Literature DB >> 26196780

Modeling spatial effects of PM(2.5) on term low birth weight in Los Angeles County.

Eric Coker1, Jokay Ghosh2, Michael Jerrett3, Virgilio Gomez-Rubio4, Bernardo Beckerman3, Myles Cockburn5, Silvia Liverani6, Jason Su3, Arthur Li7, Molly L Kile8, Beate Ritz2, John Molitor8.   

Abstract

Air pollution epidemiological studies suggest that elevated exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) is associated with higher prevalence of term low birth weight (TLBW). Previous studies have generally assumed the exposure-response of PM2.5 on TLBW to be the same throughout a large geographical area. Health effects related to PM2.5 exposures, however, may not be uniformly distributed spatially, creating a need for studies that explicitly investigate the spatial distribution of the exposure-response relationship between individual-level exposure to PM2.5 and TLBW. Here, we examine the overall and spatially varying exposure-response relationship between PM2.5 and TLBW throughout urban Los Angeles (LA) County, California. We estimated PM2.5 from a combination of land use regression (LUR), aerosol optical depth from remote sensing, and atmospheric modeling techniques. Exposures were assigned to LA County individual pregnancies identified from electronic birth certificates between the years 1995-2006 (N=1,359,284) provided by the California Department of Public Health. We used a single pollutant multivariate logistic regression model, with multilevel spatially structured and unstructured random effects set in a Bayesian framework to estimate global and spatially varying pollutant effects on TLBW at the census tract level. Overall, increased PM2.5 level was associated with higher prevalence of TLBW county-wide. The spatial random effects model, however, demonstrated that the exposure-response for PM2.5 and TLBW was not uniform across urban LA County. Rather, the magnitude and certainty of the exposure-response estimates for PM2.5 on log odds of TLBW were greatest in the urban core of Central and Southern LA County census tracts. These results suggest that the effects may be spatially patterned, and that simply estimating global pollutant effects obscures disparities suggested by spatial patterns of effects. Studies that incorporate spatial multilevel modeling with random coefficients allow us to identify areas where air pollutant effects on adverse birth outcomes may be most severe and policies to further reduce air pollution might be most effective.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Air pollution; Multilevel modeling; PM(2.5); Spatial effects; Term low birth weight

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26196780     DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2015.06.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   6.498


  10 in total

1.  Associations between maternal exposure to air pollution and birth outcomes: a retrospective cohort study in Taizhou, China.

Authors:  Lin Ye; Yinwen Ji; Wei Lv; Yining Zhu; Chuncheng Lu; Bo Xu; Yankai Xia
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  Multi-pollutant Modeling Through Examination of Susceptible Subpopulations Using Profile Regression.

Authors:  Eric Coker; Silvia Liverani; Jason G Su; John Molitor
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2018-03

3.  A quantile regression approach to examine fine particles, term low birth weight, and racial/ethnic disparities.

Authors:  Lara Schwarz; Tim Bruckner; Sindana D Ilango; Paige Sheridan; Rupa Basu; Tarik Benmarhnia
Journal:  Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2019-07-11

4.  Trimester specific PM2.5 exposure and fetal growth in Ohio, 2007-2010.

Authors:  Zana Percy; Emily DeFranco; Fan Xu; Eric S Hall; Erin N Haynes; David Jones; Louis J Muglia; Aimin Chen
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 6.498

5.  Spatial variability of the effect of air pollution on term birth weight: evaluating influential factors using Bayesian hierarchical models.

Authors:  Lianfa Li; Olivier Laurent; Jun Wu
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 5.984

6.  Effect of Environmental Factors on Low Weight in Non-Premature Births: A Time Series Analysis.

Authors:  Julio Díaz; Virginia Arroyo; Cristina Ortiz; Rocío Carmona; Cristina Linares
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Applications of Space Technologies to Global Health: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Damien Dietrich; Ralitza Dekova; Stephan Davy; Guillaume Fahrni; Antoine Geissbühler
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 8.  Spatial Modelling Tools to Integrate Public Health and Environmental Science, Illustrated with Infectious Cryptosporidiosis.

Authors:  Aparna Lal
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Traffic exhaust to wildfires: PM2.5 measurements with fixed and portable, low-cost LoRaWAN-connected sensors.

Authors:  Hugh Forehead; Johan Barthelemy; Bilal Arshad; Nicolas Verstaevel; Owen Price; Pascal Perez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Low birth weight and PM2.5 in Puerto Rico.

Authors:  Kipruto Kirwa; Rafael McConnell-Rios; Justin Manjourides; J Cordero; A Alshawabekeh; Helen H Suh
Journal:  Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2019-08
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.