Lynn Leppla1,2, Sabina De Geest3, Katharina Fierz1, Barbara Deschler-Baier2, Antje Koller1,2. 1. Institute of Nursing Science, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, CH-4056, Basel, Switzerland. 2. Department of Oncology, Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center Freiburg, Hugstetterstrasse 55, Freiburg, 79106, Germany. 3. Institute of Nursing Science, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, CH-4056, Basel, Switzerland. Sabina.DeGeest@unibas.ch.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION:Oral mucositis (OM) is a common and debilitating side effect of chemoradiotherapy in patients awaiting allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT). PURPOSE: The aim of this pilot RCT was to compare an oral care self-management support protocol (OrCaSS) to usual pre-aHSCT care. Feasibility was tested, effect sizes calculated for OM (primary outcome), and patient adherence was measured (secondary outcome). METHODS:Eighteen AML patients awaiting aHSCT and hospitalized between August 2012 and April 2013 were randomized 1:1 to usual care (UCG) and intervention (IG) groups. The OrCaSS protocol consisted of two sessions of educational and behavioral interventions, the first delivered 1 week pre-admission (T1), the second on admission day (T2). Via field notes, practicability and acceptability were evaluated to explore the feasibility of intervention and study procedures. OM data were collected at T1, T2, and daily for 28 days using the WHO scale. The effect size r was calculated (r less than -0.1 ≙ small and greater than or equal to -0.3 ≙ medium). Patients' adherence to the protocol was assessed at T1, T2, and 8-10 days post-HSCT (T3). RESULTS: Research and intervention procedures were feasible. OM incidence was 100 %. The IG's median highest OM grade was 2.0 (IQR = 2); the UCGs was 3.0 (IQR = 2; r = -0.1). Median OM durations were 12 days in the IG and 14 days in the UCG (r = -0.1). OM onset was 2 days later in the IG than in the UCG (r = -0.1). Over the course of the study, patient adherence decreased in both groups. CONCLUSIONS:OrCaSS is a promising intervention to delay and reduce OM. These results can serve to plan a larger RCT.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION:Oral mucositis (OM) is a common and debilitating side effect of chemoradiotherapy in patients awaiting allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT). PURPOSE: The aim of this pilot RCT was to compare an oral care self-management support protocol (OrCaSS) to usual pre-aHSCT care. Feasibility was tested, effect sizes calculated for OM (primary outcome), and patient adherence was measured (secondary outcome). METHODS: Eighteen AMLpatients awaiting aHSCT and hospitalized between August 2012 and April 2013 were randomized 1:1 to usual care (UCG) and intervention (IG) groups. The OrCaSS protocol consisted of two sessions of educational and behavioral interventions, the first delivered 1 week pre-admission (T1), the second on admission day (T2). Via field notes, practicability and acceptability were evaluated to explore the feasibility of intervention and study procedures. OM data were collected at T1, T2, and daily for 28 days using the WHO scale. The effect size r was calculated (r less than -0.1 ≙ small and greater than or equal to -0.3 ≙ medium). Patients' adherence to the protocol was assessed at T1, T2, and 8-10 days post-HSCT (T3). RESULTS: Research and intervention procedures were feasible. OM incidence was 100 %. The IG's median highest OM grade was 2.0 (IQR = 2); the UCGs was 3.0 (IQR = 2; r = -0.1). Median OM durations were 12 days in the IG and 14 days in the UCG (r = -0.1). OM onset was 2 days later in the IG than in the UCG (r = -0.1). Over the course of the study, patient adherence decreased in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: OrCaSS is a promising intervention to delay and reduce OM. These results can serve to plan a larger RCT.
Entities:
Keywords:
Allogeneic stem cell transplantation; Oral care protocol; Oral mucositis
Authors: P J Stiff; H Erder; W I Bensinger; C Emmanouilides; T Gentile; J Isitt; Z J Lu; R Spielberger Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: Deborah B McGuire; Maria Elvira P Correa; Judith Johnson; Patricia Wienandts Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2006-04-25 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: K Yamagata; C Arai; H Sasaki; Y Takeuchi; K Onizawa; T Yanagawa; N Ishibashi; R Karube; K Shinozuka; Y Hasegawa; S Chiba; H Bukawa Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2011-08-29 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: Dorothy M Keefe; Mark M Schubert; Linda S Elting; Stephen T Sonis; Joel B Epstein; Judith E Raber-Durlacher; Cesar A Migliorati; Deborah B McGuire; Ronald D Hutchins; Douglas E Peterson Journal: Cancer Date: 2007-03-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Noor Al-Dasooqi; Stephen T Sonis; Joanne M Bowen; Emma Bateman; Nicole Blijlevens; Rachel J Gibson; Richard M Logan; Raj G Nair; Andrea M Stringer; Roger Yazbeck; Sharon Elad; Rajesh V Lalla Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2013-04-21 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Rajesh V Lalla; Joanne Bowen; Andrei Barasch; Linda Elting; Joel Epstein; Dorothy M Keefe; Deborah B McGuire; Cesar Migliorati; Ourania Nicolatou-Galitis; Douglas E Peterson; Judith E Raber-Durlacher; Stephen T Sonis; Sharon Elad Journal: Cancer Date: 2014-02-25 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Catherine H L Hong; Luiz Alcino Gueiros; Janet S Fulton; Karis Kin Fong Cheng; Abhishek Kandwal; Dimitra Galiti; Jane M Fall-Dickson; Jorgen Johansen; Suzanne Ameringer; Tomoko Kataoka; Dianna Weikel; June Eilers; Vinasha Ranna; Anusha Vaddi; Rajesh V Lalla; Paolo Bossi; Sharon Elad Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-07-08 Impact factor: 3.603