Literature DB >> 27114584

The influence of balanced and imbalanced resource supply on biodiversity-functioning relationship across ecosystems.

Aleksandra M Lewandowska1, Antje Biermann2, Elizabeth T Borer3, Miguel A Cebrián-Piqueras4, Steven A J Declerck5, Luc De Meester6, Ellen Van Donk7, Lars Gamfeldt8, Daniel S Gruner9, Nicole Hagenah10, W Stanley Harpole11, Kevin P Kirkman10, Christopher A Klausmeier12, Michael Kleyer4, Johannes M H Knops13, Pieter Lemmens6, Eric M Lind3, Elena Litchman14, Jasmin Mantilla-Contreras15, Koen Martens16, Sandra Meier17, Vanessa Minden4, Joslin L Moore18, Harry Olde Venterink19, Eric W Seabloom3, Ulrich Sommer2, Maren Striebel17, Anastasia Trenkamp15, Juliane Trinogga4, Jotaro Urabe20, Wim Vyverman21, Dedmer B Van de Waal5, Claire E Widdicombe22, Helmut Hillebrand17.   

Abstract

Numerous studies show that increasing species richness leads to higher ecosystem productivity. This effect is often attributed to more efficient portioning of multiple resources in communities with higher numbers of competing species, indicating the role of resource supply and stoichiometry for biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationships. Here, we merged theory on ecological stoichiometry with a framework of biodiversity-ecosystem functioning to understand how resource use transfers into primary production. We applied a structural equation model to define patterns of diversity-productivity relationships with respect to available resources. Meta-analysis was used to summarize the findings across ecosystem types ranging from aquatic ecosystems to grasslands and forests. As hypothesized, resource supply increased realized productivity and richness, but we found significant differences between ecosystems and study types. Increased richness was associated with increased productivity, although this effect was not seen in experiments. More even communities had lower productivity, indicating that biomass production is often maintained by a few dominant species, and reduced dominance generally reduced ecosystem productivity. This synthesis, which integrates observational and experimental studies in a variety of ecosystems and geographical regions, exposes common patterns and differences in biodiversity-functioning relationships, and increases the mechanistic understanding of changes in ecosystems productivity.
© 2016 The Author(s).

Keywords:  biodiversity–ecosystem functioning; evenness; nutrient network; productivity; richness; stoichiometry

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27114584      PMCID: PMC4843703          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  22 in total

1.  Phenotypic diversity and ecosystem functioning in changing environments: a theoretical framework.

Authors:  J Norberg; D P Swaney; J Dushoff; J Lin; R Casagrandi; S A Levin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-09-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Productivity is a poor predictor of plant species richness.

Authors:  Peter B Adler; Eric W Seabloom; Elizabeth T Borer; Helmut Hillebrand; Yann Hautier; Andy Hector; W Stanley Harpole; Lydia R O'Halloran; James B Grace; T Michael Anderson; Jonathan D Bakker; Lori A Biederman; Cynthia S Brown; Yvonne M Buckley; Laura B Calabrese; Cheng-Jin Chu; Elsa E Cleland; Scott L Collins; Kathryn L Cottingham; Michael J Crawley; Ellen I Damschen; Kendi F Davies; Nicole M DeCrappeo; Philip A Fay; Jennifer Firn; Paul Frater; Eve I Gasarch; Daniel S Gruner; Nicole Hagenah; Janneke Hille Ris Lambers; Hope Humphries; Virginia L Jin; Adam D Kay; Kevin P Kirkman; Julia A Klein; Johannes M H Knops; Kimberly J La Pierre; John G Lambrinos; Wei Li; Andrew S MacDougall; Rebecca L McCulley; Brett A Melbourne; Charles E Mitchell; Joslin L Moore; John W Morgan; Brent Mortensen; John L Orrock; Suzanne M Prober; David A Pyke; Anita C Risch; Martin Schuetz; Melinda D Smith; Carly J Stevens; Lauren L Sullivan; Gang Wang; Peter D Wragg; Justin P Wright; Louie H Yang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Meta-analyses and mega-mistakes: calling time on meta-analysis of the species richness-productivity relationship.

Authors:  Robert J Whittaker
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.499

4.  Integrative modelling reveals mechanisms linking productivity and plant species richness.

Authors:  James B Grace; T Michael Anderson; Eric W Seabloom; Elizabeth T Borer; Peter B Adler; W Stanley Harpole; Yann Hautier; Helmut Hillebrand; Eric M Lind; Meelis Pärtel; Jonathan D Bakker; Yvonne M Buckley; Michael J Crawley; Ellen I Damschen; Kendi F Davies; Philip A Fay; Jennifer Firn; Daniel S Gruner; Andy Hector; Johannes M H Knops; Andrew S MacDougall; Brett A Melbourne; John W Morgan; John L Orrock; Suzanne M Prober; Melinda D Smith
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Does species richness drive community production or vice versa? Reconciling historical and contemporary paradigms in competitive communities.

Authors:  Kevin Gross; Bradley J Cardinale
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Does productivity drive diversity or vice versa? A test of the multivariate productivity-diversity hypothesis in streams.

Authors:  Bradley J Cardinale; Danuta M Bennett; Craig E Nelson; Kevin Gross
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.499

7.  Diversity predicts stability and resource use efficiency in natural phytoplankton communities.

Authors:  Robert Ptacnik; Angelo G Solimini; Tom Andersen; Timo Tamminen; Pål Brettum; Liisa Lepistö; Eva Willén; Seppo Rekolainen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Resource stoichiometry and consumers control the biodiversity-productivity relationship in pelagic metacommunities.

Authors:  Helmut Hillebrand; Viola Lehmpfuhl
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.926

9.  Species distributions in response to individual soil nutrients and seasonal drought across a community of tropical trees.

Authors:  Richard Condit; Bettina M J Engelbrecht; Delicia Pino; Rolando Pérez; Benjamin L Turner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Can retention forestry help conserve biodiversity? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Katja Fedrowitz; Julia Koricheva; Susan C Baker; David B Lindenmayer; Brian Palik; Raul Rosenvald; William Beese; Jerry F Franklin; Jari Kouki; Ellen Macdonald; Christian Messier; Anne Sverdrup-Thygeson; Lena Gustafsson
Journal:  J Appl Ecol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 6.528

View more
  4 in total

1.  Plant diversity enhances productivity and soil carbon storage.

Authors:  Shiping Chen; Wantong Wang; Wenting Xu; Yang Wang; Hongwei Wan; Dima Chen; Zhiyao Tang; Xuli Tang; Guoyi Zhou; Zongqiang Xie; Daowei Zhou; Zhouping Shangguan; Jianhui Huang; Jin-Sheng He; Yanfen Wang; Jiandong Sheng; Lisong Tang; Xinrong Li; Ming Dong; Yan Wu; Qiufeng Wang; Zhiheng Wang; Jianguo Wu; F Stuart Chapin; Yongfei Bai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Studying biodiversity-ecosystem function relationships in experimental microcosms among islands.

Authors:  Anette Teittinen; Janne Soininen; Leena Virta
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 6.431

3.  Herbivore dung quality affects plant community diversity.

Authors:  Elena Valdés-Correcher; Judith Sitters; Martin Wassen; Natacha Brion; Harry Olde Venterink
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Cascading effects of climate change on plankton community structure.

Authors:  Grace E P Murphy; Tamara N Romanuk; Boris Worm
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 2.912

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.