Literature DB >> 26202411

Hepatocellular carcinoma 20 mm or smaller in cirrhosis patients: early magnetic resonance enhancement by gadoxetic acid compared with gadopentetate dimeglumine.

Cai-Zhong Chen1,2, Sheng-Xiang Rao3,4, Ying Ding5,6, Shu-Jie Zhang7,8, Feng Li9, Qiang Gao10, Meng-Su Zeng11,12.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the differences in enhancement pattern of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) 20 mm or smaller and enhancement effects of hepatic vessels on early dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) obtained with gadoxetic acid and gadopentetate dimeglumine in the same patients with cirrhosis.
METHODS: We reviewed MR images using gadoxetic acid and gadopentetate dimeglumine in the same 34 patients with 42 histologically confirmed HCCs (median diameter, 14.5 mm). The percentage enhancements (PEs) of HCC, the hepatic artery and portal vein and relative contrasts (RCs) between HCC and the liver were calculated and analyzed statistically.
RESULTS: The PEs of HCC, the hepatic artery and portal vein were significantly lower for gadoxetic acid in comparison with gadopentetate dimeglumine in the arterial phase (p = 0.0256 for HCC, p < 0.0001 for hepatic artery) and portal phase (p < 0.0001 for HCC, portal vein). The RC between HCC and the liver was significantly lower for gadoxetic acid in comparison with gadopentetate dimeglumine in the arterial phase (p = 0.0422), but was not significantly different in the portal phase (p = 0.1133). Forty-one of the 42 (97.62 %) nodules showed arterial hypervascularization. Of these, 31 (75.61 %) nodules were hypointense in the portal phase for gadoxetic acid, and 22 (53.66 %) were hypointense for gadopentetate dimeglumine (p = 0.038).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with gadopentetate dimeglumine, gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI demonstrated a different enhancement pattern of inferior arterial enhancement and was more rapidly hypointense in the portal phase for HCC. It showed markedly lower enhancement for hepatic artery and portal vein in the patients with cirrhosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carcinoma; Comparative study; Gadopentetate dimeglumine; Gadoxetic acid; Hepatocellular; Magnetic resonance imaging

Year:  2013        PMID: 26202411     DOI: 10.1007/s12072-013-9467-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatol Int        ISSN: 1936-0533            Impact factor:   6.047


  23 in total

1.  Quantification of pulmonary blood flow and volume in healthy volunteers by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging using a parallel imaging technique.

Authors:  Konstantin Nikolaou; Stefan O Schoenberg; Gunnar Brix; Jeffrey P Goldman; Ulrike Attenberger; Bernd Kuehn; Olaf Dietrich; Maximilian F Reiser
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 2.  Contrast agents for MR imaging of the liver.

Authors:  N Cem Balci; Richard C Semelka
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  Comparison of magnetic properties of MRI contrast media solutions at different magnetic field strengths.

Authors:  Martin Rohrer; Hans Bauer; Jan Mintorovitch; Martin Requardt; Hanns-Joachim Weinmann
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 6.016

4.  Imaging characteristics of hepatocellular carcinoma using the hepatobiliary contrast agent Gd-EOB-DTPA.

Authors:  G Jung; J Breuer; L W Poll; J A Koch; T Balzer; S Chang; U Mödder
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.990

Review 5.  Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI of the liver: part 2, protocol optimization and lesion appearance in the cirrhotic liver.

Authors:  Irene Cruite; Michael Schroeder; Elmar M Merkle; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Viral-induced cirrhosis: grading of severity using MR imaging.

Authors:  K Ito; D G Mitchell; H W Hann; Y Kim; T Fujita; H Okazaki; K Honjo; N Matsunaga
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Arterial enhancement of hepatocellular carcinoma before radiofrequency ablation as a predictor of postablation local tumor progression.

Authors:  Yulri Park; Young-Sun Kim; Hyunchul Rhim; Hyo Keun Lim; Dongil Choi; Won Jae Lee
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Diagnosis of hepatic nodules 20 mm or smaller in cirrhosis: Prospective validation of the noninvasive diagnostic criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Alejandro Forner; Ramón Vilana; Carmen Ayuso; Lluís Bianchi; Manel Solé; Juan Ramón Ayuso; Loreto Boix; Margarita Sala; María Varela; Josep M Llovet; Concepció Brú; Jordi Bruix
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 9.  Hepatobiliary contrast agents for contrast-enhanced MRI of the liver: properties, clinical development and applications.

Authors:  Peter Reimer; Günter Schneider; Wolfgang Schima
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-02-25       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Hepatocellular carcinoma: focus on different aspects of management.

Authors:  Sene Waly Raphael; Zhang Yangde; Chen Yuxiang
Journal:  ISRN Oncol       Date:  2012-05-13
View more
  4 in total

1.  The challenges of novel contrast agents for the imaging diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Carmen Ayuso; Jordi Bruix
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 6.047

2.  Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Primary Liver Cancer in China (2017 Edition).

Authors:  Jian Zhou; Hui-Chuan Sun; Zheng Wang; Wen-Ming Cong; Jian-Hua Wang; Meng-Su Zeng; Jia-Mei Yang; Ping Bie; Lian-Xin Liu; Tian-Fu Wen; Guo-Hong Han; Mao-Qiang Wang; Rui-Bao Liu; Li-Gong Lu; Zheng-Gang Ren; Min-Shan Chen; Zhao-Chong Zeng; Ping Liang; Chang-Hong Liang; Min Chen; Fu-Hua Yan; Wen-Ping Wang; Yuan Ji; Wen-Wu Cheng; Chao-Liu Dai; Wei-Dong Jia; Ya-Ming Li; Ye-Xiong Li; Jun Liang; Tian-Shu Liu; Guo-Yue Lv; Yi-Lei Mao; Wei-Xin Ren; Hong-Cheng Shi; Wen-Tao Wang; Xiao-Ying Wang; Bao-Cai Xing; Jian-Ming Xu; Jian-Yong Yang; Ye-Fa Yang; Sheng-Long Ye; Zheng-Yu Yin; Bo-Heng Zhang; Shui-Jun Zhang; Wei-Ping Zhou; Ji-Ye Zhu; Rong Liu; Ying-Hong Shi; Yong-Sheng Xiao; Zhi Dai; Gao-Jun Teng; Jian-Qiang Cai; Wei-Lin Wang; Jia-Hong Dong; Qiang Li; Feng Shen; Shu-Kui Qin; Jia Fan
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 11.740

Review 3.  Application of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Xue-Qin Li; Xing Wang; Da-Wei Zhao; Jun Sun; Jiao-Jiao Liu; Dong-Dong Lin; Guang Yang; Hui Liu; Zhen-Ying Xia; Cui-Yu Jia; Hong-Jun Li
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-08-22       Impact factor: 2.754

4.  A Semi-Automatic Step-by-Step Expert-Guided LI-RADS Grading System Based on Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Ruofan Sheng; Jing Huang; Weiguo Zhang; Kaipu Jin; Li Yang; Huanhuan Chong; Jia Fan; Jian Zhou; Dijia Wu; Mengsu Zeng
Journal:  J Hepatocell Carcinoma       Date:  2021-06-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.