N B R Colombo1, M P Rangel1, V Martins1, M Hage2, D P Gelain3, D F Barbeiro4, C K Grisolia5, E R Parra1, V L Capelozzi1. 1. Departamento de Patologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, BR. 2. Laboratório de Poluição Atmosférica, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, BR. 3. Departamento de Stress Oxidativo, Universidade do Rio Grande do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, RS, BR. 4. Departamento de Emergência Clínica, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, BR. 5. Departamento de Genética e Morfologia, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, DF, BR.
Abstract
The antioxidant effects of Caryocar brasiliense Camb, commonly known as the pequi fruit, have not been evaluated to determine their protective effects against oxidative damage in lung carcinogenesis. In the present study, we evaluated the role of pequi fruit against urethane-induced DNA damage and oxidative stress in forty 8-12 week old male BALB/C mice. An in vivo comet assay was performed to assess DNA damage in lung tissues and changes in lipid peroxidation and redox cycle antioxidants were monitored for oxidative stress. Prior supplementation with pequi oil or its extract (15 µL, 60 days) significantly reduced urethane-induced oxidative stress. A protective effect against DNA damage was associated with the modulation of lipid peroxidation and low protein and gene expression of nitric oxide synthase. These findings suggest that the intake of pequi fruit might protect against in vivo genotoxicity and oxidative stress.
The antioxidant effects of Caryocar brasiliense Camb, commonly known as the pequi fruit, have not been evaluated to determine their protective effects against oxidative damage in lung carcinogenesis. In the present study, we evaluated the role of pequi fruit against urethane-induced DNA damage and oxidative stress in forty 8-12 week old male BALB/C mice. An in vivo comet assay was performed to assess DNA damage in lung tissues and changes in lipid peroxidation and redox cycle antioxidants were monitored for oxidative stress. Prior supplementation with pequi oil or its extract (15 µL, 60 days) significantly reduced urethane-induced oxidative stress. A protective effect against DNA damage was associated with the modulation of lipid peroxidation and low protein and gene expression of nitric oxide synthase. These findings suggest that the intake of pequi fruit might protect against in vivo genotoxicity and oxidative stress.
Lung cancer (LC) and other types of cancer are a major cause of death, and LC represents
28% of total deaths by cancer worldwide (1). The
prevalence of LC has increased, whereas the mortality rate for neoplastic diseases has
decreased in developed countries, in the last 20 years (1). Treatments include surgery, radiotherapy, and/or chemotherapy. However,
chemotherapy has a number of limitations including side effects, toxicity, and drug
resistance. Additionally, most established chemotherapy drugs lack specificity for tumor
cells (2). Therefore, there has been a growing
interest in the use of fruits as a promising source of more efficient new therapeutic
anticancer drugs. Recent trends in cancer treatment also include increasing awareness
and chemoprevention. These attitudes have opened the way to using natural or synthetic
compounds to prevent the initiation and promotion of events associated with cancer
development (1,3,4).Epidemiological studies have highlighted an important relationship between increased
consumption of antioxidant fruits and a lower risk of chronic diseases such as cancer
(5). Therefore, the increased consumption of
antioxidant fruits is considered a beneficial routine practice to decrease cancer
incidence (3,4,). In this context, the antioxidant properties of fruits of the
Caryocaraceae family have been previously investigated (
10-13). However, Caryocar brasiliense
Camb, commonly known as pequi, a native fruit from the Brazilian savannah
(
10-13) with antioxidant properties has not been
assessed as a protective agent against oxidative damage in urethane-induced lung
carcinogenesis.Urethane metabolites cause oxidative stress in DNA molecules, causing the development of
adducts and C-hydroxylation to form vinyl carbamate, which is then converted to an
epoxide that interacts with nucleic acid (14).
The resulting reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) play an
important role in the initiation, promotion, and progression phases of the disease
(15,16). The endogenous antioxidant enzyme defense and adequate ingestion of
antioxidants from exogenous sources prevent the oxidative damage caused by ROS and RNS,
including DNA damage and lipid peroxidation (15).In the present study, we evaluated in vivo DNA damage through
biochemical, immunohistochemical, and molecular biology assays to assess the modulatory
effects of pequi on the oxidative stress in urethane carcinogenesis.
Material and Methods
Plant material and chemicals
In the present study, plant material used as pequi oil and pequi ethanolic extract
were provided by the laboratory of Departamento de Genética e Morfologia,
Universidade de Brasilia, Brazil (PI0601631-6). The procedures used to obtain the
pulp involved peeling or grating the internal mesocarp, which was stoked in a
protected vessel and frozen at -86°C. Extraction of the pequi pulp was obtained by
cold maceration using chloroform as a solvent. The extract was submitted to
low-pressure evaporation and dried under high vacuum to remove the solvent
completely. All the compounds were stored in dark flasks, labeled, and sealed to
prevent oxidation until use. The relative composition of the pequi fruit pulp oil was
previously determined by Miranda-Vilela et al. (12,13).Xylazine, ketamine, and urethane were provided by the hospital pharmacy of the
teaching hospital, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil.
Beta-carotene (ß-caroteneC9750) was obtained from Sigma Aldrich (USA). The cornoil
used to dilute the beta-carotene was obtained from a local pharmacy.
Urethane tumor induction
All procedures described in the project were approved by the local Ethics Committee
for Animal Research (Internal Ethics Committee of the facilities, Faculdade de
Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, #020/11). Lung cancer was induced in mice with
urethane (2× intra-peritoneal [ip] injections; 1.5
g·kg-1·dose-1), a chemical carcinogen (17). The use of urethane to induce this type of cancer is a
simple and commonly used experimental model of lung cancer (
18-20).
Animals and treatments
Male mice (BALB/C, n=40, 8-12 weeks old) were obtained from the animal facility of
the Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo. The animals were housed in
plastic cages (6 per cage) at room temperature and were provided free access to food
and water. On the same day as the second administration of urethane, the animals were
divided into 5 groups and started to receive antioxidant supplementation. The control
group (C, n=5) did not receive gavage or urethane doses. All other groups received
two doses of urethane and specific gavage treatment as follows. The urethane-injected
group (U, n=5) received 2 doses of urethane and did not receive gavage. The pequi
ethanolic extract group (UE, n=10) received urethane (2 doses) and daily gavage with
ethanolic extract (15 µL) of pequi. The pequi oil group (UO, n=10) received urethane
(2 doses) and 30 mg·animal-1·day-1 of pequi oil administered
orally as 15 µL by gavage. The beta-carotene group (UB, n=10), received urethane (2
doses) and daily gavage with beta-carotene (3 µg/kg, diluted in cornoil). After
treatment (60 days), the animals received an ip dose of a lethal
mixture of ketamine and xylazine. The lungs were then removed en
bloc. To avoid regional differences in lung specimens, we randomized
tissue samples including most of the lung lobes for the different assays.The optimal doses of pequi oil and pequi extract used in this study were established
by conducting two pilot studies as well as previously published data (
11-13). The dose of beta-carotene administered
was calculated by transforming the equation developed by Reagan-Shaw et al. (20), and using a dose close to that of the
nutritional recommendations by the Brazilian Agency for Sanitary Surveillance for
provitamin Acarotenoids.
Determination of antioxidant enzyme activity in lung tissue
Lung tissue catalase (CAT) activity was assessed by measuring the rate of decrease in
H2O2 absorbance using a spectrophotometer (240 nm). The
results are reported as CAT units/mg protein. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity was
assayed by quantifying the inhibition of superoxide-dependent adrenaline
auto-oxidation using a spectrophotometer (480 nm) and the results were reported as
SOD units/mg protein. The ratio between SOD and CAT activities (SOD/CAT) was
calculated to analyze the effect of treatments with pequi oil and ethanolic extract.
Lung tissue glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activity was determined by measuring the
rate of NADPH oxidation using a spectrophotometer (340 nm). The activity of GPx was
reported as International Units (nmol NADPH oxidized·min-1·mg
protein-1.
Comet assay
Fresh lung tissue was macerated and homogenized. Cells embedded in agarose on a
microscope slide were lysed with detergent and high salt to form nucleoids containing
supercoiled loops of DNA linked to the nuclear matrix. Electrophoresis at pH 7
resulting in structures resembling comets was performed as previously described
(21,22). Damaged cells were identified by the presence of a tail similar to
that of a comet, formed by DNA fragments. The fragments were present in different
sizes and were associated with the damage score.
To evaluate lipid peroxidation, the formation of TBARS was measured during an
acid-heating reaction, which is commonly used for the measurement of the lipid redox
state. The samples were mixed with trichloroacetic acid (10%, 0.6 mL) and
thiobarbituric acid (0.67%, 0.5 mL), and then incubated at 100°C for 25 min. TBARS
were determined by their absorbance measured using a spectrophotometer (532 nm). The
results are reported as nmol TBARS/mg protein.
Immunohistochemistry
Immunohistochemistry to detect the expression of the NOS1, NOS2, and NOS3 isoforms
(Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., USA; dil. 1:100) was performed using a standard
peroxidase technique. Samples were diluted in a bovineserum albumin (BSA; 0.5%,
Sigma Diagnostics, USA) solution. The antigen expression was determined using
Novolink Max Polymer (Leica Biosystems Newcastle Ltd., UK), pressure-cooking antigen
retrieval, diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride, and counterstaining with hematoxylin.
Brownish cytoplasmic staining in the alveolar and bronchiolar cells was considered
evidence of antigen expression.Expression of NOS1, NOS2, and NOS3 was assessed in 10 fields using a point-counting
technique with a 100-point grid of a known area (62,500 mm2; 400×
magnification) attached to the microscope ocular (23). The area of each field was calculated according to the number of
points containing positive cells for NOS1, 2, and 3, proportional to the total grid
area (400× magnification). The fractional area of positive cells was determined as
the number of positive cells in each field divided by the connective tissue area. The
final results are reported as percentages.Interobserver comparisons were performed in 20% of the slides by two observers (VLC
and ERP). The coefficient of variation for interobserver error regarding cell count
was <5%.
Molecular biology
Total RNA was extracted using the Trizol method as described previously (24). Complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized
using total RNA (4 µg) and the SuperScript First-Strand Synthesis System for RT-PCR
Kit (Invitrogen life Technology, UK). Quantitative RT-PCR was performed using the
TaqMan assay according to the manufacturer's instructions for gene expression
quantification of NOS1, NOS2, and NOS3. Reactions were performed on the StepOnePlus
(Applied Biosystems, USA) system. Data were analyzed by StepOne (v. 2.0; Applied
Biosystems) software. Results displaying a CT intra-variation <1.5 were further
used to calculate mean values. Data are reported as CT values (the cycle number at
which logarithmic PCR plots cross a calculated threshold line). The relative
expression of genes of interest was normalized to that of GAPDH and gene expression
in each sample was then compared with the expression in pool cells. The comparative
CT method was used to quantify gene expression and the relative expression was
calculated as 2 CT.
Statistical analysis
All data were analyzed using statistical tests for differences, based on the
distribution types of variables. Parametric distributions were performed using the
SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences; v. 18.0; SPSS Inc., USA) statistical
software. Values of each continuous variable are reported as means±SD. The Student's
t-test was used to compare the means of two groups of samples.
Mean comparison of three or more groups of samples was performed by the
t-test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by
appropriate post hoc tests, including the Bonferroni test for
multiple comparisons. P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Results
Lung tissue specimens from control animals were analyzed at a low magnification and
showed uniform histoarchitecture of the lung parenchyma (Figure 1A) and thin alveolar walls (Figure 1B). In contrast, lung specimens from urethane-injected
mice were modified by the presence of small subpleural nodules in the parenchyma
(Figure 1C and D) including slightly
atypical round or oval epithelial cells, containing hyperchromatic nuclei and
eosinophilic cytoplasm arranged in small acini. The atypical mitosis count was in the
range of 3-5 per 10 high-power fields.
Figure 1
Histopathology of lung tissue. A and B,
Preserved alveolar acini with delicate alveolar walls (arrows) in control mice
(H&E). C and D, Lung tissue of
urethane-injected mice showing atypical epithelial nodules (asterisk) with
subpleural localization composed of round or oval cells (arrowheads) containing
abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm and hyperchromatic nuclei, but without evident
nucleoli, forming characteristic glands or acini (H&E).
Catalase, superoxide dismutase, and glutathione peroxidase levels were analyzed in
lung tissue specimens from control and urethane-injected mice. The SOD/CAT ratio was
also determined. In lung tissue specimens from urethane-injected mice, although
showing a borderline significance (P=0.05), we observed a higher catalase activity
than in control mice (Figure 2A). In contrast,
SOD and glutathione peroxidase activities were similar in both groups. Similar
antioxidant enzyme activity was observed in lung tissue from supplemented and
urethane-injected mice (Figure 2B-D).
Figure 2
Quantification of activity of antioxidant enzymes in lung tissue specimens.
A, Urethane-injected mice (U) had higher catalase (CAT)
(*P=0.003) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) (P=0.07) activities compared to
controls (C). B-E, There were no significant
differences between the activities of CAT (B), SOD
(C), SOD/CAT ratio (D), and glutathione
peroxidase (CPx) (E). UO: urethane + pequi oil; UE: urethane +
pequi ethanolic extract; UB: urethane + beta-carotene. ANOVA was used for
statistical analysis.
Figure 3 shows lipidic peroxidation in lung
specimens of urethane-injected and supplemented mice. In lung specimens of
urethane-injected mice, oxidative damage to polyunsaturated fatty acids of cell
membranes was higher than in those of control mice (Figure 3A). In lung specimens of animals supplemented with pequi oil and
extract and beta-carotene, the levels of lipid peroxidation were lower than in those
of urethane-injected mice (Figure 3B).
Figure 3
Lipid peroxidation in lung specimens of mice. A, In
urethane-injected mice (U), lipid peroxidation was higher than in control mice
(C) (P=0.05). B, In animals that received daily doses of
antioxidants, the degree of lipid oxidation was lower than that observed in
urethane-injected mice (P<0.05). Data are reported as means±SD for
urethane-injected and control mice (n=5) and urethane-injected and supplemented
mice (n=10). U+O: urethane + pequi oil; U+E: urethane + pequi ethanolic
extract; U+B: urethane + beta-carotene. *P<0.05, ANOVA and
t-test.
Distribution of comet tail/head ratio in urethane-injected and urethane-supplemented
groups is shown in Table 1. In lung tissue
specimens, oxidative damage to DNA was observed in the urethane-injected mice and was
stratified according to the groups (Figure 4).
Lung tissue from urethane-injected mice showed a higher degree of DNA damage (Figure 4A), which was compatible with the
increased comet tail/head ratio, when compared with control mice. Interestingly,
lungs from animals that received the antioxidant supplementation showed a lower
degree of DNA damage (Figure 4B).
Figure 4
Oxidative damage to DNA in lung tissue specimens. A, Lung
tissues from urethane-injected mice (U) showed higher DNA damage when compared
to control mice (*P<0.0001, t-test). The degree of DNA
damage is illustrated in lung cells of control mice and urethane-injected mice
(arrows). B, The ratios of tail/head as measured in the comet
assay of supplemented mice (U+O: pequi oil group; U+E: pequi ethanolic extract
group; U+B: beta-carotene group) show reduced DNA damage compared to
urethane-injected mice (*P<0.0001, ANOVA; arrows). Data are reported as
means±SD in urethane-injected and control mice (n=5) and urethane-injected and
supplemented mice (n=10). Black arrows show the head and white arrows show the
tail.
Different immunostaining intensities were observed in the alveolar cells of lung
tissue from urethane-injected and supplemented mice (Figure 5), and were confirmed by histomorphometric analysis (Figure 6).
Figure 5
Immunostaining for NOS1, 2, and 3. Representative NOS-stained sections of
lung tissue specimens from control, urethane-injected, and supplemented mice
are shown. A-C, Few alveolar epithelial cells
(arrows) in control mice express NOS1, 2, or 3.
D-F, Numerous alveolar epithelial cells
(arrows) in urethane-injected mice express NOS1, 2, or 3.
G-O, Alveolar epithelial cells (arrows) in
antioxidant-supplemented mice with reduced expression of NOS1, 2, and
3.
Figure 6
Quantification of NOS immunoexpression in lung tissue specimens.
A, NOS in urethane-injected (U) and control mice (C),
*P<0.0001. B, NOS1 in urethane-injected and supplemented
mice: *pequi oil group (UO), pequi ethanolic extract group (UE), and
beta-carotene group (UB) vs urethane-injected group (U)
(P<0.001), and #UB vs UE and UO (P<0.05).
C, NOS2 urethane-injected and supplemented mice: *U
vs UO, UE, and UB (P<0.0001), and #UB
vs UO and UE (P<0.05). D, NOS3 in
urethane-injected and supplemented mice: *U vs UO, UB, and UE (P<0.001),
#UB vs UO and UE (P<0.001), and
δUE vs UO (P<0.001). Data are reported as
means±SD in urethane-injected and control mice (n=5) and urethane-injected and
supplemented mice (n=10). Groups were compared using ANOVA and the
t-test.
The immunoexpression of NOS1, 2, and 3 in lung alveolar cells of urethane-injected
mice was higher than that observed in control animals (Figure 6A). In contrast, lungs from mice that received antioxidant
supplementation exhibited a decreased immunoexpression of NOS1, 2, and 3 when
compared to the urethane-injected group (Figure 6B, C,
and D). Interestingly, an inverse order was observed for NOS expression in
mice supplemented with beta-carotene. The lung expression of NOS1 (Figure 6B) and NOS3 (Figure 6D) was lower and that of NOS2 (Figure 6C) was higher than in mice supplemented with pequi oil
and pequi extract. In addition, NOS3 expression in mice supplemented with pequi oil
was lower than in mice supplemented with pequi extract (Figure 6D).
Gene expression of nitric oxide synthases
The gene expression of NOS for different groups was analyzed (Figure 7). In lung tissue specimens from
urethane-injected mice, the gene expression of NOS3 was higher than
in the controls. Figure 7B shows that the
supplementation of urethane-injected mice with pequi oil or extract did not modify
the gene expression of NOS1 in lung tissues. The gene expression of
NOS2 in lung tissues from supplemented mice was lower than in
urethane-injected mice (Figure 7C). In mice
supplemented with pequi oil and beta-carotene, NOS3 gene expression
was lower than in urethane-injected mice (Figure
7D).
Figure 7
Gene expression of nitric oxide synthases. A, Expression
of NOS1, 2, 3 in urethane-injected mice (U) was significantly higher than in
control mice (C) (*P<0.05). B, There was no significant
difference in the gene expression of NOS1 in the study groups.
C, Expression of NOS2 in urethane-injected mice was higher
than in antioxidant supplemented mice, *P<0.05, pequi oil group (UO), pequi
ethanolic extract group (UE), and beta-carotene group (UB) vs
urethane-injected group (U). D, Expression of NOS3 in mice
supplemented with pequi oil and beta-carotene was lower than in
urethane-injected mice, *P<0.05, U vs UO and UB. Data are
reported as means±SD in urethane-injected and control mice (n=5) and
urethane-injected and supplemented mice (n=10). Groups were compared using the
ANOVA and the t-test.
Discussion
In this study, we analyzed the modulatory effects of pequi fruit on oxidative stress
induced by urethane carcinogenesis by measuring in vivo DNA damage
through biochemical, immunohistochemical, and molecular biology assays. Beta-carotene
was used as a positive control. We showed that the popular pequi fruit has anti-DNA
damage and antioxidant properties. Specifically, we showed a significant protective
effect of pequi fruit oil and pequi extract against DNA and oxidative damage induced by
urethane in the lung. Our findings using biochemical and molecular biology assays
indicated that the antioxidant activity of Caryocar brasiliense Camb
might be useful as an antioxidant to reduce the effects of genotoxic carcinogens.After 60 days of treatment, urethane-injected mice developed small subpleural tumors in
the lung parenchyma. Urethanetumors are a neoplasm of epithelial malignant origin
corresponding to the humanadenocarcinoma (25).
Urethanecancer is a rapid model of lung carcinogenesis because nodules are formed
within 2 months (18). The process of urethanecarcinogenesis involves enzyme metabolization into vinyl carbamate and N-hydroxylamine
epoxides, which generate oxidative stress in the lung cell environment by generating ROS
and NOS (15), which cause oxidation and DNA
damage (16). In the nitrogen cycle, nitrogen
oxide is critical in converting nitrate (NO3
-) and nitrite (NO2
-) to ammonia (NH4
+), an essential component of protein synthesis, as well as in forming
vascular tone and cell signaling regulation. However, nitrogen oxide is also associated
with the generation of carcinogenicnitrosamines (26). In this circumstance, NO might contribute to the induction of genotoxic
lesions as well as the promotion of angiogenesis, tumor cell growth, and invasion (27). In mammals, NO is synthesized by three
differently gene-encoded NOS: neuronal NOS (nNOS or NOS1), inducible NOS (iNOS or NOS2),
and endothelial NOS (eNOS or NOS3). The three isoforms share similar structures and
catalytic characteristics, although the mechanisms that control their activity in time
and space are different (28). The expression of
NOS2 is induced by an inflammatory signal, whereas NOS1 and NOS3 are constitutively
expressed (29).Our results confirm the reports cited above. Indeed, these three NOS isoforms were
highly expressed in alveolar cells in the lung tissue of urethane-injected mice.
Moreover, a high gene expression of NOS2 and NOS3 was
found in lung tissue specimens from urethane-injected mice. Nevertheless, lungs from
animals supplemented with pequi had a decreased expression of these isoforms, and
NOS3 was diminished further after supplementation with pequi oil
when compared with pequi extract. These findings are in accordance with the lower gene
expression of NOS2 and NOS3 in lung tissues from mice
supplemented with pequi oil and beta-carotene, without modification of
NOS1 gene expression. Therefore, these findings might be related to
the carotenoid component found in the pequi oil and extract (30), and also to its antioxidant activity reinforced by the presence
of the DPPH (2,2'-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) free radical (31). However, although the carotenoid content might be partly
responsible for the protective effect of pequi oil as observed in our study, other
components of pequi oil such as oleic, palmitic, stearic, and polyunsaturated fatty
acids might also have some effects. The antineoplastic effect of oleic acid was
previously described (32), and palmitic, stearic
(saturated), and linolenic (polyunsaturated) fatty acids are related to prostate cancer
(33) and dietary polyunsaturated fatty acids
with breast and colorectum tumors (34).Interestingly, we found an inverse association between NOS protein expression and mice
supplemented with beta-carotene. In these mice, the lung expression of the NOS1 and NOS3
isoforms was lower and NOS2 expression was higher than in mice supplemented with pequioil or pequi extract. A pro-oxidant effect, characterized by an increased incidence of
lung cancer, was described in smokers taking high (pharmacological) daily doses of
beta-carotene for 6 months (35). It was also
suggested that pro-oxidant compounds increase the production of free radical species,
neutralizing antioxidant defenses and causing damage to cell membranes, proteins, and
DNA (36). Taken together, these findings support
the concept that antioxidant supplementation exerts different actions on the different
NOS isoform proteins. For example, the administration of beta-carotene increased the
expression of the NOS2 isoform, which could be detrimental in a model of tumor-bearing
mice. Supplementation with the pequi extract and pequi oil reduced the expression of the
three NOS isoform proteins, but only reduced the gene expression of the
NOS2 and NOS3 isoforms. The gene expression of
NOS1 was unchanged with supplementation.We also found that the oxidative damage to polyunsaturated fatty acids in the cell
membranes of lung tissue from urethane-injected mice was higher than in control mice.
This finding is in agreement with the evidence that excess free radicals generated by
urethane causes oxidative damage to the cellular components of lung parenchyma,
including DNA. This damage leads to the constitutive activation of signaling pathways,
promoting and initiating a cascade of lipid peroxidation and protein oxidation that
elicits inflammation-driven carcinogenesis (37).
Our study used the comet and oxidative stress assays to investigate the cytotoxic,
genotoxic, and oxidative effects of urethane involved in carcinogenesis-bearing mice.
Significant cytotoxic and genotoxic effects were observed after urethane injection,
which induced a significant reduction in cell viability with clear direct DNA damage
mediated by oxidative stress. Such effects were inhibited after the supplementation of
mice with pequi and beta-carotene. Therefore, DNA damage can be avoided through
antioxidant status modulation by administering pequi oil or pequi extract, resulting in
protection against the genotoxic effects of urethane.A high activity of catalase, superoxide dismutase, and glutathione peroxidase was
maintained in the lung tissue of urethane-injected mice after supplementation with pequioil or pequi extract, and might be explained as an initial response to the oxidative
damage, because the cellular oxidative status regulates the activity of these enzymes
(38). We also concluded this was a
compensatory mechanism to prevent oxidative damage. Nevertheless, this result may also
be interpreted as the insufficient inhibition or decrease of oxidative stress caused by
urethane, suggesting that increased ROS production and reduced ROS detoxification are
involved with tumor growth and metastasis as previously reported (39). Our results indicated that continuously administered pequi oil
enhanced the activity of antioxidant enzymes such as glutathione reductase, glutathione
S-transferase, catalase, and superoxide dismutase in urethane primed cancerous lung
tissues of mice (40).To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to investigate the effects
of pequi fruit pulp oil (a carotenoid-rich oil) and extract on experimental lung cancer,
the expression of antioxidant enzymes, protein and gene expression, as well as DNA
conformational changes in cancerous cells. However, our study limitations included the
comparison of results. Other studies on the effects of pequi fruit on tumorigenesis
conducted by the Miranda-Vilela group (12,13) used Ehrlich tumor-bearing mice to investigate
hematological, toxicological, and histopathological changes.Based on the results and observations, our study indicated that pequi oil and pequi
extract modified urethanelung cancer in BALB/C mice due to its antioxidant properties,
and restored urethane-mediated conformational changes of DNA to normal. We postulated
that pequi may improve the antioxidant defense system, by increasing the activities and
expression of antioxidant enzymes at the protein and genomic level, thus reducing
oxidative stress, consequently inhibiting the overexpression of transcription factors.
Our results also suggested that pequi may modify the carcinogenic process either by
blocking the development of early lesions or by inhibiting the progression to invasive
cancer. Further investigation is required to elucidate the role of each active
constituent of pequi to determine the molecular mechanism involved and to develop
targeted therapy for lung and other cancers.
Authors: Francesca L Crowe; Naomi E Allen; Paul N Appleby; Kim Overvad; Inge V Aardestrup; Nina F Johnsen; Anne Tjønneland; Jakob Linseisen; Rudolf Kaaks; Heiner Boeing; Janine Kröger; Antonia Trichopoulou; Assimina Zavitsanou; Dimitrios Trichopoulos; Carlotta Sacerdote; Domenico Palli; Rosario Tumino; Claudia Agnoli; Lambertus A Kiemeney; H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; María-Dolores Chirlaque; Eva Ardanaz; Nerea Larrañaga; José R Quirós; Maria-José Sánchez; Carlos A González; Pär Stattin; Göran Hallmans; Sheila Bingham; Kay-Tee Khaw; Sabina Rinaldi; Nadia Slimani; Mazda Jenab; Elio Riboli; Timothy J Key Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 7.045