| Literature DB >> 26200456 |
Sinéad Murphy1, Jonathan L Barber2, Jennifer A Learmonth3, Fiona L Read3, Robert Deaville1, Matthew W Perkins1, Andrew Brownlow4, Nick Davison4, Rod Penrose5, Graham J Pierce3, Robin J Law6, Paul D Jepson1.
Abstract
Reproductive failure in mammals due to exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) can occur either through endocrine disrupting effects or via immunosuppression and increased disease risk. To investigate further, full necropsies and determination of summed 25 polychlorinated biphenyls congeners (∑PCBs lipid weight) in blubber were undertaken on 329 UK-stranded female harbour porpoises (1990-2012). In sexually mature females, 25/127 (19.7%) showed direct evidence of reproductive failure (foetal death, aborting, dystocia or stillbirth). A further 21/127 (16.5%) had infections of the reproductive tract or tumours of reproductive tract tissues that could contribute to reproductive failure. Resting mature females (non-lactating or non-pregnant) had significantly higher mean ∑PCBs (18.5 mg/kg) than both lactating (7.5 mg/kg) and pregnant females (6 mg/kg), though not significantly different to sexually immature females (14.0 mg/kg). Using multinomial logistic regression models ΣPCBs was found to be a significant predictor of mature female reproductive status, adjusting for the effects of confounding variables. Resting females were more likely to have a higher PCB burden. Health status (proxied by "trauma" or "infectious disease" causes of death) was also a significant predictor, with lactating females (i.e. who successfully reproduced) more likely to be in good health status compared to other individuals. Based on contaminant profiles (>11 mg/kg lipid), at least 29/60 (48%) of resting females had not offloaded their pollutant burden via gestation and primarily lactation. Where data were available, these non-offloading females were previously gravid, which suggests foetal or newborn mortality. Furthermore, a lower pregnancy rate of 50% was estimated for "healthy" females that died of traumatic causes of death, compared to other populations. Whether or not PCBs are part of an underlying mechanism, we used individual PCB burdens to show further evidence of reproductive failure in the North-east Atlantic harbour porpoise population, results that should inform conservation management.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26200456 PMCID: PMC4511585 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131085
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Frequency distribution of age profiles for female reproductive status categories in UK stranded harbour porpoises (n = 250).
Mean age (yrs) and mean ΣPCBs (mg/kg) for the different reproductive status categories and cause of death groups.
| Sexually immature | Sexually mature | Resting | Pregnant | Lactating | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1.34 | 8.40 | 8.09 | 9.18 | 7.66 |
| 0–6 | 3–21 | 3–20 | 4–21 | 4–14 | |
| (n = 160) | (n = 90 | (n = 41) | (n = 28) | (n = 20) | |
| Infectious disease | 2 | 8.24 | 7.88 | 9.27 | 8.14 |
| 0–5 | 3–21 | 3–13 | 4–21 | 4–14 | |
| (n = 52) | (n = 47) | (n = 29) | (n = 11) | (n = 7) | |
| Trauma | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8.93 | 7.69 |
| 0–6 | 3–21 | 4–14 | 3–21 | 5–12 | |
| (n = 78) | (n = 36) | (n = 9) | (n = 15) | (n = 12) | |
| Other COD | 0.31 | 10 | 10.33 | 10.5 | 4 |
| 0–3 | 4–20 | 5–20 | 6–15 | 4 | |
| (n = 30) | (n = 7 | (n = 3) | (n = 2) | (n = 1) | |
|
| 14.03 | 13.26 | 18.53 | 6.0 | 7.49 |
| 0.48–159.68 | 0.4–138.83 | 0.95–138.83 | 0.74–24.76 | 0.4–33.13 | |
| (n = 190) | (n = 130 | (n = 60) | (n = 37) | (n = 30) | |
| Infectious disease | 17.64 | 15.94 | 20.32 | 6.71 | 9.41 |
| 1.63–86.99 | 0.95–138.83 | 0.95–138.83 | 1.03–21.9 | 1.42–21.4 | |
| (n = 62) | (n = 68 | (n = 43) | (n = 15) | (n = 9) | |
| Trauma | 9.47 | 6.96 | 8.5 | 5.83 | 7.43 |
| 0.48–44.15 | 0.74–33.13 | 1.92–15.37 | 2.34–24.76 | 1.29–33.13 | |
| (n = 92) | (n = 50) | (n = 12) | (n = 20) | (n = 18) | |
| Other COD | 19.49 | 24.37 | 28.02 | 2.33 | 2.03 |
| 1.81–159.68 | 0.40–138.75 | 4.09–78.29 | 1.52–3.13 | 0.4–5.0 | |
| (n = 36) | (n = 12) | (n = 5) | (n = 2) | (n = 3) |
1Includes one female that was not assigned to a mature reproductive status category.
2Includes three individuals that were not assigned to a mature reproductive status category.
3Includes two females that were not assigned to a mature reproductive status category.
Estimated pregnancy rates (PR: percentage pregnant) using all data, and separately for cause of death (COD) categories.
PR was also estimated using data that was obtained outside the conception period (May to September [63]; see methods).
| Mature | Pregnant | PR | |
|---|---|---|---|
| (n) | (n) | (%) | |
|
| 127 | 37 | 29 |
|
| 76 | 26 | 34 |
|
| 68 | 15 | 22 |
|
| 49 | 13 | 26.5 |
|
| 42 | 13 | 31 |
|
| 20 | 10 | 50 |
Fig 2Total number of corpora scars (corpora albicantia and corpora lutea) in UK stranded harbour porpoise ovaries as a function of age (n = 225).
Dashed box highlights three females that presented with higher than expected number of corpora scars.
Criteria for assessing categories of reproductive failure in UK harbour porpoises.
| Observed categories of reproductive failure | Criteria for determining categories of reproductive failure |
|---|---|
|
| Mature female died during a difficult or abnormal birth indicated by one or more of the following factors: (partially) dilated cervix; significant haemorrhage of the vagina; acute septic metritis; uterine rupture; rupturing and expulsion of the placental membranes prior to delivery of the calf; foetus was not correctly positioned; foetus was in breech presentation and it showed very marked autolytic change indicating that the calf may have died in utero and the mother had been trying to abort the body; corpus luteum showed evidence of regression on histological assessment. |
|
| Foetus was mummified or showing very marked autolytic change compared to its mother, both on gross and histological examination; and corpus luteum showed evidence of regression on histological assessment. |
|
| Mature female died outside the conception/calving period for the population and was recently gravid based on the state of the reproductive tract such as: cervix was (slightly) dilated; uteri not fully involuted/asymmetrical uterine horns; endometrium was hyperplastic/gross or histological evidence of lesions or remodeling in the uterine body; and the presence of a regressing corpus luteum. In some cases mammary glands showed only a minimum degree of lactation, or a complete lack of activity. |
|
| Mature female was recently gravid based on the state of the reproductive tract tissues and a regressing corpus luteum (as above). Mammary glands only showed a minimum degree of lactation, a lack of activity or showed evidence of “drying up” based on histological assessment. The mature female had a high PCB burden, and thus did not successfully offload her pollutant burden suggesting either abortion or early calf mortality. |
Fig 3ΣPCBs as a function of (a) corpora scar number (n = 266) and (b) age (n = 254).
Graphs exclude two neonates ranging between 86.9–159.7 mg/kg in ΣPCBs. Blue line represents the threshold level (9 mg/kg ΣPCBs mg/kg lipid) for adverse health effects.
Fig 4Accumulation of PCBs with age in male stranded UK harbour porpoises.
Fitted regression line and 95% CI values are shown, n = 257. Annual ΣPCB accumulation rate is 1.11 mg/kg.
Fig 5Box plots of (a) female reproductive status and ΣPCBs, and (b) cause of death groups and ΣPCBs.
The dark horizontal line indicates the median, and the dashed blue line the mean. Outliers are highlighted by blue circles.
Results from the multinomial logistic regression likelihood ratio tests including significant predictors.
| Predictors | Likelihood Ratio Tests | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model Fitting Criteria | Chi-Square | df | Sig. | |
|
| 208.484 | 32.848 | 2 | 0.000 |
|
| 184.569 | 8.933 | 2 | 0.011 |
|
| 183.572 | 7.936 | 2 | 0.019 |
|
| 183.581 | 7.945 | 2 | 0.019 |
Length-to-girth (LN:G) ratio (proxy for nutritional stress), cause of death (COD) class (infectious disease and trauma; proxy for health status), ΣPCBs (mg/kg), and season (season 1 = April to September, and season 2 = October to March).
Estimated pregnancy rates, based on the presence of a foetus and excluding the conception period, of mature female harbour porpoises.
| Country/Region | Sampling period | Pregnancy rate | n | ASM (yrs) | n | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1990–2012 | 0.34 | 76 | 4.73 | 250 | Current study |
|
| 1990–2012 | 0.50 | 20 | 4.92 | 112 | Current study |
|
| 1992–2005 | 0.34 | 29 | 4.35 | 144 | [ |
|
| 2001–2003 | 0.42 | 26 | [ | ||
|
| 1985–1991 | 0.73 | 33 | [ | ||
|
| 1988–1990 | 0.67 | 18 | [ | ||
|
| 1991–1997 | 0.98 | 74 | 3.2 | 269 | [ |
|
| 0.76 | [ | ||||
|
| 0.90 | 10 | [ | |||
|
| 1985–1988 | 0.74 | 35 | [ | ||
|
| 1989–1993 | 0.93 | 14 | 3.27 | 11 | [ |
|
| 1975–1989 | 0.72 | 18 | [ |
1Included porpoises from the Iberian Peninsula population, and all causes of death.
2Included porpoises from the Danish North Sea and Inner Danish waters.
3Average age of 50% mature.
4Mean age of first-time ovulators.
5Study did not exclude the mating period, and included two recently pregnant lactating females.