| Literature DB >> 26205274 |
Li Wang1, Qunfeng Niu2, Yanbo Hui3, Huali Jin4.
Abstract
In this study, an application of a voltammetric electronic tongue for discrimination and prediction of different varieties of rice was investigated. Different pretreatment methods were selected, which were subsequently used for the discrimination of different varieties of rice and prediction of unknown rice samples. To this aim, a voltammetric array of sensors based on metallic electrodes was used as the sensing part. The different samples were analyzed by cyclic voltammetry with two sample-pretreatment methods. Discriminant Factorial Analysis was used to visualize the different categories of rice samples; however, radial basis function (RBF) artificial neural network with leave-one-out cross-validation method was employed for prediction modeling. The collected signal data were first compressed employing fast Fourier transform (FFT) and then significant features were extracted from the voltammetric signals. The experimental results indicated that the sample solutions obtained by the non-crushed pretreatment method could efficiently meet the effect of discrimination and recognition. The satisfactory prediction results of voltammetric electronic tongue based on RBF artificial neural network were obtained with less than five-fold dilution of the sample solution. The main objective of this study was to develop primary research on the application of an electronic tongue system for the discrimination and prediction of solid foods and provide an objective assessment tool for the food industry.Entities:
Keywords: Discriminant Factorial Analysis; cyclic voltammetry; discrimination; fast Fourier transform; radial basis function neural network; rice; variety prediction; voltammetric electronic tongue
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26205274 PMCID: PMC4541958 DOI: 10.3390/s150717767
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Experimental samples with different four varieties.
| Brand | Rice Varieties | Working Electrode Array |
|---|---|---|
| JiaHe | JiaHe66 | Pt |
| JiaHe | JiaHe218 | Au |
| XiuShui | XiuShui134 | Pd |
| XiuShui | XiuShui128 | Ag |
Comparison of average fc with number of FFT coefficients for non-crushed rice samples.
| Number of Selected FFT Coefficients | fc | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pt | Ag | Au | Pd | |
| FFT-4 | 0.8621 | 0.8004 | 0.7829 | 0.7863 |
| FFT-8 | 0.8871 | 0.8106 | 0.8460 | 0.8368 |
| FFT-16 | 0.9024 | 0.8126 | 0.9012 | 0.8482 |
| FFT-32 | 0.9082 | 0.8183 | 0.9122 | 0.8565 |
| FFT-64 | 0.9120 | 0.8192 | 0.9162 | 0.8587 |
Figure 1Voltammograms of four crushed rice sample solutions obtained using four electrodes. (a) Pt electrode; (b) Ag electrode; (c) Au electrode; (d) Pd electrode.
Figure 2Voltammograms of four non-crushed rice sample solutions obtained using four electrodes. (a) Pt electrode; (b) Ag electrode; (c) Au electrode; (d) Pd electrode.
Figure 3Current-time amplified charts of four working electrodes obtained with one time data collection for four crushed rice sample solutions. (a) Pt electrode; (b) Ag electrode; (c) Au electrode; (d) Pd electrode.
Figure 4Current-time amplified charts of four working electrodes obtained with one time data collection for four non-crushed rice sample solutions. (a) Pt electrode; (b) Ag electrode; (c) Au electrode; (d) Pd electrode.
Classical discriminant analysis results for rice solutions.
| Function | Crushed | Non-Crushed | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eigenvalue | Contribution | Correlation | Eigenvalue | Contribution | Correlation | |
| D1 | 177.630 | 86.8% | 0.997 | 1743.571 | 94.1% | 1.000 |
| D2 | 32.034 | 99.7% | 0.985 | 13.982 | 98.5% | 0.996 |
| D3 | 0.041 | 100.0% | 0.198 | 0.541 | 100.0% | 0.593 |
Figure 5Discrimination of rice sample solutions by employing DFA analysis. (a) Crushed rice; (b) Non-crushed rice. (Ο) XiuShui134, (*) XiuShui128, (⊿) JiaHe218, and (Δ) JiaHe66, also the centroid of each class is plotted (+).
Prediction results of RBF neural network using leave-one-out cross validation approach.
| Dilution Times | Expected | Predicted | Sensitivity | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XiuShui134 | XiuShui128 | JiaHe218 | JiaHe66 | Accuracy | Specificity | |||
| 0 | XiuShui134 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 95% | 98.3% | 95% |
| XiuShui128 | 0 | 18 | 0 | 2 | ||||
| JiaHe218 | 1 | 0 | 19 | 0 | ||||
| JiaHe66 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 19 | ||||
| 5 | XiuShui134 | 18 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 85% | 95% | 85% |
| XiuShui128 | 1 | 16 | 0 | 3 | ||||
| JiaHe218 | 2 | 0 | 17 | 1 | ||||
| JiaHe66 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 17 | ||||
| 10 | XiuShui134 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 45% | 81.7% | 45% |
| XiuShui128 | 0 | 7 | 6 | 7 | ||||
| JiaHe218 | 6 | 0 | 10 | 4 | ||||
| JiaHe66 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 9 | ||||
| 100 | XiuShui134 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 7.5% | 69.2% | 7.5% |
| XiuShui128 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 10 | ||||
| JiaHe218 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| JiaHe66 | 3 | 12 | 4 | 1 | ||||