Literature DB >> 26192595

Cooperative coordination as a social behavior : Experiments with an animal model.

Richard Schuster1.   

Abstract

Coordinating behavior is widespread in contexts that include courtship, aggression, and cooperation for shared outcomes. The social significance of cooperative coordination (CC) is usually downplayed by learning theorists, evolutionary biologists, and game theorists in favor of an individual behavior → outcome perspective predicated on maximizing payoffs for all participants. To more closely model CC as it occurs under free-ranging conditions, pairs of rats were rewarded for coordinated shuttling within a shared chamber with unrestricted social interaction. Results show that animals learned to work together with sensitivity to the task and type of partner. Moreover, social interaction and coordination influenced both consumption of the reward solution immediately following a session and preference for cooperation, suggesting that affective states and incentives related to cooperation extend beyond the outcomes obtained. These results support field studies by showing not only how cooperation is performed but also the importance of considering how the behavior of cooperating affects outcomes and preference for cooperating.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cooperative coordination; Incentive to cooperate; Individual behavior / outcome perspective; Laboratory models; Laboratory rats; Mutualism; Preference for cooperating; Social behavior perspective

Year:  2002        PMID: 26192595     DOI: 10.1007/s12110-002-1014-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Nat        ISSN: 1045-6767


  29 in total

1.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Affiliation and aggression in rats.

Authors:  G T Taylor
Journal:  Anim Learn Behav       Date:  1976-05

3.  Capuchin monkeys, Cebus apella fail to understand a cooperative task

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.844

4.  Reply to Roberts: cooperation is an outcome, not a mechanism

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.844

5.  Testing mutualism: a commentary on Clements & Stephens

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.844

6.  Territory tenure in song sparrows is related to song sharing with neighbours, but not to repertoire size.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.844

7.  A classification and review of cooperation procedures.

Authors:  D F Hake; R Vukelich
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  The evolution of cooperation.

Authors:  R Axelrod; W D Hamilton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-03-27       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  The integration of dominance and social bonding in primates.

Authors:  F B de Waal
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 4.875

Review 10.  Brain dopamine and reward.

Authors:  R A Wise; P P Rompre
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 24.137

View more
  7 in total

1.  Helping for change.

Authors:  Allen Neuringer; Kathryn C Oleson
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2010

Review 2.  Correlated pay-offs are key to cooperation.

Authors:  Michael Taborsky; Joachim G Frommen; Christina Riehl
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Altruistic cooperation during foraging by the Ache, and the evolved human predisposition to cooperate.

Authors:  Kim Hill
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2002-03

4.  Experimental evidence for reciprocity in allogrooming among wild-type Norway rats.

Authors:  Manon K Schweinfurth; Binia Stieger; Michael Taborsky
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  The social life of Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus).

Authors:  Manon K Schweinfurth
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Collective punishment is more effective than collective reward for promoting cooperation.

Authors:  Lei Gao; Zhen Wang; Riccardo Pansini; Yao-Tang Li; Rui-Wu Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Rats prefer mutual rewards in a prosocial choice task.

Authors:  Julen Hernandez-Lallement; Marijn van Wingerden; Christine Marx; Milan Srejic; Tobias Kalenscher
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 4.677

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.