Literature DB >> 26202131

Providers contextualise care more often when they discover patient context by asking: meta-analysis of three primary data sets.

Alan Schwartz1, Saul J Weiner2, Amy Binns-Calvey3, Frances M Weaver4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: One important component of patient-centred care is provider incorporation of patient contextual factors-life circumstances relevant to their care-in managing the patient's health. The current study uses data sets collected from direct observation of care to examine if how a provider learns contextual information influences whether the provider incorporates the information into a care plan.
METHODS: Three data sets were reanalysed: a research study with physicians, a quality improvement project with physicians and a performance measurement project with telephone health assistants. In each data set, investigators compute rates of incorporation of patient contextual factors into the care plan for encounters in which factors were elicited in response to a probe by the provider versus revealed spontaneously by the patient. We report the rates, CIs and associated ORs for each study and overall using a random effects meta-analysis.
RESULTS: Providers elicited 57%, 49% and 30% of patient contextual factors identified in encounters in each data set. Patient contextual factors identified in response to probes were incorporated into the plan of care more frequently than those revealed spontaneously by patients (68% vs 46%, 71% vs 54% and 93% vs 77%, respectively). The summary OR for incorporation of patient contextual factors into the care plan when the factor was probed versus revealed spontaneously was 4.16 (95% CI 2.0 to 8.6). While this estimate was associated with significant heterogeneity (I(2)=76%), the ORs for the individual data sets were 2.53 (1.4 to 4.5), 6.25 (4.9 to 8.0) and 4.2 (0.9 to 19.3).
CONCLUSIONS: In encounters where addressing patient contextual factors may play an important role in care decisions, factors that are elicited actively by the provider are more likely to be incorporated in the care plan than factors revealed spontaneously by the patient. These differences in the care process associated with provider performance can only be demonstrated through direct observation. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decision making; Evaluation methodology; Patient-centred care; Performance measures; Quality measurement

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26202131     DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf        ISSN: 2044-5415            Impact factor:   7.035


  6 in total

1.  Shared decision making in preventive health care: What it is; what it is not.

Authors:  Roland Grad; France Légaré; Neil R Bell; James A Dickinson; Harminder Singh; Ainsley Elizabeth Moore; Danielle Kasperavicius; Kaylyn L Kretschmer
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.275

2. 

Authors:  Roland Grad; France Légaré; Neil R Bell; James A Dickinson; Harminder Singh; Ainsley Elizabeth Moore; Danielle Kasperavicius; Kaylyn L Kretschmer
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  How often do both core competencies of shared decision making occur in family medicine teaching clinics?

Authors:  Gisèle Diendéré; Selma Chipenda Dansokho; Rhéa Rocque; Anne-Sophie Julien; France Légaré; Luc Côté; Sonia Mahmoudi; Philippe Jacob; Natalia Arias Casais; Laurie Pilote; Roland Grad; Anik M C Giguère; Holly O Witteman
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Alerting Doctors About Patient Life Challenges: A Randomized Control Trial of a Previsit Inventory of Contextual Factors.

Authors:  Frances M Weaver; Amy Binns-Calvey; Beverly Gonzalez; Carol Kostovich; Sherri LaVela; Kevin T Stroupe; Brendan Kelly; Naomi Ashley; Scott Miskevics; Ben Gerber; Lisa Burkhart; Alan Schwartz; Saul J Weiner
Journal:  MDM Policy Pract       Date:  2019-05-27

5.  Talking about treatment benefits, harms, and what matters to patients in radiation oncology: an observational study.

Authors:  Laurie Pilote; Luc Côté; Selma Chipenda Dansokho; Émilie Brouillard; Anik M C Giguère; France Légaré; Roland Grad; Holly O Witteman
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 2.796

6.  Influence of doctor-patient conversations on behaviours of patients presenting to primary care with new or persistent symptoms: a video observation study.

Authors:  Dorothee Amelung; Katriina L Whitaker; Debby Lennard; Margaret Ogden; Jessica Sheringham; Yin Zhou; Fiona M Walter; Hardeep Singh; Charles Vincent; Georgia Black
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2019-07-20       Impact factor: 7.418

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.