| Literature DB >> 26185249 |
Lauchlan H Fraser1, Jason Pither2, Anke Jentsch3, Marcelo Sternberg4, Martin Zobel5, Diana Askarizadeh6, Sandor Bartha7, Carl Beierkuhnlein8, Jonathan A Bennett9, Alex Bittel10, Bazartseren Boldgiv11, Ilsi I Boldrini12, Edward Bork13, Leslie Brown14, Marcelo Cabido15, James Cahill9, Cameron N Carlyle13, Giandiego Campetella16, Stefano Chelli16, Ofer Cohen4, Anna-Maria Csergo17, Sandra Díaz15, Lucas Enrico15, David Ensing2, Alessandra Fidelis18, Jason D Fridley19, Bryan Foster10, Heath Garris20, Jacob R Goheen21, Hugh A L Henry22, Maria Hohn23, Mohammad Hassan Jouri24, John Klironomos2, Kadri Koorem5, Rachael Lawrence-Lodge25, Ruijun Long26, Pete Manning27, Randall Mitchell20, Mari Moora5, Sandra C Müller28, Carlos Nabinger29, Kamal Naseri30, Gerhard E Overbeck12, Todd M Palmer31, Sheena Parsons10, Mari Pesek10, Valério D Pillar28, Robert M Pringle32, Kathy Roccaforte10, Amanda Schmidt33, Zhanhuan Shang26, Reinhold Stahlmann8, Gisela C Stotz9, Shu-ichi Sugiyama34, Szilárd Szentes35, Don Thompson36, Radnaakhand Tungalag11, Sainbileg Undrakhbold11, Margaretha van Rooyen37, Camilla Wellstein38, J Bastow Wilson39, Talita Zupo18.
Abstract
The search for predictions of species diversity across environmental gradients has challenged ecologists for decades. The humped-back model (HBM) suggests that plant diversity peaks at intermediate productivity; at low productivity few species can tolerate the environmental stresses, and at high productivity a few highly competitive species dominate. Over time the HBM has become increasingly controversial, and recent studies claim to have refuted it. Here, by using data from coordinated surveys conducted throughout grasslands worldwide and comprising a wide range of site productivities, we provide evidence in support of the HBM pattern at both global and regional extents. The relationships described here provide a foundation for further research into the local, landscape, and historical factors that maintain biodiversity.Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26185249 DOI: 10.1126/science.aab3916
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Science ISSN: 0036-8075 Impact factor: 47.728