| Literature DB >> 26194346 |
Peirong Huang1, Fenghua Wang1, Birendra Kumar Sah2, Junhai Jiang3, Zhentian Ni2, Jentso Wang2, Xiaodong Sun1.
Abstract
Contrasting results have been reported regarding the associations between plasma total homocysteine (tHcy) and B vitamin levels and age-related macular degeneration (AMD) risk. Thus, we aimed to systematically evaluate these associations. Relevant case control studies in English were identified via a thorough search of the PubMed, Medline, and Embase databases from inception to June 2014. The results were pooled using Review Manager 5.2.1. Eleven studies (including 1072 cases and 1202 controls) were eligible for analysis of tHcy levels; additionally, 3 studies (including 152 cases and 98 controls) were eligible for analysis of folic acid and vitamin B12 levels. The cumulative results demonstrated that the plasma tHcy level among the AMD cases was 2.67 μmol/L (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.60-3.74) higher than that among the controls. In contrast, the vitamin B12 level among the AMD cases was 64.16 pg/mL (95% CI, 19.32-109.00) lower than that among the controls. Subgroup analyses showed that the folic acid level was 1.66 ng/mL (95% CI, 0.10-3.21) lower for the wet type. Together, the results demonstrated that AMD is associated with elevated tHcy levels and decreased vitamin B12 levels. Plasma tHcy may act as a modulator of the risk for AMD based on the current evidence.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26194346 PMCID: PMC4508850 DOI: 10.1038/srep10585
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Flow chart of the study search and selection strategies.
Study design and baseline characteristics of the included studies.
| Axer-Siegel | 2004, Israel | Clinic-based, prospective, cross-sectional | tHcy | group 1. wAMD | group 1. n = 59 | 78 ± 8.4 | 42.37 | Ophthalmologist examination | NA |
| group 2. dAMD | group 2. n = 58 | 76.3 ± 8.4 | 41.38 | ||||||
| group 3. control | group 3. n = 56 | 76.3 ± 8.4 | 48.21 | ||||||
| Nowak | 2005, Poland | Clinic-based, case-control | tHcy | group 1. wAMD | group 1. n = 30 | 66.2 ± 3.6 | NA | Ophthalmologist examination | NA |
| B9, B12 | group 2. control | group 2. n = 20 | 65.8 ± 5.2 | NA | |||||
| Coral | 2006, India | Clinic-based, case-control | tHcy | group 1. wAMD | group 1. n = 16 | 66 (51–82) | 68.75 | Photographic grading | AREDS classification system |
| GSH, tSH | group 2. control | group 2. n = 20 | 62 (55–75) | 40 | |||||
| Kamburoglu | 2006, Turkey | Clinic-based, prospective, cross-sectional | tHcy | group 1. wAMD | group 1. n = 30 | 69.7 ± 7.2 | 50 | Ophthalmologist examination | NA |
| B9, B12 | group 2. dAMD | group 2. n = 30 | 69.9 ± 6.8 | 43.33 | |||||
| group 3. control | group 3. n = 30 | 69.9 ± 7.0 | 36.67 | ||||||
| Seddon | 2006, USA | Population-based, cross-sectional, case-control | tHcy | group 1. Late AMD | group 1. n = 222 | 71 ± 5.1 | 45 | Photographic grading | AREDS classification system |
| group 2. control | group 2. n = 184 | 67 ± 4.2 | 36 | ||||||
| Wang | 2008, Australia | Population-based, case-control | tHcy | group 1. Early and late AMD | group 1. n = 278 | 75.6 ± 8.5 | NA | Photographic grading | Wisconsin age-related maculopathy grading system |
| group 2. control | group 2. n = 557 | 74.9 ± 7.9 | NA | ||||||
| Ates | 2009, Turkey | Clinic-based, cross-sectional | tHcy | group 1. wAMD | group 1. n = 40 | 63.3 ± 5 | 45 | Ophthalmologist examination | NA |
| group 2. control | group 2. n = 40 | 61 ± 4 | NA | ||||||
| Javadzadeh | 2010, Iran | Clinic-based, case-control | tHcy | group 1. wAMD | group 1. n = 45 | 71 ± 7 | 40 | Ophthalmologist examination | NA |
| group 2. control | group 2. n = 45 | 69 ± 5 | 40 | ||||||
| Ghosh | 2013, India | Clinic-based, case-control | tHcy | group 1. wAMD | group 1. n = 12 | 67.4 ± 6.5 | 41.67 | Ophthalmologist examination | NA |
| group 2. dAMD | group 2. n = 20 | 45 | |||||||
| group 3. control | group 3. n = 32 | 66.5 ± 5.9 | 43.75 | ||||||
| Obeid | 2013, Germany | Clinic-based, case-control | tHcy | group 1. wAMD | group 1. n = 31 | 78 (67–86) | 51.61 | Ophthalmologist examination | NA |
| B9, B12 | group 2. dAMD | group 2. n = 38 | 77 (68–86) | 26.32 | |||||
| group 3. control | group 3. n = 48 | 74 (60–81) | 48.94 | ||||||
| Mulero | 2014, Spain | Clinic-based, cross-sectional, case-control | tHcy | group 1. wAMD | group 1. n = 163 | 71 ± 7.3 | 49 | Ophthalmologist examination | NA |
| group 2. control | group 2. n = 170 | 71 ± 6.7 | 52 | Ophthalmologist examination | NA |
AMD: age-related macular degeneration; PCT: percentage; tHcy: total homocysteine; NA: not available; AREDS: Age-Related Eye Disease Study; GSH: glutathione; tSH: thiol content.
Figure 2Forest plots for the association of the plasma tHcy levels with AMD.
Figure 3Forest plots for the association of the serum folic acid levels with AMD.
Figure 4Forest plots for the association of the serum vitamin B12 levels with AMD.
Fail-safe number.
| tHcy with any AMD | 1292.03 |
| tHcy with late AMD | 1239.02 |
| tHcy with wet AMD | 900.91 |
| tHcy with dry AMD | 9.47 |
| Folic acid with late AMD | 3.81 |
| Folic acid with wet AMD | 1.17 |
| Folic acid with dry AMD | -1.68 |
| Vitamin B12 with late AMD | 20.97 |
| Vitamin B12 with wet AMD | 10.88 |
| Vitamin B12 with dry AMD | −0.63 |
Nfs: fail-safe number; tHcy: total homocysteine; AMD: age-related macular degeneration.