Literature DB >> 26192929

Chickens prefer beautiful humans.

Stefano Ghirlanda1, Liselotte Jansson2, Magnus Enquist2.   

Abstract

We trained chickens to react to an average human female face but not to an average male face (or vice versa). In a subsequent test, the animals showed preferences for faces consistent with human sexual preferences (obtained from university students). This suggests that human preferences arise from general properties of nervous systems, rather than from face-specific adaptations. We discuss this result in the light of current debate on the meaning of sexual signals and suggest further tests of existing hypotheses about the origin of sexual preferences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Facial attractiveness; Handicap principle; Receiver bias; Sexual selection

Year:  2002        PMID: 26192929     DOI: 10.1007/s12110-002-1021-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Nat        ISSN: 1045-6767


  4 in total

1.  Facial attractiveness.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 2.  Sexual selection, receiver biases, and the evolution of sex differences.

Authors:  M J Ryan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-09-25       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness.

Authors:  D I Perrett; K J Lee; I Penton-Voak; D Rowland; S Yoshikawa; D M Burt; S P Henzi; D L Castles; S Akamatsu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-08-27       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Sex-typicality and attractiveness: are supermale and superfemale faces super-attractive?

Authors:  G Rhodes; C Hickford; L Jeffery
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2000-02
  4 in total
  8 in total

1.  Processing bias: extending sensory drive to include efficacy and efficiency in information processing.

Authors:  Julien P Renoult; Tamra C Mendelson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The Shaping of the Face Space in Early Infancy: Becoming a Native Face Processor.

Authors:  Alan Slater; Paul C Quinn; David J Kelly; Kang Lee; Christopher A Longmore; Paula R McDonald; Olivier Pascalis
Journal:  Child Dev Perspect       Date:  2010-12-01

3.  Preference for attractive faces in human infants extends beyond conspecifics.

Authors:  Paul C Quinn; David J Kelly; Kang Lee; Olivier Pascalis; Alan M Slater
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2008-01

4.  Facial Features: What Women Perceive as Attractive and What Men Consider Attractive.

Authors:  José Antonio Muñoz-Reyes; Marta Iglesias-Julios; Miguel Pita; Enrique Turiegano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Discrimination of human faces by archerfish (Toxotes chatareus).

Authors:  Cait Newport; Guy Wallis; Yarema Reshitnyk; Ulrike E Siebeck
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Stereotypical and Actual Associations of Breast Size with Mating-Relevant Traits.

Authors:  Krzysztof Kościński; Rafał Makarewicz; Zbigniew Bartoszewicz
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2019-09-27

7.  Structural imbalance promotes behavior analogous to aesthetic preference in domestic chicks.

Authors:  Mark A Elliott; Orsola Rosa Salva; Paul Mulcahy; Lucia Regolin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Differences in the Visual Perception of Symmetric Patterns in Orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus abelii) and Two Human Cultural Groups: A Comparative Eye-Tracking Study.

Authors:  Cordelia Mühlenbeck; Katja Liebal; Carla Pritsch; Thomas Jacobsen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.