Literature DB >> 26188331

Evidence and importance of genetic exchange among field populations of Trypanosoma cruzi.

Louisa A Messenger1, Michael A Miles2.   

Abstract

Many eukaryotic pathogenic microorganisms that were previously assumed to propagate clonally have retained cryptic sexual cycles. The principal reproductive mode of Trypanosoma cruzi, the aetiological agent of Chagas disease, remains a controversial topic. Despite the existence of two recent natural hybrid lineages, a pervasive view is that recombination has been restrained at an evolutionary scale and is of little epidemiological relevance to contemporary parasite populations. This article reviews the growing number of field studies which indicate that natural hybridization in T. cruzi may be frequent, non-obligatory and idiosyncratic; potentially involving independent exchange of kinetoplast and nuclear genetic material as well as canonical meiotic mechanisms. Together these observations now challenge the traditional paradigm of preponderate clonal evolution in T. cruzi and highlight the need for additional, intensive and appropriately sampled field surveys, complemented by high resolution, combined nuclear and mitochondrial population genetics analyses.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chagas disease; Clonality; Cryptic sexuality; Genetic exchange; Mitochondrial introgression; Recombination; Trypanosoma cruzi

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26188331      PMCID: PMC4644990          DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2015.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Trop        ISSN: 0001-706X            Impact factor:   3.112


Introduction

The principal reproductive mode of a number of parasitic protozoan species is the subject of an enduring debate (Smith et al., 1993, Tibayrenc et al., 1986, Tibayrenc et al., 1990, Tibayrenc and Ayala, 1991, Tibayrenc and Ayala, 2012, Tibayrenc and Ayala, 2013, Tibayrenc and Ayala, 2014a, Tibayrenc and Ayala, 2014b, Ramírez and Llewellyn, 2014, Tomasini et al., 2014a, Tomasini et al., 2014b). At the two extremes are the preponderate clonal evolution (PCE) model, which suggests that genetic exchange is too infrequent to break the predominant pattern of clonality, such that only ‘restrained recombination’ occurs at an evolutionary scale (Tibayrenc and Ayala, 2012, Tibayrenc and Ayala, 2013, Tibayrenc and Ayala, 2014a, Tibayrenc and Ayala, 2014b), and the counter-proposition that hybridization is in fact pervasive, albeit challenging to detect, among some natural disease foci (Ramírez and Llewellyn, 2014). Trypanosoma cruzi, the aetiological agent of Chagas disease, often fulfils some key assumptions of PCE, which have been cited as compelling evidence that it is essentially a clonal organism, namely strong linkage disequilibrium, deviations from Hardy–Weinberg allele frequencies and structuring of populations into stable, distinct genetic clades, or discrete typing units (DTUs) (Tibayrenc and Ayala, 2012, Tibayrenc and Ayala, 2013). T. cruzi isolates display remarkable genetic diversity, which is widely believed to contribute to the considerable biological, epidemiological and clinical variation observed among Chagas disease foci (Miles et al., 2009). Current international consensus recognizes a minimum of six genetic lineages or DTUs (TcI–TcVI), with distributions loosely defined by geography, ecology and transmission cycle (Zingales et al., 2009). Genotyping using an array of markers indicate DTUs TcI–TcIV form monophyletic clades and TcV and TcVI are recent, natural inter-lineage hybrids of TcII and TcIII (Machado and Ayala, 2001, Brisse et al., 2003, Lewis et al., 2011, Yeo et al., 2011). Molecular dating indicates that these hybrid lineages evolved recently, within the last 60,000 years (Lewis et al., 2011), possibly from human disruption of sylvatic transmission cycles in the Southern Cone of South America, suggesting there may still be a risk of genetic exchange driving the emergence of novel recombinants (Flores-López and Machado, 2011, Lewis et al., 2011). These hybrid DTUs circulate almost exclusively in domestic transmission cycles and are sympatric with severe clinical sequelae in southern endemic areas. However, the frequency of recombination occurring among natural T. cruzi populations, the precise cytological mechanisms underlying genetic exchange events and the effect of hybridization on parasite phenotype remain largely undefined. A clear understanding of the impact of genetic exchange on the ecological and geographical distributions and clinical characteristics of T. cruzi strains is crucial to establish the epidemiological risk associated with recombinant genotypes and to reconcile the implications parasite hybridization has at both the generational and evolutionary scales. However, detecting genetic exchange among natural populations is inherently complicated by choice of samples and marker resolution, given that strains most likely to be recombining may be closely related and potentially indistinguishable.

Genetic exchange among T. cruzi field populations

With improved sampling strategies and the development of higher resolution nuclear and mitochondrial genotyping techniques (Llewellyn et al., 2009, Messenger et al., 2012, Messenger et al., 2015, Ramírez et al., 2012), a growing number of field studies now indicate that natural recombination in T. cruzi may be frequent, non-obligatory and idiosyncratic; potentially involving independent exchange of kinetoplast and nuclear genetic material as well as canonical meiotic mechanisms (Table 1).
Table 1

Summary of field evidence of genetic exchange in T. cruzi.

T. cruzi population(s)Transmission cycle, locationType of genetic exchangeGenetic markers examinedEvidence of genetic exchangePutative mechanismReference
TcIArboreal sylvatic, BoliviaIntra-lineageMLMT- Mitochondrial introgression with no detectable nuclear involvementAsymmetric mitochondrial introgressionMessenger et al. (2015)
mtMLST- Dissimilar heterozygosity estimates
TcIBoliviaInter-lineageGPIa- Mitochondrial introgression between TcI and TcIII/IV/V/VI with no detectable nuclear involvement- Asymmetric mitochondrial introgressionBarnabé and Breniere (2012)
ND1b
TcIBoliviaIntra-lineageMLMT- H-W allele frequencies- MeioticBarnabé et al. (2013)
- Linkage equilibrium between loci
- Lack of repeated MLGs
TcIArboreal sylvatic, BrazilIntra-lineageMLEE- Putative homozygous parents and heterozygous progeny- MeioticCarrasco et al. (1996)
RAPD- H–W phenotype frequencies
TcIIDomestic, BrazilIntra-lineageMLMT- H–W allele frequencies among local populations- MeioticBaptista et al. (2014)
ND4b, ND7b- Linkage equilibrium between loci- Asymmetric mitochondrial inheritance
- Independent inheritance of mitochondrial and nuclear genes
TcIDomestic, peridomestic, sylvatic, ColombiaIntra-lineageMLMT- Mitochondrial introgression with no detectable nuclear involvement-Asymmetric mitochondrial introgressionRamírez et al. (2012)
mtMLST- Recombinant mitochondrial genotype- Biparental mitochondrial inheritance
TcIDomestic, peridomestic, sylvatic, ColombiaIntra-lineagenMLST- Linkage equilibrium between loci- MeioticRamírez et al. (2013)
- Putative recombination breakpoints
TcIDomestic, EcuadorIntra-lineageMLMT- H–W allele frequencies- MeioticOcaña-Mayorga et al. (2010)
- Linkage equilibrium between loci
- Lack of repeated MLGs
TcI and TcIII/IVNorth America, Brazil, BoliviaInter-lineageGPIa- Mitochondrial introgression between TcIII and TcIV with no detectable nuclear involvement- Asymmetric mitochondrial introgressionLewis et al. (2011)
COII-ND1b
MLMT
TcI and TcIII/IVNorth America, Venezuela, Argentina, Bolivia and BrazilInter- and intra-lineageMLMT- Mitochondrial introgression between TcI and TcIII/IV- Asymmetric mitochondrial introgressionMessenger et al. (2012)
mtMLST- Intra-TcI mitochondrial introgression
- No detectable nuclear involvement
TcI and TcIVNorth AmericaInter-lineage24Sα rRNAa, 18S rRNAa, TcMSH2a, Tc55a, DHFR-TSa, COII-ND1b- Mitochondrial introgression between TcI and TcIV- Asymmetric mitochondrial introgressionRoellig et al. (2013)

H–W: Hardy–Weinberg; MLEE: multilocus enzyme electrophoresis; MLG: multilocus genotype; MLMT: multilocus microsatellite typing; mtMLST: maxicircle multilocus sequence typing; nMLST: nuclear multilocus sequence typing; RAPD: random amplification of polymorphic DNA.

Nuclear gene.

Mitochondrial gene.

At the inter-lineage level, DTUs TcV and TcVI are unequivocal hybrids, which resemble diploid, heterozygous Mendelian F1 progeny, sharing intact alleles from their parental progenitors (TcII and TcIII) (Machado and Ayala, 2001, Brisse et al., 2003, Barnabé et al., 2011, Lewis et al., 2009, Lewis et al., 2011, Yeo et al., 2011). The origin(s) of these hybrid DTUs is presently unresolved; it is unclear whether they arose from two independent genetic exchange events (De Freitas et al., 2006, Lewis et al., 2011) or a single incidence of hybridization followed by clonal divergence (Westenberger et al., 2005, Sturm and Campbell, 2010, Flores-López and Machado, 2011). The status of TcIII and TcIV as ancient recombinants of TcI and TcII (Westenberger et al., 2005), or sister groups of TcI (Tomasini and Diosque, 2015), is more contentious, and varies based on the array of nuclear loci (Westenberger et al., 2005, Tomasini and Diosque, 2015) or mitochondrial haplotypes examined (Lewis et al., 2011, Messenger et al., 2012). The evidence for any contemporary recombination between major DTUs is more limited and the genetic identity of each lineage appears largely preserved. However, it is not known to what extent this is maintained by genetic reproductive barriers between DTUs or ecological isolation, considering, for example, historical parents TcII and TcIII now circulate in almost completely separate transmission cycles. At the intra-lineage level, genetic exchange is increasingly reported, particularly among TcI populations. It is unclear whether this is due to the examination of representatives from intensely sampled populations that are minimally-subdivided spatially and temporally, and therefore more likely to undergo hybridization, or if it truly reflects the analysis of strains that are more permissive to recombination (Prugnolle and De Meeus, 2010, Ramírez and Llewellyn, 2014). The underlying cytological mechanisms of natural intra-TcI recombination vary between studies and genetic markers used (Table 1 and Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Putative cytological mechanisms and patterns of allele inheritance observed among natural field populations of T. cruzi (A and B) and during in vitro genetic exchange experiments (C).

In general, genetic exchange at the nuclear level has been demonstrated by Hardy–Weinberg allele frequencies, linkage equilibrium between loci, a lack of repeated multilocus genotypes (MLGs) (Barnabé et al., 2013, Baptista et al., 2014, Ocaña-Mayorga et al., 2010, Ramírez et al., 2013) and more rarely, excess heterozygosity (Messenger et al., 2015), all consistent with meiotic allele inheritance. In those studies that also examine kinetoplast DNA, mitochondrial introgression, evidenced by phylogenetic incongruence between nuclear and mitochondrial loci, is emerging as a common feature of natural transmission cycles especially within TcI populations (Lima et al., 2014, Messenger et al., 2012, Messenger et al., 2015, Ramírez et al., 2012, Zumaya-Estrada et al., 2012) but also historically, between major lineages (Lewis et al., 2011, Messenger et al., 2012, Barnabé and Breniere, 2012, Roellig et al., 2013) (Table 1 and Fig. 1). One explanation, given their crucial role in growth, development and metabolism, is that asymmetric mitochondrial introgression, may satisfy the elevated necessity to escape Muller's ratchet (the irreversible accumulation of deleterious mutations resulting from clonal reproduction) compared to the nuclear genome (Messenger et al., 2015, Neiman and Taylor, 2009, Ramírez and Llewellyn, 2014); others have attributed these observations to gross differences in evolutionary pressures and molecular clocks between non-coding microsatellites and coding maxicircle genes (Tibayrenc and Ayala, 2013). However, it is highly improbable that mutation rate variation could account for the observation of nearly identical nuclear genotypes with radically divergent mitochondrial genomes, particularly when putative donors and recipients are identified within the same population (Messenger et al., 2012, Ramírez et al., 2012). Reciprocal nuclear recombination among parasite strains undergoing mitochondrial introgression has yet to be explicitly detected, which may support an asymmetric, cryptic hybridization mechanism, or perhaps more likely, reflect the minor amount of nuclear genetic information sampled (20% of the mitochondrial genome vs. <0.1% of the nuclear genome); without whole nuclear genome sequences for introgression hybrids and parental isolates, it is impossible to distinguish between these two hypotheses. However, by analogy to other medically important trypanosome species, the presence of alternate, covert sexual mechanisms within the same species is not entirely unexpected (Rougeron et al., 2009, Rougeron et al., 2011, Duffy et al., 2013, Hickman et al., 2013, Rogers et al., 2014, Ramírez and Llewellyn, 2014). Interestingly, a recent study from Colombia identified biparental mitochondrial inheritance as a putative consequence of genetic exchange events (Ramírez et al., 2012). A mosaic maxicircle sequence was detected in a human TcI isolate and the presence of a recombination breakpoint confirmed by allele-specific PCR. Such a sequence is expected to arise following inter-molecular maxicircle recombination, which necessitates the inheritance of mixed mitochondrial complements. Uniparental inheritance of highly heteroplasmic maxicircles might present an indistinguishable scenario (if strains were characterized using basic dye-terminator sequencing) but reported mitochondrial heteroplasmy in T. cruzi, (examined using high coverage Illumina sequencing reads), is thus far low (Messenger et al., 2012). Parallel observations from experimental crosses of Trypanosoma brucei brucei (Gibson and Garside, 1990, Gibson et al., 2008), suggest that biparental mitochondrial inheritance might be a fundamental, as yet, uncharacterized, biological phenomenon in trypanosomatids.

Reconciling mechanisms of T. cruzi recombination in vitro and among natural populations

The generation of intra-TcI hybrids in vitro demonstrates that at least some T. cruzi strains have an extant capacity for genetic exchange (Gaunt et al., 2003). Putative parental isolates identified by Carrasco et al. (1996) were transformed with episomal recombinant plasmids containing either hygromycin B or neomycin resistance genes and co-passaged through in vitro (mammalian cell cultures) and in vivo (mice and triatomine bugs) cycles (Gaunt et al., 2003). Isolation of six clones by double drug selection from in vitro axenic cultures, and subsequent genetic characterization by MLEE, karyotyping, microsatellite genotyping and nucleotide sequencing of housekeeping genes, indicated that these intra-lineage recombinants inherited all parental alleles at most loci and one parental maxicircle genotype (Gaunt et al., 2003). By analogy with Candida albicans (Bennett and Johnson, 2003, Forche et al., 2008), it was proposed that nuclear fusion had created a tetraploid intermediate, followed by homologous recombination, gradual genome erosion and reversion to aneuploidy (Fig. 1). FACs analysis of hybrid isolates reported a stable DNA content, on average, ∼69% higher than parental strains (Lewis et al., 2009); natural T. cruzi isolates are minimally diploid but overall genome size can vary by up to 48% between different DTUs (Lewis et al., 2009). Subsequent prolonged maintenance of the experimental hybrids in axenic cultures demonstrated a gradual, progressive decline in DNA content, with no evidence of any true meiotic reductive division; to date these strains remain sub-tetraploid (Lewis et al., 2010). While this parasexual mechanism of genetic exchange has a precedent in fungal species, it is challenging to reconcile with both the predominant patterns of allele inheritance observed among natural T. cruzi populations (Table 1 and Fig. 1) as well as the conservation of meiosis-specific orthologues within the T. cruzi genome (Ramesh et al., 2005). A similar paradox exists in T. b. brucei where canonical meiotic recombination (Peacock et al., 2011), including the formation of haploid life cycle stages (Peacock et al., 2014), has been explicitly described, but is not the exclusive or obligate reproductive mechanism reported from transmission cycles (Balmer et al., 2011, Duffy et al., 2013). Likewise, experimental hybridization in Leishmania resembles meiosis with recurrent triploidy (Akopyants et al., 2009, Inbar et al., 2013), but inbreeding also appears frequent in nature (Calvo-Álvarez et al., 2014, Rougeron et al., 2009, Rougeron et al., 2011, Sterkers et al., 2011, Sterkers et al., 2014, Rogers et al., 2014).

Problems of detecting recombination among field populations

It is clear that to detect natural recombination, sample strategy, population allocation and marker choice are crucial for study design. Grouping of divergent non-recombining subgroups (in the case of T. cruzi, major DTUs) can inflate genetic linkage statistics and mask recombination events occurring between more closely related individuals (Smith et al., 1993). Recent observations of the Wahlund effect obscuring Hardy–Weinberg allele frequencies and linkage equilibrium within Brazilian TcII strains, caution the interpretation of statistics derived from inappropriately assigned parasite populations (Baptista et al., 2014). The use of multiple, different types of molecular markers (nuclear and mitochondrial, coding and non-coding) are required, in combination with targeted investigation of potential ‘hybridization’ zones, i.e. areas where recently diverged, genetically distinguishable subpopulations regularly interact (Messenger et al., 2015, Ramírez and Llewellyn, 2014). The value of such high-density sampling has already been demonstrated in defining the population structures of other trypanosomatid species, e.g. Trypanosoma brucei gambiense (Koffi et al., 2009), Trypanosoma congolense (Morrison et al., 2009), Leishmania braziliensis (Rougeron et al., 2009) and Leishmania guyanensis (Rougeron et al., 2011), including establishing putative levels of genetic exchange. However, the low circulating parasitaemia that defines chronic Chagas disease patients often prohibits parasite isolation, and thus many studies are overly reliant on historical collections of references isolates assembled over many years.

Implications of hybridization for parasite phenotype

Importantly, the effects of genetic exchange on T. cruzi phenotype are unknown. Hybrid vigour (heterosis) is a well-documented phenomenon among parasitic protozoa (Detwiler and Criscione, 2010). Observations of natural Leishmania hybrids indicate that genetic exchange can impact vector permissibility (Volf et al., 2007), increase (Akopyants et al., 2009) or alter (Cortes et al., 2012, Calvo-Álvarez et al., 2014) virulence, including the ability to disseminate and colonize visceral organs (Romano et al., 2014), as well as generate recombinant progeny that are capable of widespread clonal propagation (Schwenkenbecher et al., 2006, Nolder et al., 2007); a scenario reminiscent of the successful establishment of TcV and TcVI among domestic transmission cycles in the Southern Cone. Similarly, if mitochondrial introgression is exploitable as a putative mechanism of host range extension, hybrids might be expected to present higher mammalian infectivity and growth rates, especially in vectors (Messenger et al., 2015). The pathological implications of recombinant genotypes in human infections with regards to virulence, transmissibility and drug susceptibility warrant further investigation in conjunction with improved methods of identification and isolation of natural hybrids strains.

Conclusions

The majority of field studies now indicate that natural genetic exchange in T. cruzi is both contemporary and historical, responsible for shaping current parasite population structures, as well as the evolution of distinct T. cruzi DTUs. Together these observations challenge the traditional paradigm of PCE in T. cruzi and highlight the need for additional, intensive and appropriately sampled field surveys, complemented by high resolution, combined nuclear and mitochondrial population genetics analyses. The precedent in experimental design established by such studies may represent the most promising intermediary in T. cruzi population genetics until imminently superseded by comparative population genomics.
  66 in total

1.  Microsatellite analysis reveals genetic structure of Leishmania tropica.

Authors:  Jan M Schwenkenbecher; Thierry Wirth; Lionel F Schnur; Charles L Jaffe; Henk Schallig; Amer Al-Jawabreh; Omar Hamarsheh; Kifaya Azmi; Francine Pratlong; Gabriele Schönian
Journal:  Int J Parasitol       Date:  2005-10-14       Impact factor: 3.981

2.  Scarce events of mitochondrial introgression in Trypanosoma cruzi: new case with a Bolivian strain.

Authors:  Christian Barnabé; Simone Frédérique Brenière
Journal:  Infect Genet Evol       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 3.342

3.  Identification of the meiotic life cycle stage of Trypanosoma brucei in the tsetse fly.

Authors:  Lori Peacock; Vanessa Ferris; Reuben Sharma; Jack Sunter; Mick Bailey; Mark Carrington; Wendy Gibson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Evidence of substantial recombination among Trypanosoma cruzi II strains from Minas Gerais.

Authors:  Rodrigo de Paula Baptista; Daniella Alchaar D'Ávila; Marcela Segatto; Ítalo Faria do Valle; Glória Regina Franco; Helder Magno Silva Valadares; Eliane Dias Gontijo; Lúcia Maria da Cunha Galvão; Sérgio Danilo Junho Pena; Egler Chiari; Carlos Renato Machado; Andréa Mara Macedo
Journal:  Infect Genet Evol       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 3.342

5.  Sex, subdivision, and domestic dispersal of Trypanosoma cruzi lineage I in southern Ecuador.

Authors:  Sofía Ocaña-Mayorga; Martin S Llewellyn; Jaime A Costales; Michael A Miles; Mario J Grijalva
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2010-12-14

6.  Ecological host fitting of Trypanosoma cruzi TcI in Bolivia: mosaic population structure, hybridization and a role for humans in Andean parasite dispersal.

Authors:  Louisa A Messenger; Lineth Garcia; Mathieu Vanhove; Carlos Huaranca; Marinely Bustamante; Marycruz Torrico; Faustino Torrico; Michael A Miles; Martin S Llewellyn
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 6.185

7.  Genome-scale multilocus microsatellite typing of Trypanosoma cruzi discrete typing unit I reveals phylogeographic structure and specific genotypes linked to human infection.

Authors:  Martin S Llewellyn; Michael A Miles; Hernan J Carrasco; Michael D Lewis; Matthew Yeo; Jorge Vargas; Faustino Torrico; Patricio Diosque; Vera Valente; Sebastiao A Valente; Michael W Gaunt
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 6.823

8.  The 'obligate diploid' Candida albicans forms mating-competent haploids.

Authors:  Meleah A Hickman; Guisheng Zeng; Anja Forche; Matthew P Hirakawa; Darren Abbey; Benjamin D Harrison; Yan-Ming Wang; Ching-hua Su; Richard J Bennett; Yue Wang; Judith Berman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Discovery of mating in the major African livestock pathogen Trypanosoma congolense.

Authors:  Liam J Morrison; Alison Tweedie; Alana Black; Gina L Pinchbeck; Robert M Christley; Andreas Schoenefeld; Christiane Hertz-Fowler; Annette MacLeod; C Michael R Turner; Andy Tait
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  How often do they have sex? A comparative analysis of the population structure of seven eukaryotic microbial pathogens.

Authors:  Nicolás Tomasini; Juan José Lauthier; Francisco José Ayala; Michel Tibayrenc; Patricio Diosque
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  33 in total

Review 1.  Chagas Disease in the United States: a Public Health Approach.

Authors:  Caryn Bern; Louisa A Messenger; Jeffrey D Whitman; James H Maguire
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 2.  Chagas Disease Diagnostic Applications: Present Knowledge and Future Steps.

Authors:  V Balouz; F Agüero; C A Buscaglia
Journal:  Adv Parasitol       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 3.870

Review 3.  Prediction and Prevention of Parasitic Diseases Using a Landscape Genomics Framework.

Authors:  Philipp Schwabl; Martin S Llewellyn; Erin L Landguth; Björn Andersson; Uriel Kitron; Jaime A Costales; Sofía Ocaña; Mario J Grijalva
Journal:  Trends Parasitol       Date:  2016-11-16

4.  Genetic polymorphism of Trypanosoma cruzi bloodstream populations in adult chronic indeterminate Chagas disease patients from the E1224 clinical trial.

Authors:  Juan Carlos Ramírez; Gonzalo Raúl Acevedo; Carolina Torres; Rudy Parrado; Anabelle De La Barra; Sandro Villarroel; Lineth García; Joaquim Gascon; Lourdes Ortiz; Faustino Torrico; Isabela Ribeiro; Alejandro Gabriel Schijman
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 5.790

5.  Repeat-Driven Generation of Antigenic Diversity in a Major Human Pathogen, Trypanosoma cruzi.

Authors:  Carlos Talavera-López; Louisa A Messenger; Michael D Lewis; Matthew Yeo; João Luís Reis-Cunha; Gabriel Machado Matos; Daniella C Bartholomeu; José E Calzada; Azael Saldaña; Juan David Ramírez; Felipe Guhl; Sofía Ocaña-Mayorga; Jaime A Costales; Rodion Gorchakov; Kathryn Jones; Melissa S Nolan; Santuza M R Teixeira; Hernán José Carrasco; Maria Elena Bottazzi; Peter J Hotez; Kristy O Murray; Mario J Grijalva; Barbara Burleigh; Edmundo C Grisard; Michael A Miles; Björn Andersson
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 5.293

6.  New insights into Trypanosoma cruzi evolution, genotyping and molecular diagnostics from satellite DNA sequence analysis.

Authors:  Juan C Ramírez; Carolina Torres; María de Los A Curto; Alejandro G Schijman
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2017-12-18

Review 7.  Reproduction in Trypanosomatids: Past and Present.

Authors:  Camino Gutiérrez-Corbo; Bárbara Domínguez-Asenjo; María Martínez-Valladares; Yolanda Pérez-Pertejo; Carlos García-Estrada; Rafael Balaña-Fouce; Rosa M Reguera
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-27

8.  Importation of Hybrid Human-Associated Trypanosoma cruzi Strains of Southern South American Origin, Colombia.

Authors:  Louisa A Messenger; Juan David Ramirez; Martin S Llewellyn; Felipe Guhl; Michael A Miles
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 6.883

Review 9.  Over Six Thousand Trypanosoma cruzi Strains Classified into Discrete Typing Units (DTUs): Attempt at an Inventory.

Authors:  Simone Frédérique Brenière; Etienne Waleckx; Christian Barnabé
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2016-08-29

10.  Secretome analysis of Trypanosoma cruzi by proteomics studies.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Brossas; Julián Ernesto Nicolás Gulin; Margarita Maria Catalina Bisio; Manuel Chapelle; Carine Marinach-Patrice; Mallaury Bordessoules; George Palazon Ruiz; Jeremy Vion; Luc Paris; Jaime Altcheh; Dominique Mazier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.