Literature DB >> 26194069

Identifiability of PBPK models with applications to dimethylarsinic acid exposure.

Ramon I Garcia1, Joseph G Ibrahim1, John F Wambaugh2, Elaina M Kenyon3, R Woodrow Setzer4.   

Abstract

Any statistical model should be identifiable in order for estimates and tests using it to be meaningful. We consider statistical analysis of physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models in which parameters cannot be estimated precisely from available data, and discuss different types of identifiability that occur in PBPK models and give reasons why they occur. We particularly focus on how the mathematical structure of a PBPK model and lack of appropriate data can lead to statistical models in which it is impossible to estimate at least some parameters precisely. Methods are reviewed which can determine whether a purely linear PBPK model is globally identifiable. We propose a theorem which determines when identifiability at a set of finite and specific values of the mathematical PBPK model (global discete identifiability) implies identifiability of the statistical model. However, we are unable to establish conditions that imply global discrete identifiability, and conclude that the only safe approach to analysis of PBPK models involves Bayesian analysis with truncated priors. Finally, computational issues regarding posterior simulations of PBPK models are discussed. The methodology is very general and can be applied to numerous PBPK models which can be expressed as linear time-invariant systems. A real data set of a PBPK model for exposure to dimethyl arsinic acid (DMA(V)) is presented to illustrate the proposed methodology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dimethyl arsinic acid; Gibbs sampling; Identifiability; Metropolis–Hasting algorithm; PBPK Models

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26194069     DOI: 10.1007/s10928-015-9424-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn        ISSN: 1567-567X            Impact factor:   2.745


  16 in total

1.  Stochastic relaxation, gibbs distributions, and the bayesian restoration of images.

Authors:  S Geman; D Geman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 6.226

2.  Applications of physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling and simulation during regulatory review.

Authors:  P Zhao; L Zhang; J A Grillo; Q Liu; J M Bullock; Y J Moon; P Song; S S Brar; R Madabushi; T C Wu; B P Booth; N A Rahman; K S Reynolds; E Gil Berglund; L J Lesko; S-M Huang
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  Characterizing uncertainty and variability in physiologically based pharmacokinetic models: state of the science and needs for research and implementation.

Authors:  Hugh A Barton; Weihsueh A Chiu; R Woodrow Setzer; Melvin E Andersen; A John Bailer; Frédéric Y Bois; Robert S Dewoskin; Sean Hays; Gunnar Johanson; Nancy Jones; George Loizou; Robert C Macphail; Christopher J Portier; Martin Spendiff; Yu-Mei Tan
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  A physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for intravenous and ingested dimethylarsinic acid in mice.

Authors:  Marina V Evans; Sean M Dowd; Elaina M Kenyon; Michael F Hughes; Hisham A El-Masri
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2008-04-21       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 5.  A concise review of the toxicity and carcinogenicity of dimethylarsinic acid.

Authors:  E M Kenyon; M F Hughes
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2001-03-07       Impact factor: 4.221

6.  Parameter and structural identifiability concepts and ambiguities: a critical review and analysis.

Authors:  C Cobelli; J J DiStefano
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1980-07

7.  Dose-dependent effects on the disposition of monomethylarsonic acid and dimethylarsinic acid in the mouse after intravenous administration.

Authors:  M F Hughes; E M Kenyon
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  1998-01-23

8.  Dose-dependent effects on tissue distribution and metabolism of dimethylarsinic acid in the mouse after intravenous administration.

Authors:  M F Hughes; L M Del Razo; E M Kenyon
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2000-02-21       Impact factor: 4.221

9.  Blood-flow distribution in the mouse.

Authors:  W T Stott; M D Dryzga; J C Ramsey
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 3.446

10.  Tissue dosimetry, metabolism and excretion of pentavalent and trivalent dimethylated arsenic in mice after oral administration.

Authors:  Michael F Hughes; Vicenta Devesa; Blakely M Adair; Sean D Conklin; John T Creed; Miroslav Styblo; Elaina M Kenyon; David J Thomas
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 4.219

View more
  10 in total

1.  Population pharmacokinetic reanalysis of a Diazepam PBPK model: a comparison of Stan and GNU MCSim.

Authors:  Periklis Tsiros; Frederic Y Bois; Aristides Dokoumetzidis; Georgia Tsiliki; Haralambos Sarimveis
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 2.745

2.  Evaluating In Vitro-In Vivo Extrapolation of Toxicokinetics.

Authors:  John F Wambaugh; Michael F Hughes; Caroline L Ring; Denise K MacMillan; Jermaine Ford; Timothy R Fennell; Sherry R Black; Rodney W Snyder; Nisha S Sipes; Barbara A Wetmore; Joost Westerhout; R Woodrow Setzer; Robert G Pearce; Jane Ellen Simmons; Russell S Thomas
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Assessing Toxicokinetic Uncertainty and Variability in Risk Prioritization.

Authors:  John F Wambaugh; Barbara A Wetmore; Caroline L Ring; Chantel I Nicolas; Robert G Pearce; Gregory S Honda; Roger Dinallo; Derek Angus; Jon Gilbert; Teresa Sierra; Akshay Badrinarayanan; Bradley Snodgrass; Adam Brockman; Chris Strock; R Woodrow Setzer; Russell S Thomas
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Evaluation and calibration of high-throughput predictions of chemical distribution to tissues.

Authors:  Robert G Pearce; R Woodrow Setzer; Jimena L Davis; John F Wambaugh
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2017-10-14       Impact factor: 2.745

5.  What do we mean by identifiability in mixed effects models?

Authors:  Marc Lavielle; Leon Aarons
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 2.745

6.  Quantitative Characterization of Population-Wide Tissue- and Metabolite-Specific Variability in Perchloroethylene Toxicokinetics in Male Mice.

Authors:  Chimeddulam Dalaijamts; Joseph A Cichocki; Yu-Syuan Luo; Ivan Rusyn; Weihsueh A Chiu
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 7.  PBPK model reporting template for chemical risk assessment applications.

Authors:  Yu-Mei Tan; Melissa Chan; Amechi Chukwudebe; Jeanne Domoradzki; Jeffrey Fisher; C Eric Hack; Paul Hinderliter; Kota Hirasawa; Jeremy Leonard; Annie Lumen; Alicia Paini; Hua Qian; Patricia Ruiz; John Wambaugh; Fagen Zhang; Michelle Embry
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 3.271

Review 8.  Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model Qualification and Reporting Procedures for Regulatory Submissions: A Consortium Perspective.

Authors:  Mohamad Shebley; Punam Sandhu; Arian Emami Riedmaier; Masoud Jamei; Rangaraj Narayanan; Aarti Patel; Sheila Annie Peters; Venkatesh Pilla Reddy; Ming Zheng; Loeckie de Zwart; Maud Beneton; Francois Bouzom; Jun Chen; Yuan Chen; Yumi Cleary; Christiane Collins; Gemma L Dickinson; Nassim Djebli; Heidi J Einolf; Iain Gardner; Felix Huth; Faraz Kazmi; Feras Khalil; Jing Lin; Aleksandrs Odinecs; Chirag Patel; Haojing Rong; Edgar Schuck; Pradeep Sharma; Shu-Pei Wu; Yang Xu; Shinji Yamazaki; Kenta Yoshida; Malcolm Rowland
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 6.875

9.  Reduction of a Whole-Body Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model to Stabilise the Bayesian Analysis of Clinical Data.

Authors:  Thierry Wendling; Nikolaos Tsamandouras; Swati Dumitras; Etienne Pigeolet; Kayode Ogungbenro; Leon Aarons
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 4.009

10.  Applying a Global Sensitivity Analysis Workflow to Improve the Computational Efficiencies in Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling.

Authors:  Nan-Hung Hsieh; Brad Reisfeld; Frederic Y Bois; Weihsueh A Chiu
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 5.810

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.