Literature DB >> 26195682

Impact of Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines on Screening for Chlamydia.

Allison Ursu1, Ananda Sen2, Mack Ruffin3.   

Abstract

The highest prevalence of chlamydia infection in the United States is among people aged 15 to 24 years. We assessed the impact of not doing routine cervical cancer screening on the rates of chlamydia screening in women aged 15 to 21 years. We classified visits to family medicine ambulatory clinics according to their timing relative to the 2009 guideline change that led to more restrictive cervical cancer screening. Women had higher odds of being screened for chlamydia before vs after the guideline change (odds ratio = 13.97; 95% CI, 9.17-21.29; P <.001). Chlamydia and cervical cancer screening need to be uncoupled and new screening opportunities should be identified.
© 2015 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Papanicolaou test; cervical cancer screening; chlamydia screening; primary care; sexually transmitted infection screening

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26195682      PMCID: PMC4508178          DOI: 10.1370/afm.1811

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Fam Med        ISSN: 1544-1709            Impact factor:   5.166


  8 in total

1.  2009 cervical cytology guidelines and chlamydia testing among sexually active young women.

Authors:  Guoyu Tao; Karen W Hoover; Charlotte K Kent
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  ACOG Committee Opinion #300: Cervical cancer screening in adolescents.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  ACOG Practice Bulletin no. 109: Cervical cytology screening.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Opportunistic screening for chlamydial infection at time of cervical smear testing in general practice: prevalence study.

Authors:  P Oakeshott; S Kerry; S Hay; P Hay
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-01-31

5.  Factors associated with screening for sexually transmitted infections.

Authors:  Stephanie L Skala; Gina M Secura; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Screening for Chlamydia and gonorrhea: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors:  Michael L LeFevre
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 7.  Screening pelvic examination in adult women: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians.

Authors:  Amir Qaseem; Linda L Humphrey; Russell Harris; Melissa Starkey; Thomas D Denberg
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  A practice improvement intervention increases chlamydia screening among young women at a women's health practice.

Authors:  Lindsey Diane Kettinger
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2012-11-26
  8 in total
  5 in total

1.  The Effect of Changes in Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines on Chlamydia Testing.

Authors:  Michelle S Naimer; Jeffrey C Kwong; Deepit Bhatia; Rahim Moineddin; Michael Whelan; Michael A Campitelli; Liane Macdonald; Aisha Lofters; Ashleigh Tuite; Tali Bogler; Joanne A Permaul; Warren J McIsaac
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 5.166

2.  Cervicitis: Balancing the Goals of Empiric Therapy and Antimicrobial Stewardship to Improve Women's Health.

Authors:  Jodie Dionne-Odom; Jeanne Marrazzo
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 2.830

3.  Linking common non-coding RNAs of human lung cancer and M. tuberculosis.

Authors:  Debmalya Barh; Sandeep Tiwari; Ranjith N Kumavath; Preetam Ghosh; Vasco Azevedo
Journal:  Bioinformation       Date:  2018-06-30

4.  From Promoting Healthy Sexual Functioning to Managing Biomedical Sexual Dysfunction: Health Professional Views of Youth Sexual Health.

Authors:  Lucia F O'Sullivan; Jo Ann Majerovich; Judith Wuest
Journal:  SAGE Open Nurs       Date:  2019-05-03

5.  Unintended Consequences Following the 2014 American Academy of Pediatrics Policy Change for Palivizumab Prophylaxis among Infants Born at Less than 29 Weeks' Gestation.

Authors:  Mitchell Goldstein; Leonard R Krilov; Jaime Fergie; Lance Brannman; Sally W Wade; Amanda M Kong; Christopher S Ambrose
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 1.862

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.