicide risk assessment efforts. CONCLUSION: The findings inform feasible suicide risk assessment practices in EDs. Appropriately utilizing a collaborative, multidisciplinary approach to assess suicide-related concerns appears to be a promising approach to ameliorate the burden placed on ED providers and facilitate optimal patient care. Recommendations for clinical care, education, quality improvement and research are offered. Published by Elsevier Inc.
OBJECTIVE: To understand emergency department (ED) providers' perspectives regarding the barriers and facilitators of suicide risk assessment and to use these perspectives to inform recommendations for best practices in ED suicide risk assessment. METHODS: Ninety-two ED providers from two hospital systems in a Midwestern state responded to open-ended questions via an online survey that assessed their perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to assess suicide risk as well as their preferred assessment methods. Responses were analyzed using an inductive thematic analysis approach. RESULTS: Qualitative analysis yielded six themes that impact suicide risk assessment. Time, privacy, collaboration and consultation with other professionals and integration of a standard screening protocol in routine care exemplified environmental and systemic themes. Patient engagement/participation in assessment and providers' approach to communicating with patients and other providers also impacted the effectiveness of suicide risk assessment efforts. CONCLUSION: The findings inform feasible suicide risk assessment practices in EDs. Appropriately utilizing a collaborative, multidisciplinary approach to assess suicide-related concerns appears to be a promising approach to ameliorate the burden placed on ED providers and facilitate optimal patient care. Recommendations for clinical care, education, quality improvement and research are offered. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Entities:
Keywords:
Emergency department; Health care providers; Qualitative methods; Suicide; Suicide risk assessment
Authors: Marian E Betz; Christopher E Knoepke; Bonnie Siry; Ashley Clement; Deborah Azrael; Stephanie Ernestus; Daniel D Matlock Journal: Inj Prev Date: 2018-10-13 Impact factor: 2.399
Authors: Marian E Betz; Matthew Miller; Catherine Barber; Brenda Beaty; Ivan Miller; Carlos A Camargo; Edwin D Boudreaux Journal: Depress Anxiety Date: 2016-03-17 Impact factor: 6.505
Authors: Marian E Betz; Ashley Brooks-Russell; Sara Brandspigel; Douglas K Novins; Gregory J Tung; Carol Runyan Journal: J Emerg Nurs Date: 2018-04-25 Impact factor: 1.836
Authors: Chantel Urban; Sarah A Arias; Daniel L Segal; Carlos A Camargo; Edwin D Boudreaux; Ivan Miller; Marian E Betz Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2018-09-25 Impact factor: 3.238