| Literature DB >> 26184138 |
Marivalda Santa Bárbara1, Cerilene Santiago Machado2, Geni da Silva Sodré3, Luís G Dias4,5, Leticia M Estevinho6,7, Carlos Alfredo Lopes de Carvalho8.
Abstract
This study aims to assess the microbiological parameters and the chemical composition of 21 samples of stingless bee pollen (Melipona mandacaia) from two regions of Bahia, Brazil (João Dourado and Uibaí), with particular emphasis on the nutritional value, total phenols and flavonoids and fatty acids composition. Regarding the microbiological quality, the studied microorganisms (moulds and yeasts, coliforms, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella sp., psychrotrophic and sulfite-reducing Clostridia) were absent in all samples. On the other hand, the values obtained for the aerobic mesophilic microorganism ranged from 11.0 ± 1.0 to 1.32 ± 1.2 cfu∙g-1 (JD samples) and from 282 ± 3.82 to 688 ± 10.1 cfu∙g-1 (U samples). The nutritional parameters (moisture, ash, water activity, pH, total acidity, protein, fiber, total phenolic, flavonoids and reducing sugars) were within the stipulated by law, except for pH and moisture content, which presented superior and inferior values, respectively. Polyunsaturated fatty acids (54.1%) were significantly higher than saturated (42.18%) and monounsaturated (3.71%). It was found that the bee pollen is safe from the microbiological point of view and has a good nutritional quality. The influence of the geographical origin on the assessed parameters was evident, especially concerning the fatty acid profile.Entities:
Keywords: Melipona mandacaia; bee pollen; fatty acids; microbiological quality; nutritional characterization; stingless bee
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26184138 PMCID: PMC6332351 DOI: 10.3390/molecules200712525
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Results obtained for the aerobic mesophiles (cfu∙g−1) in the bee pollen samples from the two locations.
| João Dourado | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample | JD1 | JD2 | JD3 | JD4 | JD5 | JD6 | JD7 | JD8 | JD9 | JD10 | JD11 | ||||||||
| Aerobic mesophiles (cfu∙g−1) | 66 ± 3.6 | 19.7 ± 1.5 | 132 ± 1.2 | 10.9 ± 1 | 195.64 ± 4.56 | 21.33 ± 1.53 | 87.80 ± 2.97 | 11.00 ± 1.00 | 162.11 ± 2.64 | 11.17 ± 1.26 | 121.58 ± 1.41 | ||||||||
| Uibaí | |||||||||||||||||||
| Sample | U1 | U2 | U3 | U4 | U5 | U6 | U7 | U8 | U9 | U10 | |||||||||
| Aerobic mesophiles (cfu∙g−1) | 514.21 ± 8.51 | 497.48 ± 2.32 | 678.27 ± 3.41 | 307.20 ± 2.06 | 350.39 ± 58.88 | 385.60 ± 4.13 | 688.40 ± 10.07 | 352.83 ± 2.46 | 282.15 ± 3.82 | 375.67 ± 5.30 | |||||||||
Figure 1Boxplot for aerobic mesophilic bacteria.
Figure 2Two boxplot graphs of all physical and chemical parameters measured in the samples: (A) raw data; (B) centralized and standardized data.
Figure 3Representation of the first two principal components for all pollen samples distinguishing the place of origin by using different markers: plot (A) includes loadings of the original variables; plot (B) includes possible outline grouping samples.
Descriptive analysis of pollen’s fatty acids.
| Fatty Acid Common Name | Fatty Acids | All Samples (%) | Samples of JD Region (%) | Samples of U Region (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||
| Caprylic acid | C8:0 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.09 | 0.08 |
| Capric acid | C10:0 | 0.28 | 0.17 | 0.42 | 0.05 | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Lauric acid | C12:0 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.02 |
| Myristic acid | C14:0 | 0.28 | 0.11 | 0.32 | 0.12 | 0.24 | 0.08 |
| Pentadecylic acid | C15:0 | 1.28 | 1.10 | 2.00 | 1.04 | 0.50 | 0.41 |
| Palmitic acid | C16:0 | 34.99 | 4.88 | 34.10 | 5.28 | 35.96 | 4.33 |
| Margaric acid | C17:0 | 0.36 | 0.27 | 0.54 | 0.25 | 0.17 | 0.10 |
| Stearic acid | C18:0 | 1.97 | 0.88 | 1.36 | 0.51 | 2.65 | 0.67 |
| Oleic acid | C18:1n9ct | 1.79 | 1.00 | 2.22 | 0.84 | 1.33 | 0.99 |
| Linoleic acid | C18:2n6c | 27.79 | 9.91 | 36.58 | 4.04 | 18.12 | 2.51 |
| α-Linolenic acid | C18:3n3 | 26.08 | 10.03 | 18.85 | 6.47 | 34.03 | 6.62 |
| Arachidic acid | C20:0 | 2.85 | 2.02 | 1.44 | 0.85 | 4.40 | 1.77 |
| Eicosatrienoic acid | C20:3n3 | 0.23 | 0.25 | 0.14 | 0.24 | 0.33 | 0.22 |
| Erucic acid | C22:1n9 | 1.12 | 0.53 | 0.87 | 0.48 | 1.40 | 0.44 |
| Nervonic acid | C24:1 | 0.80 | 0.50 | 0.97 | 0.48 | 0.61 | 0.45 |
Correlation matrix for the fatty acids using Pearson’s correlation coefficients.
| R-Pearson Values | C8:0 | C10:0 | C12:0 | C14:0 | C15:0 | C16:0 | C17:0 | C18:0 | C18:1n9ct | C18:2n6c | C18:3n3 | C20:0 | C20:3n3 | C22:1n9 | C24:1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C8:0 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| C10:0 | 0.1 | 1 | |||||||||||||
| C12:0 | −0.29 | 0 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| C14:0 | 0.27 | 0.43 | 0.13 | 1 | |||||||||||
| C15:0 | 0.27 | 0.66 | −0.32 | 0.53 | 1 | ||||||||||
| C16:0 | 0.42 | 0 | −0.17 | 0.26 | 0.05 | 1 | |||||||||
| C17:0 | 0.19 | 0.66 | −0.11 | 0.11 | 0.71 | −0.15 | 1 | ||||||||
| C18:0 | 0.15 | −0.67 | 0.03 | −0.15 | −0.56 | 0.54 | −0.63 | 1 | |||||||
| C18:1n9ct | −0.08 | 0.49 | 0.40 | 0.37 | 0.25 | −0.43 | 0.29 | −0.45 | 1 | ||||||
| C18:2n6c | 0.14 | 0.87 | −0.05 | 0.32 | 0.65 | −0.26 | 0.74 | −0.74 | 0.48 | 1 | |||||
| C18:3n3 | −0.41 | −0.80 | 0.11 | −0.52 | −0.67 | −0.35 | −0.62 | 0.31 | −0.24 | −0.79 | 1 | ||||
| C20:0 | 0.1 | −0.82 | −0.09 | −0.27 | −0.48 | 0.32 | −0.59 | 0.84 | −0.60 | −0.73 | 0.43 | 1 | |||
| C20:3n3 | −0.43 | −0.17 | 0.21 | 0.01 | −0.17 | 0.08 | −0.03 | 0.19 | 0 | −0.28 | 0.19 | 0.06 | 1 | ||
| C22:1n9 | −0.19 | −0.44 | 0.19 | −0.07 | −0.55 | 0.42 | −0.53 | 0.68 | −0.38 | −0.53 | 0.20 | 0.51 | 0.42 | 1 | |
| C24:1 | 0.24 | 0.55 | 0.27 | 0.48 | 0.22 | 0.51 | 0.22 | 0.05 | 0.22 | 0.38 | −0.71 | −0.27 | 0.09 | 0.24 | 1 |
Figure 4Box-plot for each fatty acid grouped according to sample’s region.
Figure 5The first two principal component scores of the pollen’s fatty acids.