| Literature DB >> 26197924 |
Jiqing Wang1, Huitong Zhou2, Qian Fang3, Xiu Liu1, Yuzhu Luo1, Jon G H Hickford3.
Abstract
WFIKKN2 may play a role in the regulation of muscle growth and development, but to date there have been no reports on the effect of variation in WFIKKN2 on growth and carcass traits in livestock. In this study, the effect of variation in ovine WFIKKN2 was investigated in 800 New Zealand Romney lambs (395 male and 405 female), with five previously described variants (A to E) being identified. Variation in ovine WFIKKN2 was not found to affect various growth traits in the female lambs, but the presence of variant B was associated (P < 0.05) with decreased birth weight, tailing weight, weaning weight and pre-weaning growth rate; and increased post-weaning growth rate in male lambs. In male lambs, the presence of variant B was associated (P < 0.05) with an increased shoulder yield and proportion shoulder yield. No associations with growth or carcass traits were detected for the presence (or absence) of the other variants. These results suggest that variation in ovine WFIKKN2 may have a differential effect on growth in male and female lambs, and hence that the gene may be expressed in, or act in, a gender-specific fashion.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26197924 PMCID: PMC4510519 DOI: 10.1038/srep12347
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Frequency of ovine WFIKKN2 variants in NZ Romney lambs.
| Gender | Frequency (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 395 | 38.73 | 47.59 | 11.52 | 1.39 | 0.77 | 0.984 |
| Female | 405 | 38.64 | 47.65 | 11.36 | 1.60 | 0.75 | |
1P value was derived form a chi-square test for frequency differences when comparing male and female lambs.
Ovine WFIKKN2 genotype frequencies in male and female lambs and their deviation from expected values1.
| Genotype | Male lambs | Female lambs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual (%) | Expected | Actual (%) | Expected | |
| 9.11 | 15.00 | 15.56 | 14.93 | |
| 50.13 | 36.86 | 36.54 | 36.82 | |
| 15.70 | 22.65 | 23.21 | 22.71 | |
| 8.10 | 8.92 | 7.90 | 8.78 | |
| 10.89 | 10.96 | 10.62 | 10.83 | |
| 1.77 | 1.33 | 1.48 | 1.29 | |
| 0.002 | 0.994 | |||
1Genotypes containing the two rare variants (D and E) are not shown.
2Expected value for the specific genotype was calculated using POPGENE version 3.2.
3P value was derived from a chi-square test for genotype frequency difference (i.e. between the expected and actual values).
Association of ovine WFIKKN2 variants with growth traits (mean ± SE)1 in male and female NZ Romney lambs.
| Growth trait | Variant | Male lambs | Female lambs | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variant absent | Variant present | Variant absent | Variant present | ||||||||
| Birth weight (kg) | 5.3 ± 0.10 | 119 | 5.4 ± 0.07 | 262 | 0.504 | 5.1 ± 0.09 | 145 | 5.0 ± 0.07 | 245 | 0.603 | |
| 5.6 ± 0.12 | 75 | 5.3 ± 0.07 | 306 | 5.0 ± 0.10 | 105 | 5.1 ± 0.07 | 285 | 0.788 | |||
| 5.4 ± 0.07 | 300 | 5.4 ± 0.13 | 81 | 0.956 | 5.1 ± 0.07 | 310 | 5.0 ± 0.11 | 80 | 0.664 | ||
| Tailing weight (kg) | 18.4 ± 0.37 | 119 | 18.6 ± 0.27 | 262 | 0.684 | 17.6 ± 0.31 | 145 | 17.2 ± 0.25 | 245 | 0.301 | |
| 19.5 ± 0.46 | 75 | 18.3 ± 0.25 | 306 | 17.3 ± 0.35 | 105 | 17.4 ± 0.24 | 285 | 0.838 | |||
| 18.7 ± 0.26 | 300 | 18.1 ± 0.49 | 81 | 0.337 | 17.3 ± 0.24 | 310 | 17.5 ± 0.39 | 80 | 0.716 | ||
| Weaning weight (kg) | 32.3 ± 0.52 | 119 | 32.6 ± 0.38 | 262 | 0.593 | 29.8 ± 0.43 | 145 | 29.6 ± 0.34 | 245 | 0.730 | |
| 33.9 ± 0.64 | 75 | 32.2 ± 0.35 | 306 | 29.9 ± 0.47 | 105 | 29.6 ± 0.33 | 285 | 0.477 | |||
| 32.5 ± 0.37 | 300 | 32.6 ± 0.69 | 81 | 0.974 | 29.7 ± 0.33 | 310 | 29.7 ± 0.53 | 80 | 0.950 | ||
| Pre-weaning growth rate (g/d) | 300 ± 5 | 119 | 301 ± 4 | 262 | 0.814 | 265 ± 4 | 145 | 268 ± 3 | 245 | 0.462 | |
| 313 ± 6 | 75 | 298 ± 3 | 306 | 269 ± 4 | 105 | 266 ± 3 | 285 | 0.500 | |||
| 300 ± 4 | 300 | 303 ± 7 | 81 | 0.762 | 268 ± 3 | 310 | 264 ± 5 | 80 | 0.445 | ||
| Draft weight (kg) | 40.7 ± 0.38 | 119 | 40.7 ± 0.28 | 262 | 0.869 | ||||||
| 40.7 ± 0.47 | 75 | 40.7 ± 0.26 | 306 | 0.952 | |||||||
| 40.6 ± 0.27 | 300 | 40.8 ± 0.50 | 81 | 0.805 | |||||||
| Post-weaning growth rate (g/d) | 236 ± 13 | 119 | 227 ± 10 | 262 | 0.580 | ||||||
| 191 ± 16 | 75 | 239 ± 9 | 306 | ||||||||
| 229 ± 9 | 300 | 234 ± 17 | 81 | 0.817 | |||||||
| Growth rate from birth to draft (g/d) | 283 ± 3 | 119 | 281 ± 2 | 262 | 0.548 | ||||||
| 280 ± 4 | 75 | 282 ± 2 | 306 | 0.499 | |||||||
| 276 ± 7 | 300 | 280 ± 8 | 82 | 0.456 | |||||||
1Estimated means and standard errors from Linear Mixed-Models including “birth rank” as a fixed factor and “sire” as a random factor (P < 0.05 in bold).
2The draft weight, post-weaning growth rate and thus growth rate from birth to draft were only available for male lambs.
Association of ovine WFIKKN2variants with carcass muscle traits (mean ± SE)1 in male NZ Romney lambs.
| Carcass muscle trait | Variant being assessed | Other variants factored into in model | Variant absent | Variant present | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H-W (kg) | None | 17.0 ± 0.23 | 119 | 16.9 ± 0.19 | 266 | 0.462 | |
| None | 16.6 ± 0.27 | 75 | 17.0 ± 0.18 | 310 | 0.189 | ||
| None | 16.9 ± 0.18 | 303 | 16.8 ± 0.29 | 82 | 0.591 | ||
| Leg yield (%) | None | 21.6 ± 0.15 | 119 | 21.5 ± 0.12 | 266 | 0.639 | |
| None | 21.6 ± 0.18 | 75 | 21.6 ± 0.12 | 310 | 0.989 | ||
| None | 21.6 ± 0.12 | 303 | 21.6 ± 0.19 | 82 | 0.878 | ||
| Loin yield (%) | None | 14.7 ± 0.11 | 119 | 14.5 ± 0.09 | 266 | 0.274 | |
| None | 14.5 ± 0.13 | 75 | 14.6 ± 0.09 | 310 | 0.525 | ||
| None | 14.6 ± 0.09 | 303 | 14.6 ± 0.14 | 82 | 0.860 | ||
| Shoulder yield (%) | None | 17.0 ± 0.11 | 119 | 17.0 ± 0.09 | 266 | 0.899 | |
| None | 16.8 ± 0.13 | 75 | 17.0 ± 0.09 | 310 | |||
| None | 17.0 ± 0.09 | 303 | 16.8 ± 0.14 | 82 | 0.288 | ||
| Total yield (%) | None | 53.2 ± 0.33 | 119 | 53.0 ± 0.27 | 266 | 0.522 | |
| None | 52.8 ± 0.38 | 75 | 53.2 ± 0.26 | 310 | 0.354 | ||
| None | 53.1 ± 0.26 | 303 | 53.0 ± 0.42 | 82 | 0.722 | ||
| Proportion leg yield (%)† | None | 40.5 ± 0.11 | 119 | 40.6 ± 0.08 | 266 | 0.726 | |
| None | 40.8 ± 0.13 | 75 | 40.5 ± 0.07 | 310 | 0.057 | ||
| None | 40.5 ± 0.08 | 303 | 40.7 ± 0.14 | 82 | 0.282 | ||
| Proportion loin yield (%)† | None | 27.6 ± 0.08 | 119 | 27.5 ± 0.06 | 266 | 0.263 | |
| None | 27.6 ± 0.11 | 75 | 27.5 ± 0.06 | 310 | 0.805 | ||
| None | 27.5± 0.06 | 303 | 27.6 ± 0.11 | 82 | 0.399 | ||
| Proportion shoulder yield (%)† | None | 31.9 ± 0.11 | 119 | 31.9 ± 0.08 | 266 | 0.592 | |
| None | 31.7 ± 0.13 | 75 | 32.0 ± 0.07 | 310 | 0.035 | ||
| None | 32.0 ± 0.08 | 303 | 31.7 ± 0.14 | 82 | 0.078 | ||
| 31.6 ± 0.13 | 75 | 31.9 ± 0.09 | 310 | 0.095 | |||
| 31.9 ± 0.09 | 303 | 31.7 ± 0.14 | 82 | 0.452 |
1Estimated means and standard errors from Linear Mixed-Models including “sire” as a random factor and “birth weight” as a covariate, except †where “sire” was fitted as a random factor and “birth rank” as a fixed factor (P < 0.05 in bold).
2H-W = hot carcass weight. The weight of the carcass minus the pelt, head and gut.