Literature DB >> 26185384

Efficacy of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor grading.

Mitsuru Sugimoto1, Tadayuki Takagi1, Takuto Hikichi1, Rei Suzuki1, Ko Watanabe1, Jun Nakamura1, Hitomi Kikuchi1, Naoki Konno1, Yuichi Waragai1, Hiroyuki Asama1, Mika Takasumi1, Hiroshi Watanabe1, Katsutoshi Obara1, Hiromasa Ohira1.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for grading pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs).
METHODS: A total of 22 patients were diagnosed with PNET by EUS-FNA between October 2001 and December 2013 at Fukushima Medical University Hospital. Among these cases, we targeted 10 PNET patients who were evaluated according to the World Health Organization (WHO) 2010 classification. Surgery was performed in eight patients, and chemotherapy was performed in two patients due to multiple liver metastases. Specimens obtained by EUS-FNA were first stained with hematoxylin and eosin and then stained with chromogranin, synaptophysin, CD56, and Ki-67. The specimens were graded by the Ki-67 index according to the WHO 2010 classification. Specimens obtained by surgery were graded by the Ki-67 index and mitotic count (WHO 2010 classification). For the eight specimens obtained by EUS-FNA, the Ki-67 index results were compared with those obtained by surgery. In the two cases treated with chemotherapy, the effects and prognoses were evaluated.
RESULTS: The sampling rate for histological diagnosis by EUS-FNA was 100%. No adverse effects were observed. The concordance rate between specimens obtained by EUS-FNA and surgery was 87.5% (7/8). For the two cases treated with chemotherapy, case 1 received somatostatin analog therapy and transcatheter arterial infusion (TAI) targeting multiple liver metastases. Subsequent treatment consisted of everolimus. During chemotherapy, the primary tumor remained unconfirmed, although the multiple liver metastases diminished dramatically. Case 2 was classified as neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) according to the Ki-67 index of a specimen obtained by EUS-FNA; therefore, cisplatin and irinotecan therapy was started. However, severe adverse effects, including renal failure and diarrhea, were observed, and the therapy regimen was changed to cisplatin and etoposide. TAI targeting multiple liver metastases was performed. Although the liver metastases diminished, the primary tumor remained unconfirmed. These chemotherapy regimens had immediate effects for both unresectable neuroendocrine tumor (NET) and NEC cases. These two subjects are still alive.
CONCLUSION: EUS-FNA was effective for PNET diagnosis and Ki-67 index grading for WHO 2010 classification, enabling informed decisions on unresectable PNET treatment by identifying NET or NEC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemotherapy; Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration; Ki-67 index; Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor; World Health Organization classification 2010

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26185384      PMCID: PMC4499355          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i26.8118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  28 in total

1.  Consensus guidelines for the management of patients with liver metastases from digestive (neuro)endocrine tumors: foregut, midgut, hindgut, and unknown primary.

Authors:  Thomas Steinmüller; Reza Kianmanesh; Massimo Falconi; Aldo Scarpa; Babs Taal; Dik J Kwekkeboom; José M Lopes; Aurel Perren; George Nikou; James Yao; Gian Franco Delle Fave; Dermot O'Toole
Journal:  Neuroendocrinology       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 4.914

2.  Cytological Ki-67 in pancreatic endocrine tumours: an opportunity for pre-operative grading.

Authors:  Cecilia Piani; Giulia M Franchi; Chiara Cappelletti; Marina Scavini; Luca Albarello; Alessandro Zerbi; Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono; Emanuele Bosi; Marco F Manzoni
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.678

3.  Prognostic factors in patients with endocrine tumours of the duodenopancreatic area.

Authors:  I Madeira; B Terris; M Voss; A Denys; A Sauvanet; J F Flejou; V Vilgrain; J Belghiti; P Bernades; P Ruszniewski
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  The usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for the diagnosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors based on the World Health Organization classification.

Authors:  Jun Unno; Atsushi Kanno; Atsushi Masamune; Atsuko Kasajima; Fumiyoshi Fujishima; Kazuyuki Ishida; Shin Hamada; Kiyoshi Kume; Kazuhiro Kikuta; Morihisa Hirota; Fuyuhiko Motoi; Michiaki Unno; Tooru Shimosegawa
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 2.423

5.  Neuroendocrine hepatic metastases: does aggressive management improve survival?

Authors:  John G Touzios; James M Kiely; Susan C Pitt; William S Rilling; Edward J Quebbeman; Stuart D Wilson; Henry A Pitt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Treatment of neuroendocrine carcinomas with combined etoposide and cisplatin. Evidence of major therapeutic activity in the anaplastic variants of these neoplasms.

Authors:  C G Moertel; L K Kvols; M J O'Connell; J Rubin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1991-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  EUS-guided FNA in the diagnosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors before surgery.

Authors:  José Celso Ardengh; Gustavo Andrade de Paulo; Angelo Paulo Ferrari
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 8.  One hundred years after "carcinoid": epidemiology of and prognostic factors for neuroendocrine tumors in 35,825 cases in the United States.

Authors:  James C Yao; Manal Hassan; Alexandria Phan; Cecile Dagohoy; Colleen Leary; Jeannette E Mares; Eddie K Abdalla; Jason B Fleming; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Asif Rashid; Douglas B Evans
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Prognostic relevance of a novel TNM classification system for upper gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Ulrich-Frank Pape; Henning Jann; Jacqueline Müller-Nordhorn; Angelina Bockelbrink; Uta Berndt; Stefan N Willich; Martin Koch; Christoph Röcken; Guido Rindi; Bertram Wiedenmann
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Treatment of poorly differentiated neuroendocrine tumours with etoposide and cisplatin.

Authors:  E Mitry; E Baudin; M Ducreux; J C Sabourin; P Rufié; T Aparicio; T Aparicio; P Lasser; D Elias; P Duvillard; M Schlumberger; P Rougier
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Imaging of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: recent advances, current status, and controversies.

Authors:  Lingaku Lee; Tetsuhide Ito; Robert T Jensen
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 4.512

2.  Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound using time-intensity curve analysis predicts pathological grade of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm.

Authors:  Saimon Takada; Hironari Kato; Yosuke Saragai; Shinichiro Muro; Daisuke Uchida; Takeshi Tomoda; Kazuyuki Matsumoto; Shigeru Horiguchi; Noriyuki Tanaka; Hiroyuki Okada
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2019-08-03       Impact factor: 1.314

3.  Reliability of Ki-67 Determination in FNA Samples for Grading Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  Cristina Díaz Del Arco; J Ángel Díaz Pérez; Luis Ortega Medina; Javier Sastre Valera; M Jesús Fernández Aceñero
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.943

Review 4.  [Grading of neuroendocrine tumors].

Authors:  W Saeger; P A Schnabel; P Komminoth
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.011

5.  Evolving role of the endoscopist in management of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Cemal Yazici; Brian R Boulay
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor Grade 1 patients followed up without surgery: Case series.

Authors:  Mitsuru Sugimoto; Tadayuki Takagi; Rei Suzuki; Naoki Konno; Hiroyuki Asama; Ko Watanabe; Jun Nakamura; Hitomi Kikuchi; Yuichi Waragai; Mika Takasumi; Satoshi Kawana; Yuko Hashimoto; Takuto Hikichi; Hiromasa Ohira
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-06-10

7.  Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasm Invading the Entire Main Pancreatic Duct Diagnosed by a Preoperative Endoscopic Biopsy.

Authors:  Tomoya Kimura; Mitsuru Sugimoto; Tadayuki Takagi; Rei Suzuki; Naoki Konno; Hiroyuki Asama; Yuki Sato; Hiroki Irie; Jun Nakamura; Mika Takasumi; Minami Hashimoto; Tsunetaka Kato; Yasuhide Kofunato; Takashi Kimura; Shoki Yamada; Yuko Hashimoto; Shigeru Marubashi; Takuto Hikichi; Hiromasa Ohira
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2020-05-23       Impact factor: 1.271

8.  Two giant retroperitoneal schwannomas mimicking adrenal malignancy - a case report.

Authors:  Isabelle Fülber; Katharina Peer; Elisabeth Maurer; Detlef K Bartsch; Jannis Görlach; Joachim Nils Göbel; Marion Roeßler; Katharina Holzer
Journal:  Innov Surg Sci       Date:  2020-08-31

Review 9.  An update on the diagnosis of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Authors:  Jiayun M Fang; Jay Li; Jiaqi Shi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 5.374

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.