| Literature DB >> 26207381 |
Liu Yang1, San-Jian Yu1, Qi Hong2, Yu Yang3, Zhi-Ming Shao2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the prognostic role of ten eleven translocation (TET) family proteins and DNA glycosylase (TDG) in patients with early breast cancer (EBC).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26207381 PMCID: PMC4514471 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133896
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Primers used for real-time PCR analysis.
| Gene | Forward primer (5′–3′) | Reverse primer (5′–3′) |
|---|---|---|
| TET1 | CAGAACCTAAACCACCCGTG | TGCTTCGTAGCGCCATTGTAA |
| TET2 | GATAGAACCAACCATGTTGAGGG | TGGAGCTTTGTAGCCAGAGGT |
| TET3 | TCCAGCAACTCCTAGAACTGAG | AGGCCGCTTGAATACTGACTG |
| TDG | TGAAGCTCCTAATATGGCAGTTG | TTCCACTGGTTGTTTTGGTTCT |
| GAPDH | GCCTCAAGATCATCAGCAATGCCT | TGTGGTCATGAGTCCTTCCACGAT |
Clinicopathological characteristics of patients.
| Number of patients | 162 | |
|---|---|---|
| Median age at diagnosis ± SD | 52 ± 10.4 | |
| Age distribution (years) | ||
| <45 | 32 | 19.8% |
| ≥45 | 130 | 80.2% |
| Menopausal status | ||
| Premenopausal | 69 | 42.6% |
| Postmenopausal | 93 | 57.4% |
| Tumor size (cm) | ||
| ≤2 | 48 | 29.6% |
| >2 | 114 | 70.4% |
| Lymph node status | ||
| Negative | 91 | 56.2% |
| Positive | 71 | 43.8% |
| TNM stage | ||
| I | 29 | 17.9% |
| II | 102 | 63.0% |
| III | 31 | 19.1% |
| ER status | ||
| Negative | 93 | 57.4% |
| Positive | 69 | 42.6% |
| PR status | ||
| Negative | 96 | 59.3% |
| Positive | 66 | 40.7% |
| HER-2 status | ||
| Negative | 108 | 66.7% |
| Positive | 36 | 22.2% |
| NA | 18 | 11.1% |
Fig 1Kaplan–Meier analysis of DFS and OS as a function of TET1 mRNA levels.
A. The DFS and OS of all patients were 0.521 and 0.745, respectively. B. Correlation between TET1-3 and TDG mRNAs with DFS and OS in 162 EBC patients. Higher level of TET1 mRNA was related to better OS (P = 0.022) (log-rank test).
Multivariate analysis of DFS and OS in patients with EBC.
| DFS | OS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | P value | HR (95% CI) | P value | |
| Age (years) | 0.973 (0.504–1.878) | 0.935 | 1.712 (0.487–6.020) | 0.402 |
| TNM | 1.761 (1.124–2.761) | 0.014 | 2.135 (1.070–4.263) | 0.032 |
| ER | 0.730 (0.414–1.285) | 0.275 | 0.507 (0.198–1.302) | 0.158 |
| PR | 0.969 (0.550–1.707) | 0.912 | 1.277 (0.507–3.214) | 0.604 |
| HER-2 | 1.335 (0.924–1.929) | 0.124 | 0.642 (0.279–1.481) | 0.299 |
| TET1 | 0.757 (0.235–2.443) | 0.641 | 0.195 (0.031–1.246) | 0.084 |
| TET2 | 1.095 (0.325–3.690) | 0.884 | 2.597 (0.352–19.172) | 0.349 |
| TET3 | 0.856 (0.361–2.027) | 0.724 | 0.960 (0.219–4.216) | 0.957 |
| TDG | 0.786 (0.415–1.489) | 0.461 | 0.651 (0.223–1.90) | 0.432 |
Fig 2Kaplan–Meier analysis of DFS and OS as a function of TET3 and TDG expression.
The levels of TET3 and TDG mRNAs correlated inversely with DFS in patients treated with anthracyclines. Higher levels of TET3 and TDG mRNAs correlated with better DFS (P = 0.026 and 0.030, respectively).
Multivariate analysis of DFS and OS in patients treated with anthracyclines.
| DFS | OS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | P value | HR (95% CI) | P value | |
| TET1 | 1.653 (0.880–3.108) | 0.118 | 2.682 (0.850–8.460) | 0.092 |
| TET2 | 1.817 (0.964–3.422) | 0.065 | 2.249 (0.717–7.058) | 0.165 |
| TET3 | 1.944 (1.029–3.672) | 0.040 | 1.902 (0.617–5.867) | 0.263 |
| TDG | 2.178 (1.140–4.163) | 0.018 | 1.902 (0.639–5.665) | 0.248 |