Literature DB >> 35222950

Estimating the abundance of the critically endangered Baltic Proper harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) population using passive acoustic monitoring.

Mats Amundin1, Julia Carlström2,3, Len Thomas4, Ida Carlén2,5, Jonas Teilmann6, Jakob Tougaard6, Olli Loisa7, Line A Kyhn6, Signe Sveegaard6, M Louise Burt4, Iwona Pawliczka8, Radomil Koza8, Bartlomiej Arciszewski8, Anders Galatius6, Jussi Laaksonlaita7, Jamie MacAuley9,10, Andrew J Wright6,11, Anja Gallus12, Michael Dähne12, Alejandro Acevedo-Gutiérrez13, Harald Benke12, Jens Koblitz12,14,15,16, Nick Tregenza17, Daniel Wennerberg1,18, Katharina Brundiers12, Monika Kosecka8,19, Cinthia Tiberi Ljungqvist1,20, Ivar Jussi21, Martin Jabbusch12, Sami Lyytinen7, Aleksej Šaškov22, Penina Blankett23.   

Abstract

Knowing the abundance of a population is a crucial component to assess its conservation status and develop effective conservation plans. For most cetaceans, abundance estimation is difficult given their cryptic and mobile nature, especially when the population is small and has a transnational distribution. In the Baltic Sea, the number of harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) has collapsed since the mid-20th century and the Baltic Proper harbour porpoise is listed as Critically Endangered by the IUCN and HELCOM; however, its abundance remains unknown. Here, one of the largest ever passive acoustic monitoring studies was carried out by eight Baltic Sea nations to estimate the abundance of the Baltic Proper harbour porpoise for the first time. By logging porpoise echolocation signals at 298 stations during May 2011-April 2013, calibrating the loggers' spatial detection performance at sea, and measuring the click rate of tagged individuals, we estimated an abundance of 71-1105 individuals (95% CI, point estimate 491) during May-October within the population's proposed management border. The small abundance estimate strongly supports that the Baltic Proper harbour porpoise is facing an extremely high risk of extinction, and highlights the need for immediate and efficient conservation actions through international cooperation. It also provides a starting point in monitoring the trend of the population abundance to evaluate the effectiveness of management measures and determine its interactions with the larger neighboring Belt Sea population. Further, we offer evidence that design-based passive acoustic monitoring can generate reliable estimates of the abundance of rare and cryptic animal populations across large spatial scales.
© 2022 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C‐POD; Phocoena phocoena; abundance estimation; detection function; passive acoustic monitoring

Year:  2022        PMID: 35222950      PMCID: PMC8858216          DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8554

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Evol        ISSN: 2045-7758            Impact factor:   2.912


  37 in total

1.  Investigating potential associations between chronic exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls and infectious disease mortality in harbour porpoises from England and Wales.

Authors:  P D Jepson; P M Bennett; C R Allchin; R J Law; T Kuiken; J R Baker; E Rogan; J K Kirkwood
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  From echolocation clicks to animal density--acoustic sampling of harbor porpoises with static dataloggers.

Authors:  Line A Kyhn; Jakob Tougaard; Len Thomas; Linda Rosager Duve; Joanna Stenback; Mats Amundin; Geneviève Desportes; Jonas Teilmann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Echolocation signals of wild harbour porpoises, Phocoena phocoena.

Authors:  Anne Villadsgaard; Magnus Wahlberg; Jakob Tougaard
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 4.  Unoccupied Aircraft Systems in Marine Science and Conservation.

Authors:  David W Johnston
Journal:  Ann Rev Mar Sci       Date:  2018-07-18

5.  Ultra-High Foraging Rates of Harbor Porpoises Make Them Vulnerable to Anthropogenic Disturbance.

Authors:  Danuta Maria Wisniewska; Mark Johnson; Jonas Teilmann; Laia Rojano-Doñate; Jeanne Shearer; Signe Sveegaard; Lee A Miller; Ursula Siebert; Peter Teglberg Madsen
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Temporary hearing threshold shift in a harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) after exposure to multiple airgun sounds.

Authors:  Ronald A Kastelein; Lean Helder-Hoek; Shirley Van de Voorde; Alexander M von Benda-Beckmann; Frans-Peter A Lam; Erwin Jansen; Christ A F de Jong; Michael A Ainslie
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Persistent chlorinated organic contaminants in harbour porpoises from the North Sea, the Baltic Sea and Arctic waters.

Authors:  R Bruhn; N Kannan; G Petrick; D E Schulz-Bull; J C Duinker
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  1999-09-30       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  Cytokine expression and lymphocyte proliferative capacity in diseased harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) - Biomarkers for health assessment in wildlife cetaceans.

Authors:  Kristina Lehnert; Ursula Siebert; Kristina Reißmann; Regina Bruhn; Michael S McLachlan; Gundi Müller; Cornelis E van Elk; Malgorzata Ciurkiewicz; Wolfgang Baumgärtner; Andreas Beineke
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 8.071

9.  Temporary shift in masked hearing thresholds in a harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) after exposure to seismic airgun stimuli.

Authors:  Klaus Lucke; Ursula Siebert; Paul A Lepper; Marie-Anne Blanchet
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Clicking in a killer whale habitat: narrow-band, high-frequency biosonar clicks of harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) and Dall's porpoise (Phocoenoides dalli).

Authors:  Line A Kyhn; Jakob Tougaard; Kristian Beedholm; Frants H Jensen; Erin Ashe; Rob Williams; Peter T Madsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.