Literature DB >> 26183313

Two new automated, compared with two enzyme-linked immunosorbent, antimüllerian hormone assays.

Scott M Nelson1, Ewa Pastuszek2, Grzegorz Kloss3, Iwona Malinowska3, Joanna Liss3, Aron Lukaszuk3, Lukasz Plociennik3, Krzysztof Lukaszuk4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare new automated antimüllerian hormone (AMH) assay performance characteristics from the new automated Elecsys AMH (Roche; Elecsys) and Access AMH (Beckman Coulter; Access) assays with the existing AMH Gen II ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; Gen II; Beckman Coulter) and AMH ELISA (Ansh Labs) assays.
DESIGN: Prospective assay evaluation.
SETTING: University-affiliated clinical chemistry laboratory. PATIENT(S): Patients referred for serum AMH measurement (n = 83) before start of in vitro fertilization cycle between September 2014 and October 2014. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Serum AMH concentration. RESULT(S): Intra-assay coefficients of variation were low; Ansh ≤ 9.0%; Gen II ≤ 5.8%; Access ≤ 10.7%; and Elecsys ≤ 2.8%. The Passing-Bablok regression equations (pmol/L) were y (Access) = 0.128 + (0.781 × Gen II); and y (Access) = 0.302 + (0.742 x Ansh). For y (Elecys) = 0.087 + (0.729 x Gen II) and y (Elecys) = 0.253 + (0.688 x Ansh Labs). For y (Elecys) = 0.943 - (0.037 × Access). For all the assays, AMH exhibited a moderate positive correlation with AFC (r = 0.62-0.64); number of cumulus oocyte complexes (r = 0.60-0.64); and metaphase II oocytes (r = 0.48-0.50). Accuracy of pregnancy prediction, as determined by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, was uniformly low for all assays (0.62-0.63). CONCLUSION(S): The novel automated assays exhibit strong concordance in calibration, but derived values are substantially lower than those obtained from pre-existing assays, with assay-specific interpretation required for routine clinical use. These results highlight the need for an international standard of measurement of AMH.
Copyright © 2015 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antimüllerian hormone; antral follicle count; assay

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26183313     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.06.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  24 in total

1.  Anti-Müllerian hormone is all you need: an assisted reproductive technology perspective in diagnosing polycystic ovary syndrome.

Authors:  Kate McCullough; William Ledger
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2016-05-11

Review 2.  Reproductive ovarian testing and the alphabet soup of diagnoses: DOR, POI, POF, POR, and FOR.

Authors:  Lisa M Pastore; Mindy S Christianson; James Stelling; William G Kearns; James H Segars
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  Role of Anti-Müllerian Hormone in pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: a review.

Authors:  Agathe Dumont; Geoffroy Robin; Sophie Catteau-Jonard; Didier Dewailly
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 5.211

Review 4.  Fertility in women of late reproductive age: the role of serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels in its assessment.

Authors:  B Meczekalski; A Czyzyk; M Kunicki; A Podfigurna-Stopa; L Plociennik; G Jakiel; M Maciejewska-Jeske; K Lukaszuk
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 4.256

5.  Assessment of the Access AMH assay as an automated, high-performance replacement for the AMH Generation II manual ELISA.

Authors:  Kylie Pearson; Matthew Long; Josephine Prasad; Ye Ying Wu; Michael Bonifacio
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 5.211

Review 6.  Fertility with early reduction of ovarian reserve: the last straw that breaks the Camel's back.

Authors:  Sabahat Rasool; Duru Shah
Journal:  Fertil Res Pract       Date:  2017-10-11

7.  Age-specific serum anti-Müllerian hormone concentration in Japanese women and its usefulness as a predictor of the ovarian response.

Authors:  Yoshimasa Asada; Yoshiharu Morimoto; Yoshiharu Nakaoka; Takahiro Yamasaki; Yutaka Suehiro; Hikaru Sugimoto; Masayuki Yoshida; Minoru Irahara
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2017-09-18

Review 8.  Challenges in Measuring AMH in the Clinical Setting.

Authors:  Hang Wun Raymond Li; David Mark Robertson; Chris Burns; William Leigh Ledger
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 5.555

9.  Factors associated with worse cerebrovascular function in aging women with and at risk for HIV.

Authors:  Felicia C Chow; Yifei Ma; Maura Manion; Adam Rupert; Geralyn Lambert-Messerlian; Cheryl D Bushnell; Marcelle I Cedars; Irini Sereti; Farzaneh A Sorond; Priscilla Y Hsue; Phyllis C Tien
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 4.632

10.  Non-equivalence of anti-Müllerian hormone automated assays-clinical implications for use as a companion diagnostic for individualised gonadotrophin dosing.

Authors:  Stamatina Iliodromiti; Barbara Salje; Didier Dewailly; Craig Fairburn; Renato Fanchin; Richard Fleming; Hang Wun Raymond Li; Krzysztof Lukaszuk; Ernest Hung Yu Ng; Pascal Pigny; Teddy Tadros; Joseph van Helden; Ralf Weiskirchen; Scott M Nelson
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 6.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.