| Literature DB >> 25847086 |
Louisa A Messenger1, Lineth Garcia, Mathieu Vanhove, Carlos Huaranca, Marinely Bustamante, Marycruz Torrico, Faustino Torrico, Michael A Miles, Martin S Llewellyn.
Abstract
An improved understanding of how a parasite species exploits its genetic repertoire to colonize novel hosts and environmental niches is crucial to establish the epidemiological risk associated with emergent pathogenic genotypes. Trypanosoma cruzi, a genetically heterogeneous, multi-host zoonosis, provides an ideal system to examine the sylvatic diversification of parasitic protozoa. In Bolivia, T. cruzi I, the oldest and most widespread genetic lineage, is pervasive across a range of ecological clines. High-resolution nuclear (26 loci) and mitochondrial (10 loci) genotyping of 199 contemporaneous sylvatic TcI clones was undertaken to provide insights into the biogeographical basis of T. cruzi evolution. Three distinct sylvatic parasite transmission cycles were identified: one highland population among terrestrial rodent and triatomine species, composed of genetically homogenous strains (Ar = 2.95; PA/L = 0.61; DAS = 0.151), and two highly diverse, parasite assemblages circulating among predominantly arboreal mammals and vectors in the lowlands (Ar = 3.40 and 3.93; PA/L = 1.12 and 0.60; DAS = 0.425 and 0.311, respectively). Very limited gene flow between neighbouring terrestrial highland and arboreal lowland areas (distance ~220 km; FST = 0.42 and 0.35) but strong connectivity between ecologically similar but geographically disparate terrestrial highland ecotopes (distance >465 km; FST = 0.016-0.084) strongly supports ecological host fitting as the predominant mechanism of parasite diversification. Dissimilar heterozygosity estimates (excess in highlands, deficit in lowlands) and mitochondrial introgression among lowland strains may indicate fundamental differences in mating strategies between populations. Finally, accelerated parasite dissemination between densely populated, highland areas, compared to uninhabited lowland foci, likely reflects passive, long-range anthroponotic dispersal. The impact of humans on the risk of epizootic Chagas disease transmission in Bolivia is discussed.Entities:
Keywords: Trypanosoma cruzi; ecological fitting; microsatellites; mitochondria; population genetics; sylvatic transmission
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25847086 PMCID: PMC4737126 DOI: 10.1111/mec.13186
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Ecol ISSN: 0962-1083 Impact factor: 6.185
Figure 1Map of Bolivia showing distribution of sylvatic TcI isolates among different ecotopes. Parasite strains were isolated from terrestrial and arboreal transmission cycles in five localities across three departments: Cochabamba, Potosí and Beni. Study sites were situated at altitudes that ranged from ~143 to 3200 m and spanned five different ecoregions: savannah grassland and Madeira‐Tapajós moist forests (Beni), dry Andean puna and Yungas (Cochabamba) and dry montane forests (Potosí). Geographical origins of individual strains are shown by closed red circles. Circle areas are proportionate to sampling density. Images indicate sample host/vector origin (rodent, marsupial, primate or triatomine). Open white circles designate five a priori populations: Cochabamba, Tupiza, Toro Toro, North Beni and East Beni used for population genetic analyses. Population and department names are indicated in uppercase and lowercase, respectively.
Population genetic parameters for sylvatic populations of TcI in Bolivia
| Population | G/N | Max. Freq. MLG |
| PL | PA/L ±SE |
|
|
| % | % |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All highlands | 75/86 | 3 | 0.54 (9/46) | 21 | 0.61 ± 0.15 | 2.95 ± 0.37 | 0.26 | 0.23 | 33.3 | 19 | −0.158 ± 0.02 | 2.06 | <0.001 |
| Cochabamba (highlands) | 25/28 | 2 | 0.40 (4/14) | 20 | 0.42 ± 0.12 | 2.22 ± 0.20 | 0.29 | 0.24 | 30 | 5 | −0.206 ± 0.10 | 2.56 | <0.001 |
| Tupiza (highlands) | 14/15 | 2 | 0.73 (3/6) | 15 | 0.21 ± 0.07 | 2.21 ± 0.29 | 0.28 | 0.28 | 6.7 | 13.3 | 0.026 ± 0.08 | 3.54 | <0.001 |
| Toro Toro (highlands) | 39/43 | 2 | 0.46 (4/26) | 18 | 0.19 ± 0.06 | 1.92 ± 0.21 | 0.25 | 0.20 | 22.2 | 11.1 | −0.241 ± 0.09 | 1.48 | <0.001 |
| North Beni (lowlands) | 22/26 | 2 | 0.81 (4/7) | 19 | 0.60 ± 0.16 | 3.93 ± 0.39 | 0.37 | 0.45 | 10.5 | 63.2 | 0.176 ± 0.06 | 2.70 | <0.001 |
| East Beni (lowlands) | 78/87 | 3 | 0.84 (9/25) | 21 | 1.12 ± 0.29 | 3.40 ± 0.46 | 0.39 | 0.48 | 9.5 | 52.3 | 0.203 ± 0.05 | 2.23 | <0.001 |
N, number of isolates in population; G, number of multilocus genotypes (MLGs) per population based on microsatellite data of 26 loci analysed; Max. Freq. of MLG, frequency of the most common MLG within the population; H, number of haplotypes in population; H d, haplotype diversity measures the uniqueness of a particular haplotype in a given population, calculated using available mitochondrial sequence data in dnasp v5.10.1 (Librado & Rozas 2009); PL, number of polymorphic loci out of 26 loci analysed; A r, allelic richness as a mean over loci ±SE, calculated in fstat 2.9.3.2 (Goudet 1995); PA/L, mean number of private alleles per locus ±SE, calculated in HP‐Rare (Kalinowski 2005); H o, mean observed heterozygosity across all loci; H e, mean expected heterozygosity across all loci; %H E, proportion of loci showing a significant excess in heterozygosity after a sequential Bonferroni correction (Rice 1989); %H d, proportion of loci showing a significant deficit in heterozygosity after a sequential Bonferroni correction (Rice 1989); F IS, mean fixation index ±SE, calculated in fstat 2.9.3.2 (Goudet 1995); I A, index of association calculated in multilocus 1.3b; P‐value estimated by comparison with a null distribution of 1000 randomizations (Agapow & Burt 2001); DAPC, discriminant analysis of principal components.
Population designation based on a priori geographical populations and DAPC/D AS strain assignments.
Figure 2Nuclear genetic clustering among 199 sylvatic Bolivian TcI clones. Multidimensional scaling plot based on discriminant analysis of principal component (DAPC) analysis for 10 clusters defined via K‐means clustering algorithm (109 iterations, three principal components representing 80% of total variation in the data set). Bayesian information criterion (BIC) curve is inserted with error bars representing the standard deviation about the mean of five independent runs. Inertia ellipses correspond to the optimal (as defined by the BIC minimum) number of population clusters among the genotypes analysed. Individual clones are indicated by dots. The 10 DAPC clusters are separated into three genetically distinct groups: highlands (clusters 1, 8 and 10), lowlands 1 (clusters 2, 3 and 6) and lowlands 2 (clusters 4, 5, 7 and 9).
Figure 3Unrooted neighbour‐joining tree based on values between multilocus genotypes generated for 199 sylvatic Bolivian TcI clones. values were calculated as the mean across 1000 random diploid resamplings of the data set. Branch colours indicate isolate a priori population (Cochabamba, Tupiza, Toro Toro, East Beni and North Beni; see legend). Closed grey triangles are adjacent to nodes that receive >60% bootstrap support. Isolates are grouped into three statistically supported clades (highlands, lowlands 1 and lowlands 2). Orange stars denote clones which have phylogenetically incongruent positions between nuclear and mitochondrial topologies.
Figure 4(A) Allelic richness (A r) per microsatellite locus for grouped a priori geographical highland (diamonds) and lowland (squares) populations. Highland populations were characterized by smaller estimates of allelic richness (A r), compared to the lowlands (average of A r = 1.92–2.22 and 3.40 and 3.93, respectively). Error bars represent ±SE about the mean. Values without error bars correspond to markers containing only a single variable locus. (B) Nuclear spatial genetic analysis among Trypanosoma cruzi isolates from highland (open circles) and lowland (closed circles) populations. Nuclear genetic isolation by distance (IBD) was observed among lowland populations ( = 0.209, P < 0.001; slope = 0.0003 ± 0.0000179), while no spatial structure was evident among highland populations spanning a much greater geographical area ( = 0.109, P = 0.085; slope = 0.0002 ± 0.0000307).
F ST values in a five way comparison between populations (P‐value indicated in brackets)
| Cochabamba (highlands) | Tupiza (highlands) | Toro Toro (highlands) | North Beni (lowlands) | East Beni (lowlands) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cochabamba (highlands) | * | ||||
| Tupiza (highlands) | 0.084 (0.00089 ± 0.0003) | * | |||
| Toro Toro (highlands) | 0.016 (0.00317 ± 0.0006) | 0.079 (0.00010 ± 0.0001) | * | ||
| North Beni (lowlands) | 0.42 (0.000 ± 0.000) | 0.25 (0.000 ± 0.000) | 0.50 (0.000 ± 0.000) | * | |
| East Beni (lowlands) | 0.35 (0.000 ± 0.000) | 0.26 (0.000 ± 0.000) | 0.40 (0.000 ± 0.000) | 0.087 (0.000 ± 0.000) | * |
Figure 5Maximum‐likelihood (ML) tree constructed from concatenated maxicircle sequences for 78 sylvatic Bolivian TcI clones and 24 additional TcI isolates from across the Americas. A ML topology was constructed from concatenated maxicircle sequences for 78 sylvatic Bolivian TcI clones and rooted using 24 additional TcI strains belonging to six previously characterized populations (AM orth/Cen, ANDES ol/Chile, ARG orth, BRAZ orth‐East, VEN dom and VEN silv from Messenger et al. 2012). The most appropriate nucleotide substitution model was TrN+G (six substitution rate categories) based on the Akaike information criterion. Branch colours indicate sample a priori population (Cochabamba, Tupiza, Toro Toro, East Beni and North Beni; see legend). Statistical support for major clades are given as equivalent bootstraps and posterior probabilities from consensus ML (1000 pseudoreplicates) and Bayesian trees (based on the GTR+G model), respectively. Orange stars denote clones which have statistically supported phylogenetically incongruent positions between nuclear and mitochondrial topologies.