| Literature DB >> 21364877 |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mounting evidence has suggested that α-adducin and G-protein β3 (GNB3) genes are logical candidates for salt-sensitive hypertension. Some, but not all, studies have reported that α-adducin G460T and GNB3 C825T polymorphisms may influence the risk of the disease. To comprehensively address this issue, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the influence of these two polymorphisms on hypertension and potential biases in Chinese.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21364877 PMCID: PMC3045422 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017052
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1The geographical distributions (as marked by pentagram) of all eligible studies in China map.
Meta-analysis of the association between α-adducin gene G460T polymorphism and hypertension risk.
| Comparisons | Pooled OR (95% CI) | Z (P) |
|
| 460T vs. 460G | 1.05 (0.95, 1.16) | 0.95 (0.340) | 58.6 |
| 460GT vs. 460GG | 1.00 (0.91, 1.11) | 0.07 (0.945) | 2.7 |
| 460TT vs. 460GG | 1.09 (0.90, 1.32) | 0.84 (0.402) | 56.8 |
| 460GT+TT vs. 460GG | 1.04 (0.92, 1.18) | 0.68 (0.496) | 34.7 |
| 460TT vs. 460GT+460GG | 1.05 (0.90, 1.23) | 0.63 (0.528) | 53.9 |
Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Meta-analysis of the association between GNB3 gene C825T polymorphism and hypertension risk.
| Comparisons | Pooled OR (95% CI) | Z (P) |
|
| 825T vs. 825C | 1.02 (0.95, 1.10) | 0.58 (0.560) | 24.7 |
| 825CT vs. 825CC | 1.05 (0.93, 1.19) | 0.84 (0.400) | 18.8 |
| 825TT vs. 825CC | 1.01 (0.89, 1.15) | 0.18 (0.858) | 5.2 |
| 825CT+TT vs. 825CC | 1.05 (0.93, 1.19) | 0.81 (0.417) | 31.6 |
| 825TT vs. 825CT+825CC | 0.99 (0.90, 1.10) | 0.12 (0.908) | 0.0 |
Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 2Pooled random-effects-based odds ratio of developing hypertension for α-adducin gene 460T allele versus 460G allele by study design (pane A) and area (pane B).
Figure 3Pooled random-effects-based odds ratio of developing hypertension for GNB3 gene 825T allele versus 825C allele by study design (pane A) and area (pane B).
Meta-regression analysis of α-adducin gene G460T and GNB3 gene C825T polymorphisms with covariates of interest.
| Variables | α-adducin gene G460T | GNB3 gene C825T | ||||||
| Coef. | 95% CI | t | P | Coef. | 95% CI | t | P | |
|
| ||||||||
| Study design | 0.23 | (−0.10, 0.56) | 2.24 | 0.111 | −0.14 | (−0.34, 0.06) | −2.01 | 0.115 |
| Area | 0.21 | (−0.01, 0.43) | 3.02 | 0.057 | 0.21 | (−0.03, 0.45) | 2.41 | 0.074 |
| Diff-age | −0.16 | (−0.44, 0.11) | −1.90 | 0.154 | −0.04 | (−0.10, 0.02) | −1.74 | 0.156 |
| Diff-gender | −1.79 | (−6.49, 2.92) | −1.21 | 0.314 | −0.003 | (−0.03, 0.03) | −0.27 | 0.797 |
| Diff-BMI | −0.16 | (−0.37, 0.04) | −2.56 | 0.083 | −0.001 | (−0.18, 0.18) | −0.03 | 0.980 |
|
| ||||||||
| Study design | −0.11 | (−0.81, 0.60) | −0.49 | 0.659 | 0.02 | (−0.21, 0.24) | 0.19 | 0.859 |
| Area | 0.19 | (−0.28, 0.65) | 1.28 | 0.290 | 0.82 | (0.04, 1.59) | 2.94 | 0.043 |
| Ave-age | −0.04 | (−0.13, 0.05) | −1.29 | 0.287 | −0.01 | (−0.03, 0.18) | −0.70 | 0.522 |
| Ave-gender | 0.34 | (−2.53, 3.20) | 0.37 | 0.734 | −0.001 | (−0.02 0.02) | −0.11 | 0.919 |
| Ave-BMI | 0.06 | (−0.11, 0.23) | 1.16 | 0.330 | −0.02 | (−0.07, 0.02) | −1.28 | 0.270 |
Abbreviations: Coef., coefficient; CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index. Diff-age (-gender and -BMI) means the age (percent of male and BMI) differences between cases and controls (Model 1). Ave-age (-gender and -BMI) means the average age (percent of male and BMI) of both groups (Model 2).
Figure 4Funnel plots for studies investigating the effect of α-adducin gene G460T (pane A) and GNB3 gene C825T (pane B) polymorphisms on the risk of hypertension.
Vertical axis represents the log of OR; horizontal axis represents the SE of log(OR). Funnel plots are drawn with 95% confidence limits. OR, odds ratio; SE, standard error. The graphic symbols represents the data in the plot be sized proportional to the inverse variance.