Literature DB >> 26186902

Genomic predictors of patterns of progression in glioblastoma and possible influences on radiation field design.

Jordan A Holmes1, Anna K Paulsson2, Brandi R Page3, Lance D Miller4, Wennuan Liu5, Jianfeng Xu5, William H Hinson3, Glenn J Lesser6,7, Adrian W Laxton8, Stephen B Tatter7,8, Waldemar Debinski7,8, Michael D Chan3,7.   

Abstract

We present a retrospective investigation of the role of genomics in the prediction of central versus marginal disease progression patterns for glioblastoma (GBM). Between August 2000 and May 2010, 41 patients with GBM and gene expression and methylation data available were treated with radiotherapy with or without concurrent temozolomide. Location of disease progression was categorized as within the high dose (60 Gy) or low dose (46 Gy) volume. Samples were grouped into previously described TCGA genomic groupings: Mesenchymal (m), classical (c), proneural (pn), and neural (n); and were also classified by MGMT-Methylation status and G-Cimp methylation phenotype. Genomic groupings and methylation status were investigated as a possible predictor of disease progression in the high dose region, progression in the low dose region, and time to progression. Based on TCGA category there was no difference in OS (p = 0.26), 60 Gy progression (PN: 71 %, N: 60 %, M: 89 %, C: 83 %, p = 0.19), 46 Gy progression (PN: 57 %, N: 40 %, M: 61 %,C: 50 %, p = 0.8) or time to progression (PN: 9 months, N:15 months, M: 9 months, C: 7 months, p = 0.58). MGMT methylation predicted for improved OS (median 25 vs. 13 months, p = 0.01), improved DFS (median 13 vs. 8 months, p = 0.007) and decreased 60 Gy (p = 0.003) and 46 Gy (p = 0.006) progression. There was a cohort of MGMT methylated patients with late marginal disease progression (4/22 patients, 18 %). TCGA groups demonstrated no difference in survival or progression patterns. MGMT methylation predicted for a statistically significant decrease in in-field and marginal disease progression. There was a cohort of MGMT methylated patients with late marginal progression. Validations of these findings would have implications that could affect radiation field size.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genomics; Glioblastoma; Patterns of progression

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26186902      PMCID: PMC4584190          DOI: 10.1007/s11060-015-1858-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  21 in total

1.  The somatic genomic landscape of glioblastoma.

Authors:  Cameron W Brennan; Roel G W Verhaak; Aaron McKenna; Benito Campos; Houtan Noushmehr; Sofie R Salama; Siyuan Zheng; Debyani Chakravarty; J Zachary Sanborn; Samuel H Berman; Rameen Beroukhim; Brady Bernard; Chang-Jiun Wu; Giannicola Genovese; Ilya Shmulevich; Jill Barnholtz-Sloan; Lihua Zou; Rahulsimham Vegesna; Sachet A Shukla; Giovanni Ciriello; W K Yung; Wei Zhang; Carrie Sougnez; Tom Mikkelsen; Kenneth Aldape; Darell D Bigner; Erwin G Van Meir; Michael Prados; Andrew Sloan; Keith L Black; Jennifer Eschbacher; Gaetano Finocchiaro; William Friedman; David W Andrews; Abhijit Guha; Mary Iacocca; Brian P O'Neill; Greg Foltz; Jerome Myers; Daniel J Weisenberger; Robert Penny; Raju Kucherlapati; Charles M Perou; D Neil Hayes; Richard Gibbs; Marco Marra; Gordon B Mills; Eric Lander; Paul Spellman; Richard Wilson; Chris Sander; John Weinstein; Matthew Meyerson; Stacey Gabriel; Peter W Laird; David Haussler; Gad Getz; Lynda Chin
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  MGMT methylation analysis of glioblastoma on the Infinium methylation BeadChip identifies two distinct CpG regions associated with gene silencing and outcome, yielding a prediction model for comparisons across datasets, tumor grades, and CIMP-status.

Authors:  Pierre Bady; Davide Sciuscio; Annie-Claire Diserens; Jocelyne Bloch; Martin J van den Bent; Christine Marosi; Pierre-Yves Dietrich; Michael Weller; Luigi Mariani; Frank L Heppner; David R Mcdonald; Denis Lacombe; Roger Stupp; Mauro Delorenzi; Monika E Hegi
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 17.088

3.  Pattern of failure after limited margin radiotherapy and temozolomide for glioblastoma.

Authors:  Mark W McDonald; Hui-Kuo G Shu; Walter J Curran; Ian R Crocker
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 4.  Radiation oncology in brain tumors: current approaches and clinical trials in progress.

Authors:  Michael D Chan; Stephen B Tatter; Glenn Lesser; Edward G Shaw
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 2.264

5.  Patterns of failure following treatment for glioblastoma multiforme and anaplastic astrocytoma.

Authors:  K E Wallner; J H Galicich; G Krol; E Arbit; M G Malkin
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Molecular subclasses of high-grade glioma predict prognosis, delineate a pattern of disease progression, and resemble stages in neurogenesis.

Authors:  Heidi S Phillips; Samir Kharbanda; Ruihuan Chen; William F Forrest; Robert H Soriano; Thomas D Wu; Anjan Misra; Janice M Nigro; Howard Colman; Liliana Soroceanu; P Mickey Williams; Zora Modrusan; Burt G Feuerstein; Ken Aldape
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 31.743

7.  Comparison of clinical outcomes and genomic characteristics of single focus and multifocal glioblastoma.

Authors:  Anna K Paulsson; Jordan A Holmes; Ann M Peiffer; Lance D Miller; Wennuan Liu; Jianfeng Xu; William H Hinson; Glenn J Lesser; Adrian W Laxton; Stephen B Tatter; Waldemar Debinski; Michael D Chan
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 4.130

8.  Limited margins using modern radiotherapy techniques does not increase marginal failure rate of glioblastoma.

Authors:  Anna K Paulsson; Kevin P McMullen; Ann M Peiffer; William H Hinson; William T Kearns; Annette J Johnson; Glenn J Lesser; Thomas L Ellis; Stephen B Tatter; Waldemar Debinski; Edward G Shaw; Michael D Chan
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.339

9.  MGMT promoter methylation status can predict the incidence and outcome of pseudoprogression after concomitant radiochemotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients.

Authors:  Alba A Brandes; Enrico Franceschi; Alicia Tosoni; Valeria Blatt; Annalisa Pession; Giovanni Tallini; Roberta Bertorelle; Stefania Bartolini; Fabio Calbucci; Alvaro Andreoli; Giampiero Frezza; Marco Leonardi; Federica Spagnolli; Mario Ermani
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Identification of new differentially methylated genes that have potential functional consequences in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jin W Kim; Seong-Tae Kim; Aubrey R Turner; Tracey Young; Shelly Smith; Wennuan Liu; Johan Lindberg; Lars Egevad; Henrik Gronberg; William B Isaacs; Jianfeng Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Glioblastoma radiomics: can genomic and molecular characteristics correlate with imaging response patterns?

Authors:  Michael H Soike; Emory R McTyre; Nameeta Shah; Ralph B Puchalski; Jordan A Holmes; Anna K Paulsson; Lance D Miller; Christina K Cramer; Glenn J Lesser; Roy E Strowd; William H Hinson; Ryan T Mott; Annette J Johnson; Hui-Wen Lo; Adrian W Laxton; Stephen B Tatter; Waldemar Debinski; Michael D Chan
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Clinical outcomes of dose-escalated re-irradiation in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma.

Authors:  Corbin A Helis; Shih-Ni Prim; Christina K Cramer; Roy Strowd; Glenn J Lesser; Jaclyn J White; Stephen B Tatter; Adrian W Laxton; Christopher Whitlow; Hui-Wen Lo; Waldemar Debinski; James D Ververs; Paul J Black; Michael D Chan
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2022-05-02

3.  Impact of Including Peritumoral Edema in Radiotherapy Target Volume on Patterns of Failure in Glioblastoma following Temozolomide-based Chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Seo Hee Choi; Jun Won Kim; Jee Suk Chang; Jae Ho Cho; Se Hoon Kim; Jong Hee Chang; Chang-Ok Suh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.