Literature DB >> 26192253

The Risk of Distant Metastases and Cancer Specific Survival in Men with Serum Prostate Specific Antigen Values above 100 ng/ml.

Karl Stattin1, Fredrik Sandin2, Ola Bratt3, Mats Lambe4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Current EAU (European Association of Urology) guidelines state that prostate specific antigen 100 ng/ml or greater at diagnosis indicates metastatic disease. We examined the association of prostate specific antigen 100 ng/ml or greater at diagnosis with distant metastasis and prostate cancer specific survival.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 15,635 men with prostate cancer diagnosed between 1998 and 2009 who were identified in PCBaSe (Prostate Cancer Data Base Sweden 2.0) were included in a population based registry study. Prostate cancer specific survival was compared among 3 groups, including 1,879 men with prostate specific antigen 100 ng/ml or greater and negative imaging (M0), 5,642 with distant metastases on imaging (M1) and prostate specific antigen 100 ng/ml or greater, and 3,828 with M1 and prostate specific antigen less than 100 ng/ml. A fourth group consisted of 4,286 men with prostate specific antigen 100 ng/ml or greater who had not undergone imaging (Mx). The latter men were not included in the assessment of survival.
RESULTS: Of 7,521 men with prostate specific antigen 100 ng/ml or greater who underwent imaging for staging 75% were classified with M1 disease. Only 59% of 3,527 men with prostate specific antigen 100 to 300 mg/ml had distant metastases on imaging. Five-year prostate cancer specific survival was 72% (95% CI 70-74) in men with prostate specific antigen 100 ng/ml or greater and M0, 24% (95% CI 23-25) in men with prostate specific antigen 100 ng/ml or greater and M1, and 39% (95% CI 37-40) in men with prostate specific antigen less than 100 ng/ml and M1.
CONCLUSIONS: A fourth of men with prostate specific antigen 100 ng/ml or greater did not have distant metastases. They had twofold to threefold higher 5-year survival than men with distant metastases on imaging. Our findings strongly suggest that using prostate specific antigen 100 ng/ml or greater as an indicator of metastatic disease should be reconsidered.
Copyright © 2015 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Sweden; adenocarcinoma; neoplasm metastasis; prostate-specific antigen; prostatic neoplasms

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26192253     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.07.082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  5 in total

1.  Optimal time-point for 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging in assessment of prostate cancer: feasibility of sterile cold-kit tracer preparation?

Authors:  Mohsen Beheshti; Zeinab Paymani; Joana Brilhante; Hans Geinitz; Daniela Gehring; Thomas Leopoldseder; Ludovic Wouters; Christian Pirich; Wolfgang Loidl; Werner Langsteger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Prognostic Significance of Young Age and Non-Bone Metastasis at Diagnosis in Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer: a SEER Population-Based Data Analysis.

Authors:  Yadong Guo; Shiyu Mao; Aihong Zhang; Ruiliang Wang; Ziwei Zhang; Junfeng Zhang; Longsheng Wang; Wentao Zhang; Yuan Wu; Lin Ye; Bin Yang; Xudong Yao
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 4.207

3.  Prediction of metastatic prostate cancer by prostate-specific antigen in combination with T stage and Gleason Grade: Nationwide, population-based register study.

Authors:  Frederik B Thomsen; Marcus Westerberg; Hans Garmo; David Robinson; Lars Holmberg; Hans David Ulmert; Pär Stattin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Head-to-head comparison of 99mTc-PSMA and 99mTc-MDP SPECT/CT in diagnosing prostate cancer bone metastasis: a prospective, comparative imaging trial.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Zhiyi Lin; Tao Li; Yongbao Wei; Mingdian Yu; Liefu Ye; Yuqing Cai; Shengping Yang; Yanmin Zhang; Yuanying Shi; Wenxin Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Simulation model of disease incidence driven by diagnostic activity.

Authors:  Marcus Westerberg; Rolf Larsson; Lars Holmberg; Pär Stattin; Hans Garmo
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 2.373

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.