Literature DB >> 26202332

Unplanned reoperations after microvascular free tissue transfer: An analysis of 2,244 patients using the american college of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program database.

Alvin C Kwok1, Jayant P Agarwal1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Our intent was to evaluate unplanned reoperations as a quality indicator for microvascular free tissue transfer (MFTT).
METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to identify MFTT cases from January 2012 to December 2013. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to determine risk factors for unplanned reoperations.
RESULTS: We identified 2,244 MFTT cases. There were 290 associated unplanned reoperations (12.92%). There was a threefold increase in the rate of complications when patients underwent reoperation (58.28% vs 18.12%, p < 0.0001). Head and neck reconstructions had the highest rate of reoperations (18.04%). Most reoperations were debridements (38.28%), followed by microvascular procedures (28.97%) and flap revisions (26.55%). American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) classification ≥3 [OR 1.565, 95% CI (1.204, 2.034), p = 0.0008] and prolonged operative time [OR 1.597, 95% CI (1.221, 2.089), p = 0.0006] were significant independent risk factors for reoperations.
CONCLUSIONS: Unplanned reoperations are a useful quality indicator for MFTT. ASA classification ≥3 and prolonged operative time were risk factors associated with an increased risk for unplanned reoperations.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery 37:184-189, 2017. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26202332     DOI: 10.1002/micr.22455

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microsurgery        ISSN: 0738-1085            Impact factor:   2.425


  5 in total

1.  Reconstruction with Free Flaps of Head and Neck Cancer Defects: A National Cohort Study.

Authors:  Giancarlo Buitrago; Felipe Caballero; Giovanni E Montealegre
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-08-19

2.  A Comparison of Common Plastic Surgery Operations Using the NSQIP and TOPS Databases.

Authors:  Jacob Veith; Willem Collier; Andrew Simpson; David Magno-Padron; Bruce Mast; Robert X Murphy; Jayant Agarwal; Alvin Kwok
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-05-27

3.  Unplanned reoperation after radical surgery for oral cancer: an analysis of risk factors and outcomes.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Hong Zhu; Pu Ye; Meng Wu
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 3.747

Review 4.  Scoping Review of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in Plastic Surgery Research.

Authors:  Haley F M Augustine; Jiayi Hu; Zainab Najarali; Matthew McRae
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2018-10-21       Impact factor: 0.947

5.  High-Risk Plastic Surgery: An Analysis of 108,303 Cases From the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP).

Authors:  Melissa Wan; Jacques X Zhang; Yichuan Ding; Yiwen Jin; Julie Bedford; Mahesh Nagarajan; Marija Bucevska; Douglas J Courtemanche; Jugpal S Arneja
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 0.947

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.