Literature DB >> 26203347

Ultrasonic propulsion of kidney stones: preliminary results of human feasibility study.

Michael Bailey1, Bryan Cunitz1, Barbrina Dunmire1, Marla Paun1, Franklin Lee2, Susan Ross2, James Lingeman3, Michael Coburn4, Hunter Wessells2, Mathew Sorensen5, Jonathan Harper2.   

Abstract

One in 11 Americans has experienced kidney stones, with a 50% average recurrence rate within 5-10 years. Ultrasonic propulsion (UP) offers a potential method to expel small stones or residual fragments before they become a recurrent problem. Reported here are preliminary findings from the first investigational use of UP in humans. The device uses a Verasonics ultrasound engine and Philips HDI C5-2 probe to generate real-time B-mode imaging and targeted "push" pulses on demand. There are three arms of the study: de novo stones, post-lithotripsy fragments, and the preoperative setting. A pain questionnaire is completed prior to and following the study. Movement is classified based on extent. Patients are followed for 90 days. Ten subjects have been treated to date: three de novo, five post-lithotripsy, and two preoperative. None of the subjects reported pain associated with the treatment or a treatment related adverse event, beyond the normal discomfort of passing a stone. At least one stone was moved in all subjects. Three of five post-lithotripsy subjects passed a single or multiple stones within 1-2 weeks following treatment; one subject passed two (1-2 mm) fragments before leaving clinic. In the pre-operative studies we successfully moved 7 - 8 mm stones. In four subjects, UP revealed multiple stone fragments where the clinical image and initial ultrasound examination indicated a single large stone.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical trial; kidney stone; shock wave lithotripsy; ultrasonic propulsion; ultrasound

Year:  2014        PMID: 26203347      PMCID: PMC4507572          DOI: 10.1109/ULTSYM.2014.0126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Int Ultrason Symp        ISSN: 1948-5719


  15 in total

1.  Correlation between twinkling artifact and color Doppler carrier frequency: preliminary observations in renal calculi.

Authors:  Jing Gao; Keith Hentel; Jonathan M Rubin
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 2.  The first kidney stone.

Authors:  J Uribarri; M S Oh; H J Carroll
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1989-12-15       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Content and face validation of a curriculum for ultrasonic propulsion of calculi in a human renal model.

Authors:  Ryan S Hsi; Barbrina Dunmire; Bryan W Cunitz; Xuemei He; Mathew D Sorensen; Jonathan D Harper; Michael R Bailey; Thomas S Lendvay
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States.

Authors:  Charles D Scales; Alexandria C Smith; Janet M Hanley; Christopher S Saigal
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Prospective, randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi 1 cm or less.

Authors:  Margaret S Pearle; James E Lingeman; Raymond Leveillee; Ramsay Kuo; Glenn M Preminger; Robert B Nadler; Joseph Macaluso; Manoj Monga; Udaya Kumar; John Dushinski; David M Albala; J Stuart Wolf; Dean Assimos; Michael Fabrizio; Larry C Munch; Stephen Y Nakada; Brian Auge; John Honey; Kenneth Ogan; John Pattaras; Elspeth M McDougall; Timothy D Averch; Thomas Turk; Paul Pietrow; Stephanie Watkins
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Comparison of tissue injury from focused ultrasonic propulsion of kidney stones versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Bret A Connors; Andrew P Evan; Philip M Blomgren; Ryan S Hsi; Jonathan D Harper; Mathew D Sorensen; Yak-Nam Wang; Julianna C Simon; Marla Paun; Frank Starr; Bryan W Cunitz; Michael R Bailey; James E Lingeman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Evidence for trapped surface bubbles as the cause for the twinkling artifact in ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Wei Lu; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Michael R Bailey; Peter J Kaczkowski; Lawrence A Crum
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Comparative effectiveness of shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for treating patients with kidney stones.

Authors:  Charles D Scales; Julie C Lai; Andrew W Dick; Jan M Hanley; Jeroen van Meijgaard; Claude M Setodji; Christopher S Saigal
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 14.766

9.  Impact of Residual Fragments following Endourological Treatments in Renal Stones.

Authors:  Cenk Acar; Cag Cal
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2012-07-05

10.  Focused ultrasound to displace renal calculi: threshold for tissue injury.

Authors:  Yak-Nam Wang; Julianna C Simon; Bryan W Cunitz; Frank L Starr; Marla Paun; Denny H Liggitt; Andrew P Evan; James A McAteer; Ziyue Liu; Barbrina Dunmire; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  J Ther Ultrasound       Date:  2014-03-31
View more
  3 in total

1.  Multi-resolution simulation of focused ultrasound propagation through ovine skull from a single-element transducer.

Authors:  Kyungho Yoon; Wonhye Lee; Phillip Croce; Amanda Cammalleri; Seung-Schik Yoo
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 2.  Evaluation of dusting versus basketing - can new technologies improve stone-free rates?

Authors:  Brian Weiss; Ojas Shah
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  Kidney stones.

Authors:  Saeed R Khan; Margaret S Pearle; William G Robertson; Giovanni Gambaro; Benjamin K Canales; Steeve Doizi; Olivier Traxer; Hans-Göran Tiselius
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 52.329

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.