PURPOSE: Oral mucositis is a serious problem that affects a significant number of hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) patients. There are many gaps in management, and evidence-based guidelines do not provide consistent recommendations. The purpose of this pilot study was to develop a mucositis oral care protocol for the prevention and management of mucositis in the HCT patient and to evaluate the clinical impact of its implementation. METHODS: After receipt of Institutional Review Board approval, all patients admitted to the Hematology-Oncology service for high-dose chemotherapy followed by an autologous or allogeneic HCT were eligible for the study. As part of a change in practice, a new mucositis protocol consisting of a specific oral care regimen was instituted for prevention and treatment of mucositis. Assessment of mucositis began upon admission to the hospital and the patient was evaluated using a mucositis grading scale on a daily basis by the physician and nursing staff. The new mucositis protocol was a part of the HCT service admission orders for each patient. The group of patients treated according to the new mucositis protocol were compared with a retrospective control group consisting of patients who had undergone management of oral mucositis under the previous standard of care. The primary endpoints were to evaluate incidence, severity, and duration of oral mucositis. Secondary endpoints included days requiring narcotics; days of parenteral nutrition, febrile neutropenia, antimicrobial therapy, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: There were 13 patients enrolled in the control group and 12 patients in the new protocol group. The new protocol resulted in a decreased incidence (100% vs. 75%) and duration (19.2 vs. 8.3 days) of mucositis. Days of maximum grade one and three mucositis were decreased by 56%, and 70%, respectively. Days of maximum grade two mucositis, however increased by 22%. The days of narcotic use were reduced by 19% in the new protocol group (15.8 vs. 12.8 days). All patients in the new protocol group required parenteral nutrition, but days of use were reduced by 41% (17 vs. 10.2 days). The incidence of infection measured by days of febrile neutropenia and antimicrobial therapy were reduced by 35% (10.2 vs. 6.5 days) and 33% (17 vs. 11.4 days). Finally, the overall length of hospital stay was reduced by 7 days (30 vs. 23 days). CONCLUSION: Implementation of a standardized oral care protocol for mucositis management resulted in a decreased incidence, duration and severity of mucositis, and also reduced the global negative impact of mucositis. Future studies may further evaluate the global impact by adjusting for confounding factors.
PURPOSE:Oral mucositis is a serious problem that affects a significant number of hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) patients. There are many gaps in management, and evidence-based guidelines do not provide consistent recommendations. The purpose of this pilot study was to develop a mucositis oral care protocol for the prevention and management of mucositis in the HCT patient and to evaluate the clinical impact of its implementation. METHODS: After receipt of Institutional Review Board approval, all patients admitted to the Hematology-Oncology service for high-dose chemotherapy followed by an autologous or allogeneic HCT were eligible for the study. As part of a change in practice, a new mucositis protocol consisting of a specific oral care regimen was instituted for prevention and treatment of mucositis. Assessment of mucositis began upon admission to the hospital and the patient was evaluated using a mucositis grading scale on a daily basis by the physician and nursing staff. The new mucositis protocol was a part of the HCT service admission orders for each patient. The group of patients treated according to the new mucositis protocol were compared with a retrospective control group consisting of patients who had undergone management of oral mucositis under the previous standard of care. The primary endpoints were to evaluate incidence, severity, and duration of oral mucositis. Secondary endpoints included days requiring narcotics; days of parenteral nutrition, febrile neutropenia, antimicrobial therapy, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: There were 13 patients enrolled in the control group and 12 patients in the new protocol group. The new protocol resulted in a decreased incidence (100% vs. 75%) and duration (19.2 vs. 8.3 days) of mucositis. Days of maximum grade one and three mucositis were decreased by 56%, and 70%, respectively. Days of maximum grade two mucositis, however increased by 22%. The days of narcotic use were reduced by 19% in the new protocol group (15.8 vs. 12.8 days). All patients in the new protocol group required parenteral nutrition, but days of use were reduced by 41% (17 vs. 10.2 days). The incidence of infection measured by days of febrile neutropenia and antimicrobial therapy were reduced by 35% (10.2 vs. 6.5 days) and 33% (17 vs. 11.4 days). Finally, the overall length of hospital stay was reduced by 7 days (30 vs. 23 days). CONCLUSION: Implementation of a standardized oral care protocol for mucositis management resulted in a decreased incidence, duration and severity of mucositis, and also reduced the global negative impact of mucositis. Future studies may further evaluate the global impact by adjusting for confounding factors.
Authors: Deborah B McGuire; Janet S Fulton; Jumin Park; Carlton G Brown; M Elvira P Correa; June Eilers; Sharon Elad; Faith Gibson; Loree K Oberle-Edwards; Joanne Bowen; Rajesh V Lalla Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2013-09-10 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Catherine H L Hong; Luiz Alcino Gueiros; Janet S Fulton; Karis Kin Fong Cheng; Abhishek Kandwal; Dimitra Galiti; Jane M Fall-Dickson; Jorgen Johansen; Suzanne Ameringer; Tomoko Kataoka; Dianna Weikel; June Eilers; Vinasha Ranna; Anusha Vaddi; Rajesh V Lalla; Paolo Bossi; Sharon Elad Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-07-08 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Douglas E Peterson; Kerstin Ohrn; Joanne Bowen; Monica Fliedner; Judith Lees; Charles Loprinzi; Takehiko Mori; Anthony Osaguona; Dianna S Weikel; Sharon Elad; Rajesh V Lalla Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2012-09-21 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Lynn Leppla; Sabina De Geest; Katharina Fierz; Barbara Deschler-Baier; Antje Koller Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2015-07-21 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Akram F Qutob; Gabrielle Allen; Sumant Gue; Tamas Revesz; Richard M Logan; Dorothy Keefe Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2012-10-26 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Seung Han Kim; Hoon Jai Chun; Hyuk Soon Choi; Eun Sun Kim; Bora Keum; Yeon Seok Seo; Yoon Tae Jeen; Hong Sik Lee; Soon Ho Um; Chang Duck Kim Journal: Oncol Lett Date: 2018-06-04 Impact factor: 2.967
Authors: M Elvira P Correa; Karis Kin Fong Cheng; Karen Chiang; Abhishek Kandwal; Charles L Loprinzi; Takehiko Mori; Carin Potting; Tanya Rouleau; Juan J Toro; Vinisha Ranna; Anusha Vaddi; Douglas E Peterson; Paolo Bossi; Rajesh V Lalla; Sharon Elad Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-12-14 Impact factor: 3.603