Hiroko Machida1, Aida Moeini1, Lynda D Roman2, Koji Matsuo3. 1. Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 2. Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 3. Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Electronic address: koji.matsuo@med.usc.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the effectiveness of topical imiquimod therapy for vulvar Paget's disease. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted using three public search engines with entry keywords "Paget's disease" and "imiquimod". Case reports describing imiquimod treatment for vulvar Paget's disease were examined for demographics, treatment patterns, and outcome (63 cases). RESULTS: Median age was 68, and nearly a half of cases were recurrent disease (50.8%) with surgical resection being the most common prior treatment modality (62.5%). All cases used 5% imiquimod and the median treatment duration was 4months. The most common initial treatment frequency was 3-4times/week (68.3%) followed by 5-7 (17.4%) and 1-2times/week (14.3%). Frequency-reduction due to adverse effects was seen in 9.5% with the initial 5-7times/week regimen being associated with the highest reduction rate (1-2, 3-4, and 5-7times/week: 0%, 2.3%, and 81.8%, p<0.01). In 46 (73.0%) cases, a complete remission (CR) to imiquimod therapy was reported, with 2, 4, and 6-month cumulative CR rates being 9.8%, 31.1%, and 71.6%, respectively. With median follow-up duration of 12months after the completion of imiquimod treatment, 2 (5.7%) of the 35 women who had a CR developed disease recurrence. Age, disease status (primary versus recurrent), and treatment frequency after dose reduction were not associated with CR rates (all, p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Our results suggested that imiquimod therapy may be an effective possible treatment option for vulvar Paget's disease, especially for women who have experienced recurrence after multiple surgical resections or who are with poor surgical candidates.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the effectiveness of topical imiquimod therapy for vulvar Paget's disease. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted using three public search engines with entry keywords "Paget's disease" and "imiquimod". Case reports describing imiquimod treatment for vulvar Paget's disease were examined for demographics, treatment patterns, and outcome (63 cases). RESULTS: Median age was 68, and nearly a half of cases were recurrent disease (50.8%) with surgical resection being the most common prior treatment modality (62.5%). All cases used 5% imiquimod and the median treatment duration was 4months. The most common initial treatment frequency was 3-4times/week (68.3%) followed by 5-7 (17.4%) and 1-2times/week (14.3%). Frequency-reduction due to adverse effects was seen in 9.5% with the initial 5-7times/week regimen being associated with the highest reduction rate (1-2, 3-4, and 5-7times/week: 0%, 2.3%, and 81.8%, p<0.01). In 46 (73.0%) cases, a complete remission (CR) to imiquimod therapy was reported, with 2, 4, and 6-month cumulative CR rates being 9.8%, 31.1%, and 71.6%, respectively. With median follow-up duration of 12months after the completion of imiquimod treatment, 2 (5.7%) of the 35 women who had a CR developed disease recurrence. Age, disease status (primary versus recurrent), and treatment frequency after dose reduction were not associated with CR rates (all, p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Our results suggested that imiquimod therapy may be an effective possible treatment option for vulvar Paget's disease, especially for women who have experienced recurrence after multiple surgical resections or who are with poor surgical candidates.
Authors: Cristina Anton; Arthur Vicentini da Costa Luiz; Filomena Marino Carvalho; Edmund Chada Baracat; Jesus Paula Carvalho Journal: Clinics (Sao Paulo) Date: 2011 Impact factor: 2.365
Authors: Alexander Luyten; Philipp Sörgel; Andreas Clad; Friederike Gieseking; Karin Maass-Poppenhusen; Ralph J Lellé; Philipp Harter; Nina Buttmann; Karl Ulrich Petry Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2014-01-14 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Renee A Cowan; Destin R Black; Lien N Hoang; Kay J Park; Robert A Soslow; Floor J Backes; Ginger J Gardner; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Mario M Leitao; Eric L Eisenhauer; Dennis S Chi Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2016-05-05 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Gabriel E Molina; Saami Khalifian; Jamie L Mull; Lu Chen; Ilana S Rosman; Beverly E Faulkner-Jones; Kenneth H Ngo; Shadmehr Demehri; Lynn A Cornelius; Peggy A Wu Journal: JAMA Dermatol Date: 2019-05-01 Impact factor: 10.282
Authors: Michelle van der Linden; Kim Meeuwis; Colette van Hees; Eleonora van Dorst; Johan Bulten; Tjalling Bosse; Joanna IntHout; Dorry Boll; Brigitte Slangen; Manon van Seters; Marc van Beurden; Mariëtte van Poelgeest; Joanne de Hullu Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2017-09-06