Patric Glynn1, Hassan Musa1, Xiangqiong Wu1, Sathya D Unudurthi1, Sean Little1, Lan Qian1, Patrick J Wright1, Przemyslaw B Radwanski1, Sandor Gyorke1, Peter J Mohler1, Thomas J Hund2. 1. From Dorothy M. Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus (P.G., H.M., X.W., S.D.U., S.L., L.Q., P.J.W., P.B.R., S.G., P.J.M., T.J.H.); Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus (P.G., X.W., S.D.U., L.Q., T.J.H.); Departments of Physiology & Cell Biology (H.M., S.L., P.J.W., P.B.R., S.G., P.J.M.) and Internal Medicine (P.J.M., T.J.H.), The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus; and Division of Pharmacy Practice and Administration, College of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University, Columbus (P.B.R.). 2. From Dorothy M. Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus (P.G., H.M., X.W., S.D.U., S.L., L.Q., P.J.W., P.B.R., S.G., P.J.M., T.J.H.); Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus (P.G., X.W., S.D.U., L.Q., T.J.H.); Departments of Physiology & Cell Biology (H.M., S.L., P.J.W., P.B.R., S.G., P.J.M.) and Internal Medicine (P.J.M., T.J.H.), The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus; and Division of Pharmacy Practice and Administration, College of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University, Columbus (P.B.R.). Thomas.Hund@osumc.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Voltage-gated Na(+) channels (Nav) are essential for myocyte membrane excitability and cardiac function. Nav current (INa) is a large-amplitude, short-duration spike generated by rapid channel activation followed immediately by inactivation. However, even under normal conditions, a small late component of INa (INa,L) persists because of incomplete/failed inactivation of a subpopulation of channels. Notably, INa,L is directly linked with both congenital and acquired disease states. The multifunctional Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CaMKII) has been identified as an important activator of INa,L in disease. Several potential CaMKII phosphorylation sites have been discovered, including Ser571 in the Nav1.5 DI-DII linker, but the molecular mechanism underlying CaMKII-dependent regulation of INa,L in vivo remains unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: To determine the in vivo role of Ser571, 2 Scn5a knock-in mouse models were generated expressing either: (1) Nav1.5 with a phosphomimetic mutation at Ser571 (S571E), or (2) Nav1.5 with the phosphorylation site ablated (S571A). Electrophysiology studies revealed that Ser571 regulates INa,L but not other channel properties previously linked to CaMKII. Ser571-mediated increases in INa,L promote abnormal repolarization and intracellular Ca(2+) handling and increase susceptibility to arrhythmia at the cellular and animal level. Importantly, Ser571 is required for maladaptive remodeling and arrhythmias in response to pressure overload. CONCLUSIONS: Our data provide the first in vivo evidence for the molecular mechanism underlying CaMKII activation of the pathogenic INa,L. Relevant for improved rational design of potential therapies, our findings demonstrate that Ser571-dependent regulation of Nav1.5 specifically tunes INa,L without altering critical physiological components of the current.
BACKGROUND: Voltage-gated Na(+) channels (Nav) are essential for myocyte membrane excitability and cardiac function. Nav current (INa) is a large-amplitude, short-duration spike generated by rapid channel activation followed immediately by inactivation. However, even under normal conditions, a small late component of INa (INa,L) persists because of incomplete/failed inactivation of a subpopulation of channels. Notably, INa,L is directly linked with both congenital and acquired disease states. The multifunctional Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CaMKII) has been identified as an important activator of INa,L in disease. Several potential CaMKII phosphorylation sites have been discovered, including Ser571 in the Nav1.5DI-DII linker, but the molecular mechanism underlying CaMKII-dependent regulation of INa,L in vivo remains unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: To determine the in vivo role of Ser571, 2 Scn5a knock-in mouse models were generated expressing either: (1) Nav1.5 with a phosphomimetic mutation at Ser571 (S571E), or (2) Nav1.5 with the phosphorylation site ablated (S571A). Electrophysiology studies revealed that Ser571 regulates INa,L but not other channel properties previously linked to CaMKII. Ser571-mediated increases in INa,L promote abnormal repolarization and intracellular Ca(2+) handling and increase susceptibility to arrhythmia at the cellular and animal level. Importantly, Ser571 is required for maladaptive remodeling and arrhythmias in response to pressure overload. CONCLUSIONS: Our data provide the first in vivo evidence for the molecular mechanism underlying CaMKII activation of the pathogenic INa,L. Relevant for improved rational design of potential therapies, our findings demonstrate that Ser571-dependent regulation of Nav1.5 specifically tunes INa,L without altering critical physiological components of the current.
Authors: Ralph J van Oort; Mark D McCauley; Sayali S Dixit; Laetitia Pereira; Yi Yang; Jonathan L Respress; Qiongling Wang; Angela C De Almeida; Darlene G Skapura; Mark E Anderson; Donald M Bers; Xander H T Wehrens Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-11-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Thomas J Hund; Jedidiah S Snyder; Xiangqiong Wu; Patric Glynn; Olha M Koval; Birce Onal; Nicholas D Leymaster; Sathya D Unudurthi; Jerry Curran; Celia Camardo; Patrick J Wright; Philip F Binkley; Mark E Anderson; Peter J Mohler Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2014-01-20 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: Carmen R Valdivia; William W Chu; Jielin Pu; Jason D Foell; Robert A Haworth; Mathew R Wolff; Timothy J Kamp; Jonathan C Makielski Journal: J Mol Cell Cardiol Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 5.000
Authors: Nicole M Ashpole; Anthony W Herren; Kenneth S Ginsburg; Joseph D Brogan; Derrick E Johnson; Theodore R Cummins; Donald M Bers; Andy Hudmon Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2012-04-18 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Sakima A Smith; Langston D Hughes; Crystal F Kline; Amber N Kempton; Lisa E Dorn; Jerry Curran; Michael Makara; Tyler R Webb; Patrick Wright; Niels Voigt; Philip F Binkley; Paul M L Janssen; Ahmet Kilic; Cynthia A Carnes; Dobromir Dobrev; Matthew N Rasband; Thomas J Hund; Peter J Mohler Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2016-04-22 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Sathya D Unudurthi; Drew M Nassal; Nehal J Patel; Evelyn Thomas; Jane Yu; Curtis G Pierson; Shyam S Bansal; Peter J Mohler; Thomas J Hund Journal: Life Sci Date: 2020-02-15 Impact factor: 5.037
Authors: Alexey V Zaitsev; Natalia S Torres; Keiko M Cawley; Amira D Sabry; Junco S Warren; Mark Warren Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2019-03-15 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Hassan Musa; Crystal F Kline; Amy C Sturm; Nathaniel Murphy; Sara Adelman; Chaojian Wang; Haidun Yan; Benjamin L Johnson; Thomas A Csepe; Ahmet Kilic; Robert S D Higgins; Paul M L Janssen; Vadim V Fedorov; Raul Weiss; Christina Salazar; Thomas J Hund; Geoffrey S Pitt; Peter J Mohler Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-09-21 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Martina Comelli; Marianna Meo; Daniel O Cervantes; Emanuele Pizzo; Aaron Plosker; Peter J Mohler; Thomas J Hund; Jason T Jacobson; Olivier Meste; Marcello Rota Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2020-09-04 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Jiali Nie; Quanlu Duan; Mengying He; Xianqing Li; Bei Wang; Chi Zhou; Lujin Wu; Zheng Wen; Chen Chen; Dao Wu Wang; Katherina M Alsina; Xander H T Wehrens; Dao Wen Wang; Li Ni Journal: J Cell Physiol Date: 2018-11-29 Impact factor: 6.384