Literature DB >> 26190887

U.S. Principals' Attitudes About and Experiences with Single-Sex Schooling.

Richard A Fabes1, Erin Pahlke2, Kathrine Galligan3, Adrienne Borders4.   

Abstract

Despite a lack of scientific evidence supporting the use of single-sex education, the number of U.S. public schools offering single-sex education has increased. However, our understanding as to why decision-makers have implemented single-sex education is lacking. To address this gap, we surveyed U.S. public-school principals and assessed their attitudes about and experiences with single-sex schooling. Sixty-seven principals from single-sex schools and 193 from coeducational schools participated. The results indicated that principals who had experience with single-sex schooling tended to have more positive attitudes about single-sex schooling, viewed it as more effective, and more often evoked gender-essentialist rationales for the use of single-sex schooling than did coeducational principals. However, both single-sex and coeducational principals noted issues with single-sex schooling. It was concluded that single-sex schooling is not a silver bullet to educational reform and that when single-sex schooling is implemented, one set of issues and problems is substituted for another.

Entities:  

Keywords:  coeducation; educational reform; principals; segregation; single-sex schooling

Year:  2015        PMID: 26190887      PMCID: PMC4500932          DOI: 10.1080/03055698.2015.1005576

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Educ Stud        ISSN: 0305-5698


  8 in total

1.  Education. The pseudoscience of single-sex schooling.

Authors:  Diane F Halpern; Lise Eliot; Rebecca S Bigler; Richard A Fabes; Laura D Hanish; Janet Hyde; Lynn S Liben; Carol Lynn Martin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  The gender similarities hypothesis.

Authors:  Janet Shibley Hyde
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2005-09

3.  Diversity. Gender similarities in mathematics and science.

Authors:  Janet Shibley Hyde; Marcia C Linn
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  National differences in gender-science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement.

Authors:  Brian A Nosek; Frederick L Smyth; N Sriram; Nicole M Lindner; Thierry Devos; Alfonso Ayala; Yoav Bar-Anan; Robin Bergh; Huajian Cai; Karen Gonsalkorale; Selin Kesebir; Norbert Maliszewski; Félix Neto; Eero Olli; Jaihyun Park; Konrad Schnabel; Kimihiro Shiomura; Bogdan Tudor Tulbure; Reinout W Wiers; Mónika Somogyi; Nazar Akrami; Bo Ekehammar; Michelangelo Vianello; Mahzarin R Banaji; Anthony G Greenwald
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The development of children's beliefs about social and biological aspects of gender differences.

Authors:  M G Taylor
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1996-08

Review 6.  A developmental intergroup theory of social stereotypes and prejudice.

Authors:  Rebecca S Bigler; Lynn S Liben
Journal:  Adv Child Dev Behav       Date:  2006

7.  Self-efficacy beliefs as shapers of children's aspirations and career trajectories.

Authors:  A Bandura; C Barbaranelli; G V Caprara; C Pastorelli
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb

8.  The effects of single-sex compared with coeducational schooling on students' performance and attitudes: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Erin Pahlke; Janet Shibley Hyde; Carlie M Allison
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 17.737

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Students from single-sex schools are more gender-salient and more anxious in mixed-gender situations: Results from high school and college samples.

Authors:  Wang Ivy Wong; Sylvia Yun Shi; Zhansheng Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.