Literature DB >> 26189808

Comparing surgical repair with conservative treatment for degenerative rotator cuff tears: a randomized controlled trial.

Frederik O Lambers Heerspink1, Jos J A M van Raay2, Rinco C T Koorevaar3, Pepijn J M van Eerden4, Robin E Westerbeek5, Esther van 't Riet3, Inge van den Akker-Scheek6, Ronald L Diercks6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Good clinical results have been reported for both surgical and conservative treatment of rotator cuff tears. The primary aim of this randomized controlled trial was to compare functional and radiologic improvement after surgical and conservative treatment of degenerative rotator cuff tears.
METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial that included 56 patients with a degenerative full-thickness rotator cuff tear between January 2009 and December 2012; 31 patients were treated conservatively, and rotator cuff repair was performed in 25 patients. Outcome measures, including the Constant-Murley score (CMS), visual analog scale (VAS) pain and VAS disability scores, were assessed preoperatively and after 6 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed preoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: At 12 months postoperatively, the mean CMS was 81.9 (standard deviation [SD], 15.6) in the surgery group vs 73.7 (SD, 18.4) in the conservative group (P = .08). VAS pain (P = .04) and VAS disability (P = .02) were significantly lower in the surgery group at the 12-month follow-up. A subgroup analysis showed postoperative CMS results were significantly better in surgically treated patients without a retear compared with conservatively treated patients (88.5 [SD, 6.2] vs 73.7 [SD, 18.4]).
CONCLUSION: In our population of patients with degenerative rotator cuff tears who were randomly treated by surgery or conservative protocol, we did not observe differences in functional outcome as measured with the CMS 1 year after treatment. However, significant differences in pain and disabilities were observed in favor of surgical treatment. The best outcomes in function and pain were seen in patients with an intact rotator cuff postoperatively.
Copyright © 2015 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; Rotator cuff; conservative treatment; cuff integrity; randomized controlled trial; rotator cuff repair

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26189808     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.05.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  44 in total

1.  Functional treatment in rotator cuff tears: is it safe and effective? A retrospective comparison with surgical treatment.

Authors:  Angelo De Carli; Mattia Fabbri; Riccardo Maria Lanzetti; Alessandro Ciompi; Edoardo Gaj; Gioia Beccarini; Mario Vetrano; Andrea Ferretti
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2017-05-10

2.  High prevalence of rotator cuff tears in a population who never sought for shoulder problems: a clinical, ultrasonographic and radiographic screening study.

Authors:  Shwan Khoschnau; Jugoslav Milosavjevic; Bo Sahlstedt; Rebecca Rylance; Hans Rahme; Bakir Kadum
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-11-07

3.  Surgery for shoulder impingement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials.

Authors:  Moin Khan; Bashar Alolabi; Nolan Horner; Asheesh Bedi; Olufemi R Ayeni; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2019-03-07

Review 4.  Further Research Is Needed to Define the Benefits of Non-operative Rotator Cuff Treatment.

Authors:  Cynthia A Kahlenberg; David M Dare; Joshua S Dines
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2016-02-29

Review 5.  Degenerative rotator cuff tear, repair or not repair? A review of current evidence.

Authors:  A A Narvani; M A Imam; A Godenèche; E Calvo; S Corbett; A L Wallace; E Itoi
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Comparative Effectiveness of Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment for Rotator Cuff Tears: A Propensity Score Analysis From the ROW Cohort.

Authors:  Nitin B Jain; Gregory D Ayers; Run Fan; John E Kuhn; Jon J P Warner; Keith M Baumgarten; Elizabeth Matzkin; Laurence D Higgins
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Are Psychosocial Factors Associated With Patient-reported Outcome Measures in Patients With Rotator Cuff Tears? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Rogelio A Coronado; Amee L Seitz; Erica Pelote; Kristin R Archer; Nitin B Jain
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  Natural History of Degenerative Rotator Cuff Tears.

Authors:  Jason L Codding; Jay D Keener
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-03

Review 9.  Degenerative Rotator Cuff Tears: Refining Surgical Indications Based on Natural History Data.

Authors:  Jay D Keener; Brendan M Patterson; Nathan Orvets; Aaron M Chamberlain
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.020

10.  EXERCISE THERAPY IN THE NON-OPERATIVE TREATMENT OF FULL-THICKNESS ROTATOR CUFF TEARS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.

Authors:  Michael Jeanfavre; Sean Husted; Gretchen Leff
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2018-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.