| Literature DB >> 26204428 |
Alexander G Shard1, Rasmus Havelund1, Steve J Spencer1, Ian S Gilmore1, Morgan R Alexander2, Tina B Angerer3, Satoka Aoyagi4, Jean-Paul Barnes5,6, Anass Benayad5,7, Andrzej Bernasik8, Giacomo Ceccone9, Jonathan D P Counsell10, Christopher Deeks11, John S Fletcher3, Daniel J Graham12, Christian Heuser13, Tae Geol Lee14, Camille Marie5,6, Mateusz M Marzec8, Gautam Mishra15, Derk Rading16, Olivier Renault5,6, David J Scurr2, Hyun Kyong Shon14, Valentina Spampinato17, Hua Tian18, Fuyi Wang19, Nicholas Winograd18, Kui Wu19, Andreas Wucher13, Yufan Zhou20, Zihua Zhu20, Vanina Cristaudo, Claude Poleunis.
Abstract
We report the results of a VAMAS (Versailles Project on Advanced Materials and Standards) interlaboratory study on the measurement of composition in organic depth profiling. Layered samples with known binary compositions of Irganox 1010 and either Irganox 1098 or Fmoc-pentafluoro-l-phenylalanine in each layer were manufactured in a single batch and distributed to more than 20 participating laboratories. The samples were analyzed using argon cluster ion sputtering and either X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) or time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS) to generate depth profiles. Participants were asked to estimate the volume fractions in two of the layers and were provided with the compositions of all other layers. Participants using XPS provided volume fractions within 0.03 of the nominal values. Participants using ToF-SIMS either made no attempt, or used various methods that gave results ranging in error from 0.02 to over 0.10 in volume fraction, the latter representing a 50% relative error for a nominal volume fraction of 0.2. Error was predominantly caused by inadequacy in the ability to compensate for primary ion intensity variations and the matrix effect in SIMS. Matrix effects in these materials appear to be more pronounced as the number of atoms in both the primary analytical ion and the secondary ion increase. Using the participants' data we show that organic SIMS matrix effects can be measured and are remarkably consistent between instruments. We provide recommendations for identifying and compensating for matrix effects. Finally, we demonstrate, using a simple normalization method, that virtually all ToF-SIMS participants could have obtained estimates of volume fraction that were at least as accurate and consistent as XPS.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26204428 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b05625
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Phys Chem B ISSN: 1520-5207 Impact factor: 2.991