Literature DB >> 26203340

High quality draft genome sequence of Brachymonas chironomi AIMA4(T) (DSM 19884(T)) isolated from a Chironomus sp. egg mass.

Sivan Laviad1, Alla Lapidus2, James Han3, Matthew Haynes3, Tbk Reddy3, Marcel Huntemann3, Amrita Pati3, Natalia N Ivanova3, Konstantinos Mavromatis3, Elke Lang4, Manfred Rohde5, Victor Markowitz6, Tanja Woyke3, Hans-Peter Klenk4, Nikos C Kyrpides7, Malka Halpern8.   

Abstract

Brachymonas chironomi strain AIMA4(T) (Halpern et al., 2009) is a Gram-negative, non-motile, aerobic, chemoorganotroph bacterium. B. chironomi is a member of the Comamonadaceae, a family within the class Betaproteobacteria. This species was isolated from a chironomid (Diptera; Chironomidae) egg mass, sampled from a waste stabilization pond in northern Israel. Phylogenetic analysis based on the 16S rRNA gene sequences placed strain AIMA4(T) in the genus Brachymonas. Here we describe the features of this organism, together with the complete genome sequence and annotation. The DNA GC content is 63.5%. The chromosome length is 2,509,395 bp. It encodes 2,382 proteins and 68 RNA genes. Brachymonas chironomi genome is part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Type Strains, Phase I: the one thousand microbial genomes (KMG) project.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brachymonas chironomi; Chironomid; Chironomus; Comamonadaceae; Egg mass; Toxicant

Year:  2015        PMID: 26203340      PMCID: PMC4511610          DOI: 10.1186/s40793-015-0010-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

Strain AIMA4T (= LGM 24400T = DSM 19884T), is the type strain of , one out of two species in the genus . The genus was formed by Hiraishi et al. [1] while characterizing rhodoquinone-containing bacteria that had been isolated from soybean crude waste sludge in Japan. Strain AIMA4T, was isolated from an insect egg mass (Chironomus sp.) that was sampled from a waste stabilization pond in northern Israel [2]. Chironomids (Arthropoda; Insecta; Diptera; Chironomidae; Chironomus sp.) inhabit virtually every type and condition of aquatic habitats. They undergo a complete metamorphosis of four life stages (egg, larva, pupa and adult that emerges into the air) [3]. Eggs are laid in an egg mass at the water’s edge. Each egg mass contains hundreds of eggs. Chironomid egg masses were found to harbor and spp. [3]-[10]. degrades chironomid egg masses by the secreted haemagglutinin protease (HAP) [11],[12]. Strain AIMA4T was isolated in the course of a study that investigated endogenous bacterial communities that inhabit chironomid egg masses [2],[13],[14]. The species epithet chironomi was derived from the non-biting midge insect Chironomus (Diptera; Chironomidae), from where this species was isolated. Strain AIMA4T didn’t show the ability to degrade the egg masses like it was found for . Here we describe a summary classification and a set of the features of strain AIMA4T (DSM 19884T), together with the genome sequence description and annotation.

Organism information

Classification and features

A taxonomic study using a polyphasic approach placed strain AIMA4T in the genus within the family (Figure 1). The family comprises a larger number of genera (as shown in Figure 1) and a larger variety of species and phenotypes [15],[16].
Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of Brachymonas chironomi relative to the type strains of the other species within the family Comamonadaceae. The sequence alignments were performed by using the CLUSTAL W program and the tree was generated using the maximum likelihood method in MEGA 5 software. Bootstrap values (from 1,000 replicates) greater than 50% are shown at the branch points. The bar indicates a 1% sequence divergence.

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of Brachymonas chironomi relative to the type strains of the other species within the family Comamonadaceae. The sequence alignments were performed by using the CLUSTAL W program and the tree was generated using the maximum likelihood method in MEGA 5 software. Bootstrap values (from 1,000 replicates) greater than 50% are shown at the branch points. The bar indicates a 1% sequence divergence. strain AIMA4T is a Gram-negative, non-motile coccobacillus or rod (Figure 2). After 48 h incubation on LB agar at 30°C, colonies are beige colored (opaque) that turn to light brown after few days of incubation. Strain AIMA4T is aerobic, chemoorganotrophic and does not produce acid from carbohydrates (including glucose) [2]. Growth is observed at 18–37°C (optimum 30°C), with 0–2.5% (w/v) NaCl (optimum 0.5% NaCl) and at pH 5.0–9.0 (optimum pH 6.0–8.0) (Table 1). The following enzymatic activities were observed in strain AIMA4T: catalase and oxidase, alkaline and acid phosphatases, esterase (C4), esterase lipase (C8), leucine arylamidase, valine arylamidase, trypsin and naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase. Strain AIMA4T produces acetoin and reduces nitrate to nitrite [2].
Figure 2

Scanning electron micrograph of B.chironomi AIMA4T.

Table 1

Classification and general features ofBrachymonas chironomi strain AIMA4Taccording to the MIGS recommendations [[40]], published by the Genome Standards Consortium [[41]] and the Names for Life database [[42]]

MIGS IDPropertyTermEvidence code a
 ClassificationDomain BacteriaTAS [43]
  Phylum ProteobacteriaTAS [44]
  Class BetaproteobacteriaTAS [45]
  Order BurkholderialesTAS [46]
  Family ComamonadaceaeTAS [47]
  Genus BrachymonasTAS [1]
  Species Brachymonas chironomiTAS [2]
  Type strain AIMA4TTAS [2]
 Gram stainNegativeTAS [2]
 Cell shapeCoccobacilli or rodsTAS [2]
 MotilityNon-motileTAS [2]
 SporulationNon-sporulatingIDS
 Temperature range18-37°CTAS [2]
 Optimum temperature30°CTAS [2]
 pH range; Optimum5.0–9.0; 6.0–8.0TAS [2]
 Carbon sourcebphenylacetic acidTAS [2]
MIGS-6HabitatAquatic/Insect hostTAS [2]
MIGS-6.3Salinity0-2.5% NaCl (w/v)TAS [2]
MIGS-22Oxygen requirementAerobicTAS [2]
MIGS-15Biotic relationshipCommensal (Insect, chironomid)TAS [2]
MIGS-14PathogenicityNon-pathogenNAS
MIGS-4Geographic locationIsraelTAS [2]
MIGS-5Sample collectionJuly, 2006TAS [2]
MIGS-4.1Latitude32.669167TAS [2]
MIGS-4.2Longitude35.128639TAS [2]
MIGS-4.4Altitude40 mTAS [2]

aEvidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay; TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). Evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [48].

bThe only carbon source that was positive for this strain, out of all carbon sources that were tested (strain AIMA4T does not use carbohydrates, not even glucose) [2].

Scanning electron micrograph of B.chironomi AIMA4T. Classification and general features ofBrachymonas chironomi strain AIMA4Taccording to the MIGS recommendations [[40]], published by the Genome Standards Consortium [[41]] and the Names for Life database [[42]] aEvidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay; TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). Evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [48]. bThe only carbon source that was positive for this strain, out of all carbon sources that were tested (strain AIMA4T does not use carbohydrates, not even glucose) [2].

Chemotaxonomic data

The dominant cellular fatty acids are C16:1ω7c, C16:0 and C18:1ω7c. The main isoprenoid quinone is Q-8. Phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine and phosphatidylserine occur as polar lipids [2].

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position [17]-[19]. Sequencing of strain AIMA4T is part of Genomic Encyclopedia of Type Strains, Phase I: the one thousand microbial genomes project [20] which aims in increasing the sequencing coverage of key reference microbial genomes [21]. The genome project is deposited in the Genomes OnLine Database [22] and the permanent draft genome sequence is deposited in GenBank. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI) using state of the art sequencing technology [23]. A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Genome sequencing project information

MIGS IDPropertyTerm
MIGS 31Finishing qualityLevel 2: High-Quality Draft
MIGS-28Libraries usedIllumina Std. shotgun library
MIGS 29Sequencing platformsIllumina HiSeq 2000
MIGS 31.2Fold coverage99.6×
MIGS 30AssemblersVelvet v. 1.1.04, ALLPATHS v. R37654
MIGS 32Gene calling methodProdigal 2.5
 Locus TagC513
 GenBank IDARGE00000000
 GenBank Date of ReleaseSeptember 16, 2013
 GOLD IDGp0013605
 BIOPROJECT174982
MIGS 13Source Material IdentifierDSM 19884T
 Project relevanceTree of Life, GEBA-KMG
Genome sequencing project information

Growth conditions and genomic DNA preparation

strain AIMA4T, DSM 19884T, was grown in DSMZ medium 1 (Nutrient Agar), at 28°C [24]. DNA was isolated from 0.5-1 g of cell paste using JetFlex Genomic DNA Purification Kit (GENOMED) following the standard protocol as recommended by the manufacturer, however with additional 50 μl protease K (20 mg/ml) during digest for 60 min. at 58°C. Protein precipitation was done with additional 200 μl Protein Precipitation Buffer, followed by over night incubation on ice. DNA is available through the DNA Bank Network [25].

Genome sequencing and assembly

The draft genome of strain AIMA4T was generated using the Illumina technology [23],[26]. An Illumina standard shotgun library was constructed and sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform which generated 14,014,260 reads totaling 2,102.1 Mb. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing performed at the JGI can be found at the institute website [27]. All raw Illumina sequence data was passed through DUK, a filtering program developed at JGI, which removes known Illumina sequencing and library preparation artifacts [28]. Following steps were then performed for assembly: (1) filtered Illumina reads were assembled using Velvet [29], (2) 1–3 Kbp simulated paired end reads were created from Velvet Contigs using wgsim [30], (3) Illumina reads were assembled with simulated read pairs using Allpaths–LG [31]. Parameters for assembly steps were: (1) Velvet (velveth: 63 –shortPaired and velvetg: −very clean yes –export-Filtered yes –min contig lgth 500 –scaffolding no –cov cutoff 10) (2) wgsim (−e 0 –1 100 –2 100 –r 0 –R 0 –X 0) (3) Allpaths–LG (PrepareAllpathsInputs: PHRED 64 = 1 PLOIDY = 1 FRAG COVERAGE = 125 JUMP COVERAGE = 25 LONG JUMP COV = 50, RunAllpathsLG: THREADS = 8 RUN = std shredpairs TARGETS = standard VAPI WARN ONLY = True OVERWRITE = True). The final draft assembly contained 36 contigs in 36 scaffolds. The total size of the genome is 2.5 Mbp and the final assembly is based on 249.2 Mbp of Illumina data, which provides an average 99.6 × coverage of the genome.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [32] as part of the DOE-JGI genome annotation pipeline [33],[34], following by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline [35]. The predicted CDSs were translated and searched against the Integrated Microbial Genomes (IMG) non-redundant database, UniProt, TIGERFam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. These data sources were combined to assert a product description for each predicted protein. Additional gene prediction analysis and functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes-Expert Review (IMG-ER) platform [36].

Genome properties

The assembly of the draft genome sequence consists of 36 scaffolds amounting to 2,509,395 bp, and the G + C content is 63.5% (Table 3). Of the 2,450 genes predicted, 2,382 were protein-coding genes, and 68 RNAs. The majority of the protein-coding genes (85.5%) were assigned a putative function while the remaining ones were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.
Table 3

Genome statistics

AttributeValue% of Total
Genome size (bp)2,509,395100.00%
DNA coding (bp)2,294,42791.43%
DNA G + C (bp)1,593,93563.52%
DNA scaffolds36100.00%
Total genes2,450100.00%
Protein coding genes2,38297.22%
RNA genes682.78%
Pseudo genes00
Genes in internal clusters1,78872.98%
Genes with function prediction2,09585.51%
Genes assigned to COGs1,82974.65%
Genes with Pfam domains2,12986.90%
Genes with signal peptides1716.98%
Genes with transmembrane helices50520.61%
CRISPR repeats00
Table 4

Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories

CodeValue% ageDescription
J1497.44Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A10.05RNA processing and modification
K1045.19Transcription
L1065.29Replication, recombination and repair
B10.05Chromatin structure and dynamics
D261.30Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning
V321.60Defense mechanisms
T603.00Signal transduction mechanisms
M1226.09Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis
N150.75Cell motility
U603.00Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport
O954.75Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C1376.84Energy production and conversion
G663.30Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E1829.09Amino acid transport and metabolism
F542.70Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H1135.64Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I1035.14Lipid transport and metabolism
P1155.74Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q522.60Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R22711.34General function prediction only
S1808.99Function unknown
-62125.35Not in COGs
Genome statistics Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories

Insights from the genome sequence

Strain AIMA4T was isolated from chironomid egg masses. Using pyrosequencing method, we have recently shown that the prevalence of in the endogenous bacterial communities of chironomid egg masses and larva was 0.04% and 0.006%, respectively [37]. Chironomid tolerance towards pollution is well documented [38]. Senderovich and Halpern [37],[39], demonstrated by using Koch’s postulates that endogenous bacteria in chironomids have a role in protecting the insect from toxicants. Although was isolated from chironomid egg masses, its features regarding its protective potential have never been examined. Nevertheless, its genome reveals the potential of this species to protect its host in polluted environments. Genes encoding arsenate detoxification are present in strain AIMA4T. These genes include an arsenical resistance gene cluster with candidates for transcriptional regulator, ArsR; arsenical resistance operon trans-acting repressor, ArsD; arsenite efflux ATP-binding protein, ArsA and a hypothetical arsenic resistance protein (ACR3 family). A gene for arsenate reductase (ArsC family) is present in a different operon. More genes which may indicate the potential of this bacterium to tolerate or detoxify metals are: copper resistance protein D, CopD; copper chaperone, copper-resistance protein, CopA; copper (or silver) translocating P-type ATPase; uncharacterized lipoprotein NlpE involved in copper resistance; magnesium Mg(2+) and cobalt Co(2+) transport protein, CorA. Moreover, two genes encoding ABC-type transport system involved in resistance to organic solvents, auxiliary and periplasmic components are also present. The genome of strain AIMA4T reveals the potential of the species to produce a polysaccharide capsule. It includes two gene clusters with candidates for capsule polysaccharide export protein, periplasmic protein involved in polysaccharide export, ABC-type polysaccharide/polyol phosphate transport system, ATPase component, ABC-type polysaccharide/polyol phosphate export systems, permease component and predicted glycosyltransferase involved in capsule biosynthesis. Another feature that is found in the genome of AIMA4T is its potential to produce a pilus (or pili). The following predicted genes indicate this ability; type IV pilus assembly protein PilB; type IV pilus secretin PilQ; Tfp pilus assembly proteins PilP, PilO and PilV; type IV prepilin peptidase; prepilin-type N-terminal cleavage/methylation domain and pilus retraction ATPase PilT (indicating the ability of twitching motility). Tolerance of 2.5% NaCl was described for strain AIMA4T by Halpern et al. [2]. The presence of ABC-type proline/glycine betaine transport system in the genome may explain the way this species can tolerate high salt concentrations. In respect to the ampicillin (beta-lactam) antibiotic resistance, the genome encodes one beta-lactamase class B and a negative regulator of beta-lactamase expression. Three genes encoding two component transcriptional regulators (LuxR family), can be found in the genome of strain AIMA4T and demonstrate quorum sensing skills.

Conclusions

In the current study, we characterized the genome of strain AIMA4T that was isolated from a chironomid egg mass [2]. belongs to the family (order Bukholderiales; class ) (Figure 1). Members of this family are known for their ability to cope with harsh environmental condition such as high concentration of toxic metals and other pollutants like aromatic compounds or polymers [e.g. poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) [16]. Likewise, the genome of strain AIMA4T reveals the potential of this species to cope with toxic metals. These demonstrate that may have a role in protecting its aquatic host (chironomids) in polluted environments.

Abbreviations

KMG: One thousand microbial genomes PHBV: Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate)

Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

MH (Halpern) isolated and characterized strain B. chironomi AIMA4T; SL, MH (Halpern), HPK and NCK drafted the manuscript. AL, JH, MH (Haynes), TBKR, MH (Huntemann), AP, NNI, KM, VM and TW sequenced, assembled and annotated the genome. EL provided the biomass for DNA extraction and collected data about the organism. MR performed electron microscopy. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
  35 in total

1.  GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Amrita Pati; Natalia N Ivanova; Natalia Mikhailova; Galina Ovchinnikova; Sean D Hooper; Athanasios Lykidis; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-05-02       Impact factor: 28.547

2.  Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs.

Authors:  Daniel R Zerbino; Ewan Birney
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Vibrio cholerae hemagglutinin/protease degrades chironomid egg masses.

Authors:  Malka Halpern; Hanan Gancz; Meir Broza; Yechezkel Kashi
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Brachymonas chironomi sp. nov., isolated from a chironomid egg mass, and emended description of the genus Brachymonas.

Authors:  Malka Halpern; Tamar Shakèd; Peter Schumann
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 2.747

5.  A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopaedia of Bacteria and Archaea.

Authors:  Dongying Wu; Philip Hugenholtz; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Rüdiger Pukall; Eileen Dalin; Natalia N Ivanova; Victor Kunin; Lynne Goodwin; Martin Wu; Brian J Tindall; Sean D Hooper; Amrita Pati; Athanasios Lykidis; Stefan Spring; Iain J Anderson; Patrik D'haeseleer; Adam Zemla; Mitchell Singer; Alla Lapidus; Matt Nolan; Alex Copeland; Cliff Han; Feng Chen; Jan-Fang Cheng; Susan Lucas; Cheryl Kerfeld; Elke Lang; Sabine Gronow; Patrick Chain; David Bruce; Edward M Rubin; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk; Jonathan A Eisen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification.

Authors:  Dawn Field; George Garrity; Tanya Gray; Norman Morrison; Jeremy Selengut; Peter Sterk; Tatiana Tatusova; Nicholas Thomson; Michael J Allen; Samuel V Angiuoli; Michael Ashburner; Nelson Axelrod; Sandra Baldauf; Stuart Ballard; Jeffrey Boore; Guy Cochrane; James Cole; Peter Dawyndt; Paul De Vos; Claude DePamphilis; Robert Edwards; Nadeem Faruque; Robert Feldman; Jack Gilbert; Paul Gilna; Frank Oliver Glöckner; Philip Goldstein; Robert Guralnick; Dan Haft; David Hancock; Henning Hermjakob; Christiane Hertz-Fowler; Phil Hugenholtz; Ian Joint; Leonid Kagan; Matthew Kane; Jessie Kennedy; George Kowalchuk; Renzo Kottmann; Eugene Kolker; Saul Kravitz; Nikos Kyrpides; Jim Leebens-Mack; Suzanna E Lewis; Kelvin Li; Allyson L Lister; Phillip Lord; Natalia Maltsev; Victor Markowitz; Jennifer Martiny; Barbara Methe; Ilene Mizrachi; Richard Moxon; Karen Nelson; Julian Parkhill; Lita Proctor; Owen White; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Andrew Spiers; Robert Stevens; Paul Swift; Chris Taylor; Yoshio Tateno; Adrian Tett; Sarah Turner; David Ussery; Bob Vaughan; Naomi Ward; Trish Whetzel; Ingio San Gil; Gareth Wilson; Anil Wipat
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 54.908

7.  The Genomic Standards Consortium.

Authors:  Dawn Field; Linda Amaral-Zettler; Guy Cochrane; James R Cole; Peter Dawyndt; George M Garrity; Jack Gilbert; Frank Oliver Glöckner; Lynette Hirschman; Ilene Karsch-Mizrachi; Hans-Peter Klenk; Rob Knight; Renzo Kottmann; Nikos Kyrpides; Folker Meyer; Inigo San Gil; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Lynn M Schriml; Peter Sterk; Tatiana Tatusova; David W Ussery; Owen White; John Wooley
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  Genomic Encyclopedia of Type Strains, Phase I: The one thousand microbial genomes (KMG-I) project.

Authors:  Nikos C Kyrpides; Tanja Woyke; Jonathan A Eisen; George Garrity; Timothy G Lilburn; Brian J Beck; William B Whitman; Phil Hugenholtz; Hans-Peter Klenk
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2013-12-17

9.  Bacterial community composition associated with chironomid egg masses.

Authors:  Yigal Senderovich; Malka Halpern
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.857

10.  Improving microbial genome annotations in an integrated database context.

Authors:  I-Min A Chen; Victor M Markowitz; Ken Chu; Iain Anderson; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Nikos C Kyrpides; Natalia N Ivanova
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.