Literature DB >> 26195786

Conformational propensities of intrinsically disordered proteins influence the mechanism of binding and folding.

Munehito Arai1, Kenji Sugase2, H Jane Dyson2, Peter E Wright3.   

Abstract

Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) frequently function in protein interaction networks that regulate crucial cellular signaling pathways. Many IDPs undergo transitions from disordered conformational ensembles to folded structures upon binding to their cellular targets. Several possible binding mechanisms for coupled folding and binding have been identified: folding of the IDP after association with the target ("induced fit"), or binding of a prefolded state in the conformational ensemble of the IDP to the target protein ("conformational selection"), or some combination of these two extremes. The interaction of the intrinsically disordered phosphorylated kinase-inducible domain (pKID) of the cAMP-response element binding (CREB) protein with the KIX domain of a general transcriptional coactivator CREB-binding protein (CBP) provides an example of the induced-fit mechanism. Here we show by NMR relaxation dispersion experiments that a different intrinsically disordered ligand, the transactivation domain of the transcription factor c-Myb, interacts with KIX at the same site as pKID but via a different binding mechanism that involves elements of conformational selection and induced fit. In contrast to pKID, the c-Myb activation domain has a strong propensity for spontaneous helix formation in its N-terminal region, which binds to KIX in a predominantly folded conformation. The C-terminal region of c-Myb exhibits a much smaller helical propensity and likely folds via an induced-fit process after binding to KIX. We propose that the intrinsic secondary structure propensities of pKID and c-Myb determine their binding mechanisms, consistent with their functions as inducible and constitutive transcriptional activators.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NMR relaxation; coupled folding and binding; intrinsically disordered protein; transcriptional activator c-Myb; transcriptional coactivator CBP

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26195786      PMCID: PMC4534220          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1512799112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  41 in total

Review 1.  CBP/p300 in cell growth, transformation, and development.

Authors:  R H Goodman; S Smolik
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 2.  Intrinsically unstructured proteins: re-assessing the protein structure-function paradigm.

Authors:  P E Wright; H J Dyson
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-10-22       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Structure of the transition state for the binding of c-Myb and KIX highlights an unexpected order for a disordered system.

Authors:  Rajanish Giri; Angela Morrone; Angelo Toto; Maurizio Brunori; Stefano Gianni
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Solution structure of the KIX domain of CBP bound to the transactivation domain of CREB: a model for activator:coactivator interactions.

Authors:  I Radhakrishnan; G C Pérez-Alvarado; D Parker; H J Dyson; M R Montminy; P E Wright
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1997-12-12       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  NMRPipe: a multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes.

Authors:  F Delaglio; S Grzesiek; G W Vuister; G Zhu; J Pfeifer; A Bax
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.835

6.  Cooperativity in transcription factor binding to the coactivator CREB-binding protein (CBP). The mixed lineage leukemia protein (MLL) activation domain binds to an allosteric site on the KIX domain.

Authors:  Natalie K Goto; Tsaffrir Zor; Maria Martinez-Yamout; H Jane Dyson; Peter E Wright
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-08-29       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Phosphorylation of CREB at Ser-133 induces complex formation with CREB-binding protein via a direct mechanism.

Authors:  D Parker; K Ferreri; T Nakajima; V J LaMorte; R Evans; S C Koerber; C Hoeger; M R Montminy
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Fast and accurate fitting of relaxation dispersion data using the flexible software package GLOVE.

Authors:  Kenji Sugase; Tsuyoshi Konuma; Jonathan C Lansing; Peter E Wright
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 2.835

9.  The transition state structure for coupled binding and folding of disordered protein domains.

Authors:  Jakob Dogan; Xin Mu; Åke Engström; Per Jemth
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Residual structures, conformational fluctuations, and electrostatic interactions in the synergistic folding of two intrinsically disordered proteins.

Authors:  Weihong Zhang; Debabani Ganguly; Jianhan Chen
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  88 in total

Review 1.  Features of molecular recognition of intrinsically disordered proteins via coupled folding and binding.

Authors:  Jing Yang; Meng Gao; Junwen Xiong; Zhengding Su; Yongqi Huang
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Concomitant disorder and high-affinity zinc binding in the human zinc- and iron-regulated transport protein 4 intracellular loop.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Bafaro; Mark W Maciejewski; Jeffrey C Hoch; Robert E Dempski
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Structural basis for cooperative regulation of KIX-mediated transcription pathways by the HTLV-1 HBZ activation domain.

Authors:  Ke Yang; Robyn L Stanfield; Maria A Martinez-Yamout; H Jane Dyson; Ian A Wilson; Peter E Wright
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The dock-and-coalesce mechanism for the association of a WASP disordered region with the Cdc42 GTPase.

Authors:  Li Ou; Megan Matthews; Xiaodong Pang; Huan-Xiang Zhou
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 5.542

Review 5.  Droplet organelles?

Authors:  Edward M Courchaine; Alice Lu; Karla M Neugebauer
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 6.  Dynamic Protein Interaction Networks and New Structural Paradigms in Signaling.

Authors:  Veronika Csizmok; Ariele Viacava Follis; Richard W Kriwacki; Julie D Forman-Kay
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 7.  Templated folding of intrinsically disordered proteins.

Authors:  Angelo Toto; Francesca Malagrinò; Lorenzo Visconti; Francesca Troilo; Livia Pagano; Maurizio Brunori; Per Jemth; Stefano Gianni
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Revealing the Hidden Sensitivity of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins to their Chemical Environment.

Authors:  David Moses; Feng Yu; Garrett M Ginell; Nora M Shamoon; Patrick S Koenig; Alex S Holehouse; Shahar Sukenik
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 6.475

9.  Conformational Dynamics in Extended RGD-Containing Peptides.

Authors:  William R Lindemann; Alexander J Mijalis; José L Alonso; Peter P Borbat; Jack H Freed; M Amin Arnaout; Bradley L Pentelute; Julia H Ortony
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 6.988

10.  Dynamics of the Extended String-Like Interaction of TFIIE with the p62 Subunit of TFIIH.

Authors:  Masahiko Okuda; Junichi Higo; Tadashi Komatsu; Tsuyoshi Konuma; Kenji Sugase; Yoshifumi Nishimura
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.