| Literature DB >> 26184765 |
Gideon Rutaremwa1,2, Stephen Ojiambo Wandera3, Tapiwa Jhamba4, Edith Akiror5, Angela Kiconco6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Uganda's poor maternal health indicators have resulted from weak maternal health services delivery, including access to quality family planning, skilled birth attendance, emergency obstetric care, and postnatal care for mothers and newborns. This paper investigated the predictors of maternal health services (MHS) utilization characterized as: desirable, moderate and undesirable.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26184765 PMCID: PMC4504353 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-015-0943-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Health Serv Res ISSN: 1472-6963 Impact factor: 2.655
Weighted percentage distribution of respondents by selected background characteristics and year of survey
| Variable | Category | Number | Percent (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Education level attainment | None | 217 | 12.3 |
| Primary | 1,132 | 64.2 | |
| Secondary + | 414 | 23.5 | |
| Region of residence | Kampala | 107 | 6.1 |
| Central | 374 | 21.2 | |
| Eastern | 483 | 27.4 | |
| Northern | 313 | 17.7 | |
| Western | 487 | 27.6 | |
| Religion | Catholic | 739 | 41.9 |
| Protestant | 755 | 42.8 | |
| Muslim | 216 | 12.2 | |
| All others | 54 | 3.1 | |
| Age group | 15-19 | 212 | 12.0 |
| 20-34 | 1,287 | 73.0 | |
| 25-49 | 265 | 15.0 | |
| Rural/Urban residence | Urban | 268 | 15.2 |
| Rural | 1495 | 84.2 | |
| Wealth Index | Poor | 762 | 42.3 |
| Middle | 363 | 20.6 | |
| Rich | 639 | 36.2 | |
| Marital status | Never married | 90 | 5.1 |
| Currently married | 1,511 | 85.8 | |
| Previously married | 160 | 9.1 | |
| Children ever born | 1-3 | 875 | 49.6 |
| 4-6 | 538 | 30.5 | |
| 7+ | 351 | 19.9 | |
| Distance to health facility | Big issue | 777 | 44.1 |
| Not a big issue | 985 | 55.9 | |
| Visited health facility in past year | No - Did not visit | 315 | 17.9 |
| Yes-Visited | 1445 | 82.1 | |
| MHS package utilized | Undesirable | 1,560 | 90.1 |
| Desirable | 80 | 4.6 | |
| Moderate | 92 | 5.3 |
Percentage distribution of respondents by selected background variables, and utilization of maternal health services in Uganda in 2011
| Variable/category | Type of services package utilized | Number | Significance | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desirable | Moderate | Un-desirable | |||
| Education Level | |||||
| None | 95.3 | 1.6 | 3.1 | 217 | |
| Primary | 93.1 | 2.5 | 4.4 | 1,132 | 0.00 |
| Secondary + | 84.1 | 9.2 | 6.8 | 414 | |
| Region | |||||
| Kampala | 74.9 | 11.4 | 13.7 | 107 | |
| Central | 92.1 | 5.2 | 2.7 | 374 | |
| Eastern | 90.5 | 2.3 | 7.1 | 483 | 0.00 |
| Northern | 91.9 | 3.7 | 4.4 | 313 | |
| Western | 94.6 | 3.1 | 2.4 | 487 | |
| Religion | |||||
| Catholic | 91.3 | 3.4 | 5.3 | 739 | |
| Protestant | 91.3 | 3.9 | 4.8 | 755 | 0.08 |
| Muslim | 92.4 | 5.8 | 1.9 | 216 | |
| All others | 86.5 | 4.4 | 9.1 | 54 | |
| Age group | |||||
| 15-19 | 89.0 | 5.4 | 5.6 | 212 | |
| 20-34 | 91.3 | 3.7 | 5.1 | 1,287 | 0.53 |
| 35-49 | 93.2 | 4.1 | 2.7 | 265 | |
| Residence | |||||
| Urban | 81.2 | 8.3 | 10.5 | 268 | 0.00 |
| Rural | 93.1 | 3.2 | 3.8 | 1495 | |
| Wealth Index | |||||
| Poor | 93.9 | 1.8 | 4.3 | 762 | 0.00 |
| Middle | 92.9 | 2.4 | 4.7 | 363 | |
| Rich | 87.3 | 7.3 | 5.4 | 639 | |
| Marital Status | |||||
| Never married | 81.9 | 3.0 | 15.1 | 81.9 | |
| Currently married | 91.7 | 4.3 | 4.0 | 91.7 | 0.00 |
| Formerly married | 92.8 | 1.1 | 6.2 | 92.8 | |
| Parity | |||||
| 1-3 | 89.4 | 5.1 | 5.5 | 89.4 | |
| 4-6 | 93.2 | 2.0 | 4.8 | 93.2 | 0.08 |
| 7+ | 92.9 | 4.1 | 3.0 | 92.9 | |
| Distance to health facility | |||||
| Big problem | 94.1 | 2.8 | 3.1 | 94.1 | 0.00 |
| Not a problem | 89.0 | 4.9 | 6.1 | 89.0 | |
| Visited health facility in past year | |||||
| Did not visit | 95.6 | 2.9 | 1.5 | 95.6 | 0.01 |
| Visited facility | 90.3 | 4.2 | 5.5 | 90.3 | |
Multinomial regression model predicting the Relative Risk Ratios of a woman utilizing Maternal Health Services (2011)
| Variable/Category | Desirable MHS | Moderate MHS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RRR | 95 % CI | RRR | 95 % CI | |
| Education Level | ||||
| None (rc) | 1.00 | - | 1.00 | - |
| Primary | 2.28 | [0.8-6.7] | 0.74 | [0.4-1.6] |
| Secondary + | *4.54 | [1.5-14.0] | 0.95 | [0.4-2.3] |
| Region | ||||
| Kampala (rc) | 1.00 | - | 1.00 | - |
| Central | *0.33 | [0.1-0.8] | *0.32 | [0.1-0.8] |
| Eastern | *0.21 | [0.1-0.5] | 0.77 | [0.3-1.7] |
| Northern | *0.45 | [0.2-1.0] | *0.30 | [0.1-0.7] |
| Western | *0.31 | [0.1-0.8] | *0.25 | [0.1-0.6] |
| Type of Residence | ||||
| Urban (rc) | 1.00 | - | 1.00 | - |
| Rural | 1.13 | [0.6-2.3] | *0.39 | [0.2-0.7] |
| Religion | ||||
| Catholic (rc) | 1.00 | - | 1.00 | - |
| Protestant | 1.17 | [0.7-2.0] | 0.80 | [0.5-1.3] |
| Muslim | 1.14 | [0.6-2.3] | *0.24 | [0.1-0.6] |
| All others | 2.14 | [0.7-6.4] | 2.83 | [1.0-8.3] |
| Marital Status | ||||
| Never married (rc) | 1.00 | - | 1.00 | - |
| Currently married | 1.04 | [0.4-2.8] | *0.40 | [0.2-0.8] |
| Previously married | 0.44 | [0.1-2.0] | 0.73 | [0.3-1.9] |
| Wealth Index | ||||
| Poor (rc) | 1.00 | - | 1.00 | - |
| Middle | 0.98 | [0.4-2.2] | 1.35 | [0.7-2.6] |
| Rich | *1.93 | [1.0-3.7] | 0.96 | [0.5-1.7] |
| Age (continuous) | 1.02 | [1.0-1.1] | 0.94 | [0.9-1.0] |
| Children ever born (continuous) | 0.98 | [0.8-1.2] | 1.11 | [0.9-1.4] |
| Distance to health facility | ||||
| A big issue (rc) | 1.00 | - | 1.00 | - |
| Not a big issue | 1.93 | [0.9-4.2] | *2.67 | [1.2-5.9] |
| Visited health facility in past year | ||||
| Did not visit (rc) | 1.00 | - | 1.00 | - |
| Visited facility | 1.45 | [0.5-4.4] | 0.52 | [0.2-1.1] |
| Model Constant | *0.01 | [0.0-0.1] | 0.84 | [0.1-5.8] |
Note: rc = reference category; n = 1728; Wald chi-square = 170.2; pseudo R2 = 11.5 %; Base model = undesirable category
*Means that variable is significant at p < 0.05