| Literature DB >> 35725605 |
David Amwonya1, Nathan Kigosa2, James Kizza2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Maternal health care is among the key indicators of population health and economic development. Therefore, the study attempted to explore female education and maternal healthcare utilization in Uganda. The study identified the causal effect of introduction of free education by exploiting the age as an instrument at the second stage model (BMC Health Serv Res. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0943-8 ; Matern Child Health J. 2009;14:988-98). This instrument provided an exogenous source of variation in the years of schooling and allowed to implement a regression discontinuity design which accounted for heterogeneity in the cohort overtime.Entities:
Keywords: 2SLS; Fixed effects; MHC; OLS; RDD
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35725605 PMCID: PMC9208099 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-022-01432-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Health ISSN: 1742-4755 Impact factor: 3.355
Fig. 1Map of Uganda showing the regions of the study
Fig. 2Visual representation of the clusters
Summary statistics for the key study variables
| Categorical variables | Control | Treatment | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | Proportion (%) | N | Proportion (%) | ||
| Religion | |||||
| Catholic | 5028 | 37.45 | 13,692 | 47.49 | |
| Protestant | 3836 | 28.57 | 8971 | 31.11 | |
| Muslim | 1249 | 9.3 | 3643 | 12.63 | < 0.001 |
| Pentecostal | 1663 | 12.39 | 1797 | 6.23 | |
| Others | 1650 | 12.29 | 731 | 2.54 | |
| Residence | |||||
| Urban | 1528 | 11.38 | 4139 | 14.35 | |
| Semi-urban | 9943 | 74.06 | 14,151 | 49.08 | < 0.001 |
| Rural | 1955 | 14.56 | 10,544 | 36.57 | |
| Region | |||||
| Central | 4529 | 33.73 | 6772 | 23.49 | |
| Karamojong | 299 | 2.23 | 2332 | 8.09 | |
| North | 3893 | 29 | 7839 | 27.19 | < 0.001 |
| Western | 1704 | 12.69 | 4651 | 16.13 | |
| Eastern | 3001 | 22.35 | 7240 | 25.11 | |
| Sex of the household head | |||||
| Male | 11,946 | 72.94 | 24,999 | 70.13 | 0.161 |
| Female | 4431 | 27.06 | 10,648 | 29.87 | 0.074 |
Fig. 3Kernel distribution of years of education
Fig. 4Line graph for the years of education versus birth years
OLS model estimates
| Variable | Coef | Std. err | t | p > t | [95% Conf Interval] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Religion | |||||
| Protestant | − 0.00 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.999 | − 0.10, 0.10 |
| Muslim | 0.15 | 0.07 | 2.24 | 0.025** | 0.02, 0.27 |
| Pentecostal | 1.28 | 0.08 | 16.64 | 0.000*** | 1.13, 1.43 |
| Others | − 4.50 | 0.09 | − 47.44 | 0.000*** | − 4.69, − 4.32 |
| Region | |||||
| Karamoja | − 2.02 | 0.09 | − 22.78 | 0.000*** | − 2.19, − 1.84 |
| North | 0.17 | 0.06 | 2.78 | 0.005*** | 0.05, 0.28 |
| Western | 0.71 | 0.07 | 10.34 | < 0.001*** | 0.58, 0.85 |
| Eastern | 0.99 | 0.06 | 15.99 | < 0.001*** | 0.87, 1.11 |
| Residence | |||||
| Semi-urban | 1.14 | 0.07 | 16.83 | < 0.001*** | 1.01, 1.28 |
| Rural | − 0.14 | 0.07 | − 1.93 | 0.054* | − 0.28, 0.00 |
| Age | 0.58 | 0.01 | 49.38 | < 0.001*** | 0.56, 0.60 |
| Sex (Female) | 0.13 | 0.04 | 3.06 | 0.002*** | 0.05, 0.21 |
| Wealth Index | 0.00 | 0.00 | 6.44 | < 0.001*** | 0.00, 0.00 |
| No of siblings | − 0.04 | 0.01 | − 6.09 | < 0.001*** | − 0.05, − 0.03 |
| _Cons | − 8.43 | 0.27 | − 31.41 | < 0.001*** | − 8.95, − 7.90 |
***p < 0.001, **p < 0.05, *p < 0.1
Second stage model (2SLS) estimates
| Antenatal utilization | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge of ovulation | Visited health facility | Insurance | |
| Year of education | 0.26*** (0.01) | 0.030*** (0.01) | 0.001 (0.004) |
| Constant | 4.49*** (0.06) | 0.58 *** (0.02) | -0.029 (0.016) |
| N | 52,024 | 15,699 | 15,699 |
| Wald chi2(1) | 5265.24 | 30.93 | 2.50 |
| p-value | < 0.0001*** | < 0.0001*** | 0.1137 |
***p < 0.001, **p < 0.05, *p < 0.1
Model estimates of the RDD
| Estimating for bandwidth 0.8857 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Coef | Std. err | z | p >|z| | [95% Conf Interval] |
| Birth years | 0.84 | 0.41 | 10.31 | 0.000*** | 0.13, 0.91 |
| _cons | 0.03 | 0.11 | 0.51 | 0.972 | − 0.29, 0.41 |
| N = 52,024 | |||||
| Prob > F = < 0.0001*** | |||||
| R-squared = 0.161 | |||||
***p < 0.001, **p < 0.05, *p < 0.1
Fixed effects model estimates
| Antenatal utilization | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge of ovulation | Visited health facility | Insurance | |
| Year of education | 0.31** (0.05) | 1.31*** (0.11) | 0.11** (0.05) |
| Region | |||
| Karamoja | − 15.51** (0.084) | − 4.24** (0.01) | − 6.30** (0.04) |
| North | − 2.22*** (0.74) | − 1.03*** (0.24) | − 1.31*** (0.07) |
| Western | 0.02 (0.29) | 0.43** (0.20) | 1.34 (0.09) |
| Eastern | − 1.06** (0.46) | 0.15** (0.07) | − 1.12** (0.11) |
| N | 52,024 | 15,699 | 15,699 |
| LR chi2(1) | 32.65 | 54.23 | 74.61 |
| p-value | < 0.0001*** | < 0.0001*** | 0.001** |
***p < 0.001, **p < 0.05, *p < 0.1
Robustness checks
| Variable | Coef | Std. err | z | p >|z| | [95% Conf Interval] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Birth year | 0.14 | 0.34 | 6.31 | 0.000*** | 0.12, 0.87 |
| Birth year squared | 0.10 | 0.32 | 4.11 | 0.031** | 0.121, 0.678 |
| _cons | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.21 | 0. 251 | − 0.13, 0.51 |
| N = 52,024 | |||||
| Prob > F = < 0.0001*** | |||||
| R-squared = 0.163 | |||||
***p < 0.001, **p < 0.05, *p < 0.1
Fig. 5Discontinuity plot for years of education with respect to birth year