Literature DB >> 26190875

Multivariate Meta-Analysis of Heterogeneous Studies Using Only Summary Statistics: Efficiency and Robustness.

Dungang Liu1, Regina Liu2, Minge Xie2.   

Abstract

Meta-analysis has been widely used to synthesize evidence from multiple studies for common hypotheses or parameters of interest. However, it has not yet been fully developed for incorporating heterogeneous studies, which arise often in applications due to different study designs, populations or outcomes. For heterogeneous studies, the parameter of interest may not be estimable for certain studies, and in such a case, these studies are typically excluded from conventional meta-analysis. The exclusion of part of the studies can lead to a non-negligible loss of information. This paper introduces a metaanalysis for heterogeneous studies by combining the confidence density functions derived from the summary statistics of individual studies, hence referred to as the CD approach. It includes all the studies in the analysis and makes use of all information, direct as well as indirect. Under a general likelihood inference framework, this new approach is shown to have several desirable properties, including: i) it is asymptotically as efficient as the maximum likelihood approach using individual participant data (IPD) from all studies; ii) unlike the IPD analysis, it suffices to use summary statistics to carry out the CD approach. Individual-level data are not required; and iii) it is robust against misspecification of the working covariance structure of the parameter estimates. Besides its own theoretical significance, the last property also substantially broadens the applicability of the CD approach. All the properties of the CD approach are further confirmed by data simulated from a randomized clinical trials setting as well as by real data on aircraft landing performance. Overall, one obtains an unifying approach for combining summary statistics, subsuming many of the existing meta-analysis methods as special cases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  combining information; complex evidence synthesis; confidence distribution; efficiency; generalized estimating equations; heterogeneous studies; indirect evidence; individual participant data; multivariate meta-analysis

Year:  2015        PMID: 26190875      PMCID: PMC4504219          DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2014.899235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc        ISSN: 0162-1459            Impact factor:   5.033


  14 in total

1.  Combining summaries of binary outcomes with those of continuous outcomes in a meta-analysis.

Authors:  A Whitehead; A J Bailey; D Elbourne
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.051

2.  On the equivalence of meta-analysis using literature and using individual patient data.

Authors:  T Mathew; K Nordström
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  The highest confidence density region and its usage for joint inferences about constrained parameters.

Authors:  Lu Tian; Rui Wang; Tianxi Cai; Lee-Jen Wei
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Comparison of meta-analysis versus analysis of variance of individual patient data.

Authors:  I Olkin; A Sampson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Meta-analysis of clinical trial safety data in a drug development program: answers to frequently asked questions.

Authors:  Jesse A Berlin; Brenda J Crowe; Edward Whalen; H Amy Xia; Carol E Koro; Juergen Kuebler
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 2.486

6.  On the relative efficiency of using summary statistics versus individual-level data in meta-analysis.

Authors:  D Y Lin; D Zeng
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 2.445

Review 7.  Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group.

Authors:  D F Stroup; J A Berlin; S C Morton; I Olkin; G D Williamson; D Rennie; D Moher; B J Becker; T A Sipe; S B Thacker
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-04-19       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Testosterone and depression: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fahd Aziz Zarrouf; Steven Artz; James Griffith; Cristian Sirbu; Martin Kommor
Journal:  J Psychiatr Pract       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.325

9.  Efficacy of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and beta-blockers in the management of left ventricular systolic dysfunction according to race, gender, and diabetic status: a meta-analysis of major clinical trials.

Authors:  Paul G Shekelle; Michael W Rich; Sally C Morton; Col Sid W Atkinson; Wenli Tu; Margaret Maglione; Shannon Rhodes; Michael Barrett; Gregg C Fonarow; Barry Greenberg; Paul A Heidenreich; Tom Knabel; Marvin A Konstam; Anthony Steimle; Lynne Warner Stevenson
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2003-05-07       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Covariate heterogeneity in meta-analysis: criteria for deciding between meta-regression and individual patient data.

Authors:  M C Simmonds; J P T Higgins
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  12 in total

1.  Bayesian multivariate meta-analysis of multiple factors.

Authors:  Lifeng Lin; Haitao Chu
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 5.273

2.  Ensemble estimation and variable selection with semiparametric regression models.

Authors:  Sunyoung Shin; Yufeng Liu; Stephen R Cole; Jason P Fine
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.445

3.  Online updating method with new variables for big data streams.

Authors:  Chun Wang; Ming-Hui Chen; Jing Wu; Jun Yan; Yuping Zhang; Elizabeth Schifano
Journal:  Can J Stat       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 0.875

4.  Distributed Simultaneous Inference in Generalized Linear Models via Confidence Distribution.

Authors:  Lu Tang; Ling Zhou; Peter X-K Song
Journal:  J Multivar Anal       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 1.473

5.  A CD-based mapping method for combining multiple related parameters from heterogeneous intervention trials.

Authors:  Yang Jiao; Eun-Young Mun; Thomas A Trikalinos; Minge Xie
Journal:  Stat Interface       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 0.582

6.  Fused Lasso Approach in Regression Coefficients Clustering - Learning Parameter Heterogeneity in Data Integration.

Authors:  Lu Tang; Peter X K Song
Journal:  J Mach Learn Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 3.654

7.  Residuals and Diagnostics for Ordinal Regression Models: A Surrogate Approach.

Authors:  Dungang Liu; Heping Zhang
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 5.033

8.  A Distributed and Integrated Method of Moments for High-Dimensional Correlated Data Analysis.

Authors:  Emily C Hector; Peter X-K Song
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 5.033

9.  Enhanced empirical likelihood estimation of incubation period of COVID-19 by integrating published information.

Authors:  Zhongfeng Jiang; Baoying Yang; Jing Qin; Yong Zhou
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 2.497

10.  A distributional approach to obtain adjusted comparisons of proportions of a population at risk.

Authors:  Odile Sauzet; Jürgen Breckenkamp; Theda Borde; Silke Brenne; Matthias David; Oliver Razum; Janet L Peacock
Journal:  Emerg Themes Epidemiol       Date:  2016-06-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.